Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pc

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 93
46
if someone snatches an order in an intermediate market .. you will end up with an asset that you might not have wanted.

However .. if there was a new feature (read: network upgrade, a.k.a. hardfork) .. that either executes ALL or NO operation in a transaction .. that could help .. but I don't really know if that can be easily intergrated given that you can also have partial fills etc .. [member=18687]abit[/member] ??

A database needs to be ACID so no one should end with an unwanted asset. If the order is snatched in an intermediate market it can't be allowed be taken some time after by anyone else as that order doesn't exist anymore. It's a different order now. However that will only be updated on the next 3 seconds right (next block)?

Unless teh exchange is overloaded with people I dont think this could happen, otherwise that would have caused a problem already with people taking the same order at the same time.
The database is atomic out of the fact that it is single-threaded and uses the LMAX technology ..
But another trader's order in one of your intermediate markets could have been executed in the same block before your set of orders simply because it reached the current block producer first ..
then you might end up in an intermediate asset ..

This could probably be prevented as described above .. I'll add a github issue for it
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/609

Is this problem solved?

The problem has never existed, see my post above for a solution.

47
BitAssets (deren Name mit "bit" anfängt, wie bitUSD) sind eine Art Derivat. D. h. das Asset bildet den Preis von (in diesem Fall) US-$ nach, ohne dass man es direkt in US-$ umtauschen kann.

Bei anderen Assets ist es Sache des Herausgebers, ob und wie man das Asset gegen etwas anderes eintauschen kann. Im Falle der OPEN.xyz-Assets ist der Herausgeber die Firma "Openledger APS" in Dänemark. Sie betreibt Gateways, über die man bspw. OPEN.DASH an seine echte DASH-Adresse schicken kann, bzw. über die man echte DASH in OPEN.DASH umwandeln kann.

49
Technical Support / Re: Lost Password - Brute Force Legal?
« on: March 09, 2018, 11:39:23 am »
Support can't help you recover your password.

You don't have to "brute force the website". The website doesn't have nor validate your password. The password is used to decrypt the .bin file on your local computer. You can brute force that, without using the website at all, and it's perfectly legal too.

50
Interesting proposal. Thanks @bitcrab .

Might make sense to code such a mechanism into the blockchain. The committee are unpaid, Running such infrastructure could easily cost more than what we'd earn in fees.

51
Where exactly do you think our history is incomplete or inaccurate?

52
Erm... I "donated" several BTC IIRC, but I don't have any SOLCERT tokens in my wallet. How do I claim them?

FTR - the issue was resolved. All is well.

53
General Discussion / Re: Why there's no BITJPY?
« on: March 02, 2018, 08:09:47 pm »
JPY has been there right from the start: https://bitshares.openledger.info/market/JPY_USD

54
General Discussion / Re: Look here,muse will fly
« on: February 28, 2018, 02:21:01 pm »
Pretty sure it's dead & has been for years.

I know it's not. :-)

55
Beyond Bitcoin / Re: VEGGIECOIN A Cryptocurrency That Helps Animals!!
« on: February 28, 2018, 02:13:39 pm »

If you want to help animals, start by saving their planet and stop using POW.

+1 !

56
General Discussion / Re: conditional payment feature?
« on: February 25, 2018, 01:12:26 pm »
It should be noted that escrow is already possible by using a dedicated account for each escrow operation (such accounts can be re-used for subsequent escrows).

57
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIP 36 proposal - Remove expired feeds
« on: February 25, 2018, 01:08:26 pm »
Will committee members and private price feed publishers be affected too?

Accounts will not be affected at all. The proposal is to remove expired feeds from the internal data structure of each bitasset, no matter who originally published that feed.

What is the max age of a price feed? Some MPA like XCD (http://open-explorer.io/#/assets/XCD) only need a feed published once per year.

The max age is configurable per asset. This will be taken into account when deciding what to remove, of course.

58
Random Discussion / Re: New Coin in the Market PROMOTION- ETHPLUS
« on: February 25, 2018, 08:05:04 am »
You could at least try to spell Ethereum correctly when writing up your SPAM posts.

59
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIP 36 proposal - Remove expired feeds
« on: February 25, 2018, 07:59:54 am »
We're not talking about actual history here, just leftover feeds from people who are no longer witnesses.

A history of settlement prices would be interesting, we could add that to ES. But that's a different subject.

60
Muse / Re: Couldn't claim Muse from BTS wallet
« on: February 25, 2018, 07:57:29 am »
It's a problem with the GUI. You can claim through cli_wallet, or wait until the website is fixed.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 93