Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - topcandle

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23
271
Community Check:

Where is this update FMV?  Its been over a week.

Around here, we add a few weeks to every promise. Call it crypto time. And give the President of Lalaland a break, too; he probably has some pressing concerns at the moment, such as planting a flag, designing a government, raising a nonviolent army, etc. All in good time.

Is mediocrity good enough for us?

 

272
Community Check:

Where is this update FMV?  Its been over a week. 

273
Great!   I think it's less about the announcement but keeping up the thought of doing a weekly rhythm of communications.  Even a post of no news to report was good.  Consistency to plans is important to perception at this time.

274
Technical Support / Re: Will bitassets in 2.0 Still Earn Interest?
« on: July 19, 2015, 12:04:57 am »

Could set up a swap market like bitfinex that loans to traders and and settles interest payments daily.

I like this idea.  What do we need to make it happen?

Yeah I said bond market because that is what we have been using.  It's actually a swap market rather than a bond market you are thinking of.  It should function like bitfinex, but bytemaster hasn't made this evidently clear.  Unless someone else could confiem

275
Technical Support / Re: Will bitassets in 2.0 Still Earn Interest?
« on: July 18, 2015, 11:13:37 pm »
Shortly after posting my question, I found this...
https://bitshares.org/technology/price-stable-cryptocurrencies/

Is it current?

Yes siree,
Does it disrupt your business model significantly?  I suppose when released, you can use an exchange usd like ccdek, or even create your own bitasset.  There will probably be a common one that everyone gravitates to.  Yeah so no more interest until a bond market is created.

276
General Discussion / No Sommer Announcements for the week?
« on: July 18, 2015, 01:07:10 am »
Wow I actually believed Stan when he said there would be announcements every week until the end of the summer.  Remember until they go to sleep.  It turns out nothing this week.  And last week itself was a non-annoucenment since we already knew about it long ago.  So far the announcements have been underwhelming.  Nothing really says game changing.  And we don't even know what one announcement will do, and this one #4 will occupy yet another annoucenemnt spot at the end of the month.  What happened to all those secret memos and partnerships that Stan couldn't tell us about in his previous weekly updates?


All of this only makes me think how a bit hyperboled up bitshares 2.0 has been.  Can they deliver on time and effectively?  Should we now start questioning the intent the business leaders when they say something?  I think this is constructive criticism if not a good example that I wanted to bring this up with the community because I know I am not the only one who feels slighted if not entirely frustrated. 

277
General Discussion / Re: Hangout Attendance (Brownie PTS)
« on: July 17, 2015, 04:58:12 pm »
you missed me.  sxis.  I left a little bit before the end but attended most of it. 

bts: frozenfan

278
Random Discussion / Re: Randomly Send Brownie Points!!!
« on: July 17, 2015, 04:14:04 pm »
bts: frozenfan


279
Tech issues or negociations are still happening?   

Holding my breath--- we've seen the banks pull out of partnerships so many times already...

280
There is the stock split too.   It is actually a real challenge/expense to get the detailed dividend and split data required without having rounding errors (which compound over time) or violating someone's terms of service.   It is as if we have the new technology and that it is better if we support companies that upgrade.
Yes, in principle bitAssets should allow for ALL possible corporate actions such as dividends, bonus issues, buybacks, takeovers and share splitting.
The impact of any of these should be a fair adjustment to asset value and obligation of shorts.

There are two ways I can think of to do this in the case of stocks:

i) Replicate the corporate actions for owners of bitAssets. That would involve making distributions from the collateral pool for dividends, splitting the number of bitAssets for stock splits etc. I think to work out all these adjustments, while possible, would be very difficult to implement.

ii) Define a bitAsset as representing a varying number of shares. Then the fair value of the bitAsset can be adjusted over time to reflect all of these events. For example, a dividend would result in an increase in the underlying number of shares represented, essentially assuming reinvestment. A stock split would simply represent a change to the number of underlying shares.

I prefer (ii), at least initially, because I think it is a lot easier to deal with. There are no additional mechanics required for implementation of bitAssets, apart from the flexibility to define fair value as a function of stock price that depends on an adjusted number of shares over time.

Your # 2 is the right idea.  It would be the equivalent of a NAV calculation that a Mutal Fund / Actively manage fund would do at the end of the day.  A feed producers responsbility will be to make these calculations everyday, report and submit.  In the end the Spot Prices will be different between a MPA and a Stock, but the Fair Value will be nearly the same.

281
Bitshares?!  Where are we. Are we sure the quality of our partners stacks up against these guys?

http://www.coindesk.com/deloitte-blockchain-auditing-consulting/

282
Where would the revenue stream for dividends even come from?  An attempt to match dividends paid out by the real asset would open you up to potential losses.  I would focus instead on the benefits of the bitasset, such as no counterparty risk, almost instant transactions, and the ability to trade during off hours.  As an investor I would feel less confident if I thought that unsustainable promises had been made.
[/quote

It should be reflected in price.  Meaning even though not paid out, the price has gone up on the market to account for this premium

283
Very experiential and untested.  This would be a huge gamble with little reward if done early in bitshares life

284
General Discussion / Re: Hangout Attendance (Brownie PTS)
« on: July 10, 2015, 05:02:03 pm »
bts: frozenfan


285
Why not just have a web=based wallet with all of that?  Why need it coded into the client?

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23