Quote from: bench on May 07, 2019, 12:54:03 pm

Quote from: binggo on May 06, 2019, 01:25:11 pm

Quote from: bench on May 06, 2019, 12:24:49 pm

Quote from: binggo on May 06, 2019, 02:39:44 am

Quote from: bench on May 06, 2019, 01:10:50 am

Quote from: binggo on May 04, 2019, 10:42:05 pm

Quote from: bench on May 04, 2019, 04:00:51 pm

With a higher MSSR there is a bigger arbitrage opportunity and a bigger discount to the market.

MSSR for bitUSD should be at least 3%.

You didn't prove it.

The bigger the discount to feed price, the more people will take the discount.

At this point it's all speculation.

No speculation, this is how markets work.

This is just speculation，you can't prove it.
The market doesn't work as your speculation, the reality has proved it

No speculation, I have valid arguments and you have zero arguments so far.
Explain why a higher MSSR does not result in a higher chance to eat up the margin call?

We have many years with MSSR=1.10, and you should find the result from the market, if you didn't find the result, i think the explain is doughy.

What is the market sentiment？and how did it works? and the margin call was eaten with which market sentiment?

If you understand this i think you will see.

The high MSSR is a cancer of the Bitasset.

We have a consensus about MSSR to be as low as possible and as high as needed?

- RUDEX Gateway integration?
- Native multicoin storage ?
- Night mode template?
- How does it compare to https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=cy.agorise.bitsybitshareswallet&hl=en_US ?

Quote from: bench on May 04, 2019, 04:00:51 pm

With a higher MSSR there is a bigger arbitrage opportunity and a bigger discount to the market.

MSSR for bitUSD should be at least 3%.

You didn't prove it.

The bigger the discount to feed price, the more people will take the discount.

With a MSSR of 2% for bitUSD almost no margin position gets eaten.
MSSR of 2% works good for bitCNY but not for bitUSD.

I am not against a MCR of 1.6, but we also have to raise MSSR for bitUSD to a minium of 2.5% or better 3%, to reduce risks. 

To have stable coins in a highly dynamic environment, we need dynamic parameters to protect the environment and traders better.

In an oversold market lower MCR are needed to compensate the outflow of money and in an overbought market the higher MCR prevents from over collateralize the system.

We had a long way testing with 175% and BSIP42, and both failed. To improve the ecosystem I support the way/idea of @clockwork with dynamic parameters.
Having a constant MCR in a dynamic market brings more trouble, than benefits.

Additional safety features are needed to lower the MCR and help against price suppression.
With a auto settle function for holders with a MCR of 1 from the fee pool, we could avoid a GS. These BTS can be spent afterwards to pay the worker.

Variable MCR (1.5-2) should result in less margin calls. MCR of 1.25 is too low for the market.

After a price drop we can lower the MCR to 1.5 and reduce premiums, after a price rise the premium should get lower and MCR can rise without getting additional margin calls. 

Compared to the BTS price we have enough worker at the moment.

What is the difference from the OL solution?

UI Feedback:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen++mentions%3Afroooze
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen++author%3Afroooze+

Github has no logical OR in search box?