Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MaxPWR

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15
121
MemoryCoin / Re: New Exchange
« on: January 23, 2014, 05:10:47 pm »
A few days ago, the scroll bar disappeared on the MMC Buy side of Bter...today it's longer than the Sell scroll bar :)

Go support poloniex.com

122
MemoryCoin / Re: [CHA] Collecting suggestions
« on: January 23, 2014, 04:56:39 pm »
We should find a nonprofit organization that collects old laptops and donates them to people, and have them install mmc wallets and miners on them first.

And car title and payday loan ads.

Still better than NSA tracking spyware...

123
MemoryCoin / [ATTN: Dwarves] MaxPWR Awakens Smaug
« on: January 23, 2014, 08:50:45 am »
>>login Dwarf
Welcome to Dwarfpool.com
>>create Max's Mine
Hello Max, son of PWR!
How can we help you today?
>>mine Arkenstone
You have awakened Smaug.
>>Max's Mine --help

________________________

The Dwarves of Pool Moria have awakened Smaug:
MSmaugxBNHhpHEPJnHEzC9UsJtWyJnJxwH

Smaug has arisen from Bter to fund Max's Mine for the Dwarven Sect of Max's Mining Union.

Max's Mine buys newly-minted MMC from Dwarven Miners and sells MMC from exchange posts.

Members of the Mining Union register their mining address by sending 1 Vote to:

MAXMinevK5EPyw2fditvrzosy9nCTR6pd1

Registration supports network analysis and marketing by providing network incentives and measuring network data.  Community-trusted accounts are eligible for premium rates.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2518.msg31213#msg31213

________________________________________

124
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCBANK - Max's Mine Buys Mint MMC
« on: January 23, 2014, 07:53:59 am »
Start small and develop as we reach limits for person-to-person trades, etc...but right now this is only community network charity - re-arranging coins, etc.

Network-wise, it improves holding of funds by miners and price growth.

125
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCBANK - Max's Mine Buys Mint MMC
« on: January 23, 2014, 06:30:55 am »
The trade is 100 of your MMC for 102 of my MMC.

Exchange price won't matter.

But, yours have to be mined or taxed (i.e., Officer salaries) from new blocks.  And the premium is if your account is verified by myself, or another MMC member I've already verified / trust.  "Verified" is generic and could apply to any quality check - geographical location, govt ID, honors M.O.D. (MMC on Delivery), etc.

Casting a vote from your "source wallet" for mining / candidate address "registers" your wallet.  Processes like this will give user and network information to support cno/dna network research.

126
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCBANK - Max's Miners' Union & Community Trust
« on: January 22, 2014, 10:08:02 pm »
No formal business / MBA / law experience - professional engineering background (www.nspe.org).  You end up reviewing a lot of engineering codes, standards, regulations, licensing documents, contracts, specifications, procedures, etc...kind of engineering legal-speak...

Helps a bit - but would need to consult with a real lawyer and accountant.

In the beginning, we could start as unregulated / trust-based person-to-person trades with a higher fee than what any experienced trader could get on their own, but it would go towards development...i.e., writing up business plan, bounty / hire real lawyer to review and complete, etc.


127
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCBANK - Max's Mine Buys Mint MMC
« on: January 22, 2014, 09:32:17 pm »
I'd sell you mint at a 20% markup.

We have our first ask price :)

My bid price may change over time, or others could bid...we're doing price discovery for a new market.

If you register your mine by sending a Satoshi to:
MAXMinevK5EPyw2fditvrzosy9nCTR6pd1

Then anyone could see your mine on the blockchain.  You could publish a payout address linked to the mine address (here, or on a website). 

Anyone could agree to your price and bid by sending a vote to your mine and their payment address.  You'd probably re-evaluate price based on your trust in that new address (network history, known owner, etc)...their "seller rating."

I think we just built a public market exchange for trading "verified MMC account status"...meaning that a trusted member has checked your employee ID (govt ID) and expense report (utility bill)? 

128
MemoryCoin / MMCBANK - Max's Mine Buys Mint MMC
« on: January 22, 2014, 06:43:47 pm »
Anyone interested in an easy +2% on new coins?

I will trade my exchange-bought coins for your new coins (mined or Officer-paid) at a 2% premium.

