Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - davidpbrown

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 46
46
General Discussion / Re: New BitShares (2.0) Website Feedback
« on: June 10, 2015, 09:37:55 am »
Perhaps do a press release, if that's not been done already.. and then a run of articles can be linked to help context; get the journalists to do the work of bridging to potential new users.

47
General Discussion / Re: New BitShares (2.0) Website Feedback
« on: June 09, 2015, 11:03:20 pm »
Design looks good, though I wonder the font appears a bit small; and the blog could do with a bit of spice colour or images.


Who is the customer and what will this do for them? That question could be more obvious.

Big Money audience: "industrial-grade financial smart contract platform" is a great hook.
Top line of links/puffs though I would have thought should be "Decentralized Asset Exchange"; "High Performance and Scalability"; "Collateralized Bond Market". I don't know but whatever will ensure that the key audience is hooked.. they may not scroll down that webpage that looks like every other webpage unless there are enough hooks on first glance.

Individuals:
Does the detail appear too technical for noobs with some cash to invest? How is BitShares obviously appealing to mom+pop who are aware of Bitcoin+ but unsure and unaware of why they might want an "industrial-grade financial smart contract platform".


The "Who" is behind it could be made more obvious.. evidence the strength of the dev team.. skill set if not now named individuals.


Perhaps consider making something of what is now BitShares heritage .. 2.0 is built on the back of experience that others do not have.

Also, I wonder if there are opportunities to make statements from partners and players in FinTech - ones that lend credibility.. "BitShares 2.0 made me say 'Wow' - Janet Yellen." etc.

Perhaps more important than our opinion, is getting the reaction of those new investors you want to engage.. test the water with a few big players who might be intrigued - Barclay's blockchain accelerator and others who are up to speed - and see if that website answers all their questions and perhaps get quotes on the back of their feedback.

I'd replace "Email me when it's ready" to subscribe for alerts and progress updates.. and then keep those interested engaged over time.

and later perhaps integrate the wallet or a demo video. Different people like different methods of communication. The walls of text perhaps need "quotations" in bold that shout out the tldr; .. but there is a lot of content which is great for those with the time to read it.

48
DAC PLAY / Re: make error : no makefile found
« on: June 06, 2015, 12:27:13 pm »
Following the server setup as 0.1.0, and thanks to puppies, this below worked for the GUI:

Quote
sudo apt-get install ruby-sass ri ruby-dev ruby-compass ruby1.9.1-examples ri1.9.1 graphviz ruby1.9.1-dev
cmake -DINCLUDE_QT_WALLET=ON .
cd ./programs/web_wallet
sudo npm install -g lineman angular
sudo npm install
cd -
make buildweb
make

PlayTalk thread is at http://playtalk.org/index.php?topic=320.0

49
During Taulants hangout the other day he mentioned that most of the big players are waiting until the end to add their funds.  They wan't the wallet badly and don't really care about the BTS return of 15%.  They wan't someone else to pay for the open license, then the wallet is basically free for them.

Yes, it sounded very positive.. it is better of course to have more people buy in and the sweetner is a good one. Hopefully that interest alluded to will follow through. Still better that the community here can muster itself when something like moonstone steps up rather than looked for new business interest.. but then on the flipside if it is sincere interest it's engaging new business interests rather than individuals, which is exactly the right way to go.

50
I'm a fan of humour.
..
OP, man I'm sorry, I did it again. Just ban muh ass already. I'm going back to work on the hangout short transcript.

Yeah.. perhaps stick to what you are good at.

51
What happens now is that you wish you had bought BTS with it instead.

Are you two not fans of moonstone?.. and if not, why not?

Rather than just chatter nonsense, I put money where my mouth is. Try and take the piss, if you want but it's more useful than hot air and cheap shots. Also Taulant recommitted to the 15% return today, not that the return over the top of what those BTS will be is why I did it.

52
Is that yo mamma?

You can have your fun after you've done the same or more.. that was the point, as a prompt to others to excuse why it's only at still 17.65%

53
DAC PLAY / Re: make error : no makefile found
« on: June 05, 2015, 06:32:53 pm »
Including the 0.1.1 GUI?.. iHashFury suggesting the same GUI error as before.. see https://playtalk.org/index.php?topic=320.msg857

54
Thanks again for posting these.. though I wonder bytemaster has his mike stuck in a fish tank. Good also to here the moonstone.io update on the other one.

55
Are we any closer to getting a PPA Repository to save users compiling their own?

56
Having put 10BTC to moonstone, it's disappointing to see it's stuck around 17% funding. Any insight into what will happen now with that?

Obviously, I'm hoping 1.0 lives up to expectation. I wonder what the recent price rise was on the back of. There is naturally a risk putting everything out of sight and I'm not talking simply of insider trading but of the usual excuse for a pump. Having everything in the open, helps avoids a pump in error and sees any rises in price, better reflect the reality. There's always reason to create excitement but doing that on the evidence is better because it's less volatile.

Also, although I know little of the technical detail, I see a lot of talk of Rust being better than C++ and wonder if BitShares has considered that.. apparently, it cuts down the code base substantially and brings rigour that avoids common bugs.

57
General Discussion / Re: Fake Internet Plan
« on: June 02, 2015, 09:24:04 am »
BitShares and MaidSafe could go so well together!  They need DPOS, our crowd funding, and our economic system, and we need their routing system, hosting, and storage.

SAFE will go well with everything.. but unclear why they will "need" DPOS; they had the fastest crowdfunding seen in a while; the SafeCoin will act like cash.. obviously, it'll evidence their utility, if they support BitShares and others but "need" is a bit of a stretch -> will benefit from.

59
General Discussion / the BitShare
« on: May 19, 2015, 11:29:35 am »
https://medium.com/@21dotco/a-bitcoin-miner-in-every-device-and-in-every-hand-e315b40f2821
Quote
After much hard work, we’ve created an embeddable mining chip which we call the BitShare that comes in a variety of form factors.

Perhaps with their marketing people will buy BitShares  ;D

60
General Discussion / POLONIEX now KYC compliant
« on: May 18, 2015, 09:18:57 pm »
via safenetwork forum


I've not seen any other detail but expect it's correct.. from May 20th

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 46