...
you toast have 1000 PTS, NRS holder has 1000k, he mined to show support, you did not. There is no way i will give you 100 NRS, i had planned to give you 30, why? because with that 30, you would have a small interest in what i am doing, as a result you'd check in once in a while. later when you see the developments and choose to want in, you'll either mine, or buy-in. But if i gave you 100 NRS, you would already have enough to invest without even expending a single resource. meaning the dividends due to those shares are all free, not a single addition of value from you.
"Free" and "already payed for" are not the same thing.
Honoring the social consensus, in my opinion, is not about getting people to help you write your code as much as it is about building the network effect. As is obvious looking at the list of failcoins, building network effect is much more difficult than just writing the code. By honoring the social consensus, you invite this community (as one of the largest and most qualified cryptoequity and DAC communities in existence) to judge your product. If they think it's worthless, they'll certainly dump it. If not, even those who don't help code it will use it, and will relay word of its merit to those around them.
If you're more optimistic about having your product evaluated by a less knowledgeable group, that's entirely up to you.