Why? Well, I want you to vote for Max's Mine from your mining address to "register" it as a part of Max's Mining Union.  The Union will verify that your account is accepted by voting back, as discussed below.

This will provide network info to support price and network analysis about size of pools /  users / etc to support network analysis. 

Similar service models can be used to verify different address qualities or conditions.

I use Proof / Mint / Circulated as categories of wallet "conditions", like you'd use as conditions for real coins.  I use these to distinguish if KYC document is submitted / traceable.  But you could change that label to anything and still get the idea - trusted / blessed / shiny / etc.

(Note: Sorry, US members only)
________________

Max's Mine will Buy:

100 Mint MMC from Miner Addresses for 102 Circulated MMC
100 Mint MMC from Candidate Addresses for 102 Circulated MMC

Max's Mine definitions:

Proof Coin:

New coins as first awarded to pool operators, solo miners, or Officer or Charity addresses.

Mint Coin:

New block coins distributed to community Miners, Deputies, or Managers with chain-of-custody verification to original block.  Quality is assigned based on network address and history.  Mint coins are "1-individual" away from Proof Coin, or have a traceable chain-of-custody if multiple individuals away.

Circulated Coin:
Coins in addresses without chain-of-custody verification to original block (e.g., exchange-bought coins), or addresses with coins of mixed quality.  Circulated coins have an unverified / untraceable chain-of-custody to original block.

Limitations:

Max's Mine requires identity (ID) and expense verification (utility bill) from sellers of Mint MMC.  Subject to funding availability.
Min Qty = 100 Mint MMC. 

Directions:

To register your mint mine, send 1 MMC Satoshi from your mining address to:

MAXMinevK5EPyw2fditvrzosy9nCTR6pd1

PM / post / email to confirm and send ID / expense report and payout address.

Payout address may receive Circulated condition coins, and should be separate from any mining address.  Mining addresses may have funds returned - do not deposit directly from a pool payout, only deposit from personal mining wallet.

Upon approval to community standards, Max's Mine will send 1 Satoshi each to verify mining address and payout address.  At any time after account acknowledgement, send Mint MMC (min qty or greater).  Payee address shall respond with Circulated or greater MMC to payout address.

Note: You may register (i.e., vote) without sending documentation, but would not be allowed to trade without verification of community trust.  Any funds received from an unverified address will be returned.  A registered unverified account will still provide mining data to support network analysis and may be eligible for other benefits.

129
Traders / Businesses / Merchants / etc aren't affected as much by market price, since they can typically just base their product prices in fiat and convert to MMC.

Miners are affected more by market price, since that is their product price.  But mining in general, and some miners in specific, will just sell at whatever price (free coinz!) until it stops being worthwhile...that's always the long-term battle the network is facing.

But, yes - we could definitely benefit from having a group of miners come forward and say "look, I'm mining and not selling"...or having merchants / etc come forward and say "look, I bought these funds and plan to use them for X"...or "look, I will give miner's a discount on services instead of them selling on exchange."  Any of those would raise confidence and/or sink miner funds to lower downward exchange pressure.

I created another thread to discuss possible "pro-miner / pro-price" business models or services we could come up with.

130
MemoryCoin / MMCBANK - Max's Miners' Union & Community Trust
« on: January 22, 2014, 04:20:43 pm »
So, for the accountants, business owners, lawyers / etc - any general legal topics / advice to let people know about?

I've got a fun idea...how about an mmc/usd exchange?

"Voting" is the basic function necessary in business for a sole proprietorship to scale-up / develop into another business class (LLC, partnership, etc.).  With the voting and "auto charity" parts of the DAC, I think you could develop a model that leads to a real-world fiat-MMC credit union style business.

Combine the concepts of a nonstock (nonprofit) corporation, cooperative, a business trust, and a partnership, and you may be able to "legally" authorize (entrust) someone to operate a checking account on behalf of the MMC community members that person votes for.

Let's say the account is for operating funds such as payroll.  Let's say the co-op hires / contracts people to mine new coins.  As part of employment record, co-op may ask for ID and utility bill (if required by bank provider).  Co-op "votes" for employee miner address to approve / "hire".  Miner sends new coins to co-op's mmc address, co-op pays wages (income) from checking account to miner.  Co-op maintains any responsible documentation / records / tax records / etc.

