Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lafona

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16
211
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 19, 2014, 02:26:05 pm »
Initially my contribution would be the delegate. I know this sounds silly as it is technically paid, but my thought was another delegate with price feeds would be worth 1%. I imagine as more and more people come up with great ideas and higher paid delegates it would get voted out, but in the meantime it would provide added robustness(by having the extra price feeds) at a relatively low cost.

212
Stakeholder Proposals / delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 19, 2014, 01:53:15 pm »
Hi Everyone,

I just wanted to update that the 1% delegate with feeds is up and running. I have confirmed that feeds are being published for BTC CNY EUR GOLD SILVER USD. Feel free to check it out with
blockchain_get_feeds_from_delegate delegate-1.lafona

If you want to do something about the low feed publishing, I would be happy to have your vote.

OP:
I would like to announce my new 1% delegate delegate-1.lafona. As this is my first delegate I though it would be appropriate if I kept the pay rate low. I am really excited about the potential of this project and this community and I hope I can contribute by offering a more economic alternative. My plan would be to run the 1% delegate for at least a month or so until I am confident I can provide acceptable service(good reliability & price feeds). At such point that I am confident, I would like to replace it with slightly higher paid delegate(2 or 3% or whatever is a reasonable rate at that time).
In summary I hope you will support me in reducing pay for the system and adding another delegate with price feeds(which I would like to have up and running by next week). If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to ask.

Benefits to System
Publish price feeds (Currently ~30 delegates without price feeds)
Reduce Cost(Will save 66% if it replaces a 3%, more when you count the fees for publishing the feeds)
Diversify Delegate Team(Currently 11 init delegates still up)

213
Technical Support / Re: registering delegate
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:31:05 pm »
Ok, so it would technically be a sub account then?

214
Technical Support / registering delegate
« on: November 15, 2014, 02:02:31 pm »
Hi I have been attempting to register a delegate and I have been getting the following message.


10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
key->has_private_key():
    {}
    th_a  wallet.cpp:1577 get_private_key


Im not sure what is missing. The command I am using is.

wallet_account_register delegate3.lafona delegate3.lafona null 3
thanks

215
Technical Support / Re: Problem starting client
« on: November 14, 2014, 11:11:19 pm »
Thanks, is there a command I need to change in order to pull master?

216
Technical Support / Re: Problem starting client
« on: November 14, 2014, 02:10:21 am »
output when I run under gdb

(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/ubuntu/Applications/Bitshares/bitshares/programs/client/bitshares_client
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Loading blockchain from: /home/ubuntu/.BitShares/chain
Loading config from file: /home/ubuntu/.BitShares/config.json
[New Thread 0x7ffff638d700 (LWP 1469)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff5b8c700 (LWP 1470)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff538b700 (LWP 1471)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff4b8a700 (LWP 1472)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe7fff700 (LWP 1473)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe77fe700 (LWP 1474)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe6ffd700 (LWP 1475)]
[New Thread 0x7fffcb1e2700 (LWP 1476)]
[New Thread 0x7fffca9e1700 (LWP 1477)]
[New Thread 0x7fffca1e0700 (LWP 1478)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc9996700 (LWP 1479)]
Not starting RPC server, use --server to enable the RPC interface
[New Thread 0x7fffc90d3700 (LWP 1480)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc88d2700 (LWP 1481)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff6f59e9b in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6

217
Technical Support / Problem starting client
« on: November 14, 2014, 02:00:18 am »
Hi I recently began having difficulty running the client. When I attempt to start, I get

Loading blockchain from: /home/ubuntu/.BitShares/chain
Loading config from file: /home/ubuntu/.BitShares/config.json
Not starting RPC server, use --server to enable the RPC interface
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

It was compiled in ubuntu 14.04 if that makes any difference

thanks

218
Stakeholder Proposals / Simple feed delegate payrate
« on: November 13, 2014, 03:06:27 am »
Hi everyone

I was wondering what might be a good payrate for a simple delegate. Basically I would like to set up a simple delegate, which would publish feeds for the main pairs. It seems that there are still quite a few spots that are not publishing feeds, and I figured having more feeds would be beneficial. Is this something people would vote for? And how much would be appropriate?


219
Marketplace / Re: Recommended VPS provider and package for Delegate
« on: November 13, 2014, 01:55:58 am »
Thanks Riverhead,

Is the 1GB sufficient? I see the wiki recommends 2GB, at least for the compile.

What I've been doing is compiling on a local Ubuntu install and then scp'ing the binary up to Digital Ocean. The client itself takes very little resources to run but it does take a fair amount to compile.

When you copy the binary over, are there any additional steps you need to do. I have tried this and I seem to get a message saying that I am missing GLIBCXX_3.4.20

I got this too starting with v0.4.24-RC1. The simple solution was to copy over the required file from the computer used to compile it with to the VPS. The file and its path was in the error message that I got.

Awesome, that fixed it. Thanks!

220
Marketplace / Re: Recommended VPS provider and package for Delegate
« on: November 12, 2014, 03:15:35 am »
Thanks Riverhead,

Is the 1GB sufficient? I see the wiki recommends 2GB, at least for the compile.

What I've been doing is compiling on a local Ubuntu install and then scp'ing the binary up to Digital Ocean. The client itself takes very little resources to run but it does take a fair amount to compile.

When you copy the binary over, are there any additional steps you need to do. I have tried this and I seem to get a message saying that I am missing GLIBCXX_3.4.20

221
General Discussion / Re: Merchant Marketing Pitch
« on: November 07, 2014, 11:37:22 pm »
Looks good. You might want to add something about pricing and transactions being in dollars, seems obvious but they might not think of the benefits over btc. Specifically to reduce volatility exposure and simplify transactions/pricing. Something like

Settle in dollars: Reduce exposure to volatility and simplify transactions

or

Simplify transactions: no currency conversions, no making change

I am excited though. Go Bitshares!



222
General Discussion / Re: *Draft* October Newsletter - Halloween Edition
« on: November 01, 2014, 03:44:45 pm »
@Stan

Yeah that's perfect. Thanks


223
General Discussion / Re: *Draft* October Newsletter - Halloween Edition
« on: November 01, 2014, 02:29:35 pm »
I just have one suggestion for the table or maybe a comment after the table. If one skims through the press release and glances at the table it might be possible to get misled that the sharedrop honors the pts/ags holders at the DNS snapshot and not its current holders (My initial thought). After reading more carefully the release and the comments, I can see it was meant more to explain the allocation(which was previously talked about) and not define a different one. So, a sentence clarifying that current DNS holders will be snapshotted might be helpful to reassure any doubt. Otherwise I am really excited about the changes.

224
General Discussion / Re: The Future of the BTSX Market Engine...
« on: October 08, 2014, 10:31:16 pm »
When I looked this morning, it seemed like there were shorts with a less than 30 day expiration, suggesting that it has already been implemented. I also saw some expiration dates to be around a year or so out, so some were probably grandfathered in too.

225
General Discussion / BitUSD/BTSX market last 24 hours
« on: September 19, 2014, 08:54:32 pm »
Was there a crash of the market around 7:00 AM EST today? I have a couple of short orders that were called and I can't figure out why.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16