Very encouraged to see this roadmap.. it's an ideal route for people widely to see progress being made. Well worth the effort then keeping it up to date..

I wonder that some estimated dates ~Jan2016 need restating.. would be interesting for example, to see more clearly where Moonstone is up to, as that's not immediately obvious for all the posts we might find by searching, having it all in one place is much more friendly to potential investors.   

Just to note that the forum seems a bit slow, which is not something I've ever noticed before.. I'm getting 3/4 sec delays on requests for opening pages and the option to reply; submit reply just took 10+ secs. Hopefully that won't last..

Also I notice for the first time Firefox.. now version 42 suggests a flag against the url "The website does not supply identity information" and "The connection is not secure" despite being https:.. "Parts of this page are not secure, such as images"

Online web wallet import keys has been running for 24hrs .. it that doing anything useful or is there another route to getting keys into a 2.0 wallet?..

Where is the build for GUI on 32bit Linux?..

Where is MoonStone's wallet up to atm?..

urgh..

bitshares-0.x for 0.9.3c qt build fails on npm install for why I can't immediately see.. this more time consuming that I was hoping for.

Error is..

npm ERR! git fetch -a origin (git://github.com/linemanjs/grunt-contrib-sass) error: cannot open FETCH_HEAD: Permission denied

logfile suggesting
>6144 error Error: No compatible version found: grunt-contrib-sass@'linemanjs/grunt-contrib-sass

npm ERR! not ok code 0

Is there an option to export from commandline Linux without the qt??

 

We got a new problem now!

We got delegates who are DEAD being voted UP while delegates who are WORKING being voted OUT!

Are they being voted for or just floating up because someone pulled the BTS that was the vote for those others. If a transaction is made from the BTS that is backing a vote, does that vote not just disappear?.. Someone buying bitUSD for example will throw their vote in that transaction? Eitherway, there's not enough people voting and frequently enough that the 101 is stable atm.. old versions and offline delegates perhaps should not even be contenders. .. and I expect everyone waiting for v2.0

Vitalik and the rest must be laughing all the way to the bank..

Yeah.. I wonder who sold this time.. when so many others were being advised of a bug that would null their claim and transfer of ETH.

Looking forward to seeing what happens as soon as people can get their ETH on exchanges and dump.  Pricing it at 10x the IPO price in this era of depressed crypto prices is insanity. 

I'll buy later if it falls below IPO and stabilizes.

I haven't paid much attention and wasn't aware it was priced that off target.. not surprised.

Ethereum 24hr change down 70% atm http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/#markets and I wouldn't be surprised to see it fall a long way more, to below BitShares1.0 where it belongs.

There's no surprise seeing a dump at the open as that is normal, satisfying the substantial minority of speculators who become frustrated. Compounded with that what Ethereum is offering is underdeveloped, I'm not surprised that it's burning and glad that this is the one project I did not invest in.

Ethereum is ambitious to say the least and already there are alarming bugs that those claiming their ETH on Windohs could lose that into null addresses. I wonder then if there are others who are upgrading past that bug and getting out. There's a long way to go before I will buy in.. it's a fragile as Bitcoin in 2010 when I first saw that.. give Ethereum a year to bed down and prove itself.. and then I expect CounterParty will have made it available on BTC blockchain. Why Ethereum went the route of creating a new chain, I don't know.. it just added the wiff of altcoin.

Hopefully BitShares will take note and understand that smart investment follows real demonstrable utility.. BitShares2.0 will need to deliver more than hype and speculative opportunity.. and communicate that in an academic way, not just in marketing speak.

|   davidpbrown   |   davidpbrown   |   davidpbrown   |