Isn't that basically a community / non-profit accounting service, credit union, or financial trust?

131
What if someone said this:

I will trade GPUs at 10% off if paid from an address that pays me in mined MMC.  Full price if MMC comes from an exchange.
-or-
I will hire you to mine MMC for me.  Give me an MMC wallet address, ID, and utility bill, send any MMC you mine to me, and I will pay you in fiat, merchandise, right back in btc...etc. 

You need to trust me to honor the trade, which comes from "reputation" of the address you're sending to.  Reputation comes from trust of others.  Community trusts officers the most, next would be addresses the officers pay out to, "long-timer" accounts with high MMC-days accumulated, etc.  Reputation essentially increases in-network purchasing power.  Other MMC users may offer you discounts on services, etc for higher rep addresses.
_______________________

Anyways, withdraw from exchanges and post your addresses to start accumulating rep.

132
MemoryCoin / Re: IMPORTANT! Help support MMC on Cryptsy
« on: January 22, 2014, 08:01:22 am »
I voted a while ago - anyone else not vote yet?

Any news from cryptsy?  Maybe I'll just start my own exchange...

133
Any "information" or "quality" we can assign, maintain, or trust at an address, the greater the potential value in the right application, and the better overall network data we can give BTChris.

Keep exchange funds, officer funds / payments, and mined funds in separate wallets.  They may be worth more to different services / merchants / etc.

For example, I could see these categories:

1. Proof Address - Address which only receives new coins - pools / solo miners / Officers.
2. Mint Address - Address which is 1 entity (person / company / etc) away from proof Address - Officer "contractors" / pool miners.
3. Near Mint Address - Address whose chain of custody is traceable to a Mint Address
4. Circulated Address - Address whose chain of custody is not traceable to a Mint Address - e.g., exchange bought funds

There's already enough mixing methods (e.g., coinjoin) if you want those, but there are also uses for not mixing.  If you mix mined and exchange-bought funds in one address, you can't really prove which are which anymore, and you'd lose any additional "Mint condition" value in the future.

For example, it may be more valuable to prove "I mined these" than have no proof and have someone only buy at "circulated" prices...or someone offering services for only mint addresses / etc.


(Or, in political terms - officers are government employees union, miners are manufacturing / financial union, merchants are service employee / developers union - and if we can identify / assign / trace funds to their addresses, we can tailor services to specific members)

134
MemoryCoin / Re: MemoryCoin Wallet 0.8.581 Bug
« on: January 22, 2014, 07:31:51 am »
I've found the new address display a bit lacking, too.

I agree the default address UI needed reinforcing, but you could have just dimmed / grayed the font instead of removing.

In the hierarchy of commandline / qt / web UI, I think you need to consider 3 member classes and their "accounting" needs:

- Miners / Customers - a single default address may be preferred.
- Merchants / Service Providers - multiple vanity "receive" addresses and "private network accounting" to identify from address / balances / vote tallies / etc.
- Officers / Developers - May need multiple service provider wallets for multiple projects.

The basic functions are there, so you could implement any additional services as a web UI or qt update, but I like the idea of people spending time in the qt-client instead of web wallets...easier to mine.  (Could we modify Firefox / Chrome with node.js / some plugin to make an MMC web browser that mines with like 1 thread so it's unnoticeable? :) )

Then, instead of just a "wallet", MMC could basically be an "account".  Imagine then if you say "I'll put X MMC satoshi in A MMC address for each Y BTC in B BTC address I own".  You could do all your accounting - through web, or in qt-client - from one wallet.  Is that mastercoin?  Or masterwallet?


135
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Coaex - MemoryCoin Gold Exchange
« on: January 22, 2014, 06:58:06 am »
As far as "broadcasting" a buyer review / seller rating:

Coaex or any site could create a new wallet and say, "please vote for this address to leave feedback".  Buyers could vote 1-9.  Anyone could read it off the blockchain, and the site could use it as a seller rating. 

Votes could be weighted by a "buyer trust rating" calculation to keep out spamming / votes from non-customers / etc.  For example, don could vote for Coaex, and his vote would mean more if coming from an MMC addresses "closer" to a block reward, etc.  A vote from an address that just came off an exchange with no history would be weighted less overall, although Coaex could count and report it on their site if it matched one of their buyer addresses.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15