Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 麥可貓

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 18
61
我個人的淺見是,這樣的頁面十分賞心悅目, 也很聚焦
許多大廠的官網都採用類似的設計, 例如:
蘋果的官網:
http://www.apple.com/iphone-6/
微軟的官網:
http://windows.microsoft.com/zh-tw/windows/home

好處在於, 每個版面只聚焦在一個重點, 也方便在小屏幕的手機端觀看
當然, 多語言版本以及更多頁面例如問答集是需要的

62
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 1101 Play mumble會議問題收集
« on: November 02, 2014, 10:27:37 am »
问了等于白问。
play是否11.5快照?
回答 不清楚
11.5后如何救pts
回答  不知道
事事都要bm拍板吗?
可悲啊

Quote
The play snapshot take on PTS will be on Nov.5th, the same with BTS merging.

這句話的意思就是會在11月五號快照, 不是不知道

63
- the internationalization is not complete (chinese interface), only the messages from web wallet is translated
- messages from bitshares core program is not translated
- messages from qt framework is not translated
- e.g., main menu,  status bar in the bottom
- e.g., 'Block are synced' should be shown as '區塊已經同步完成'

Where are you seeing messages from BitShares core and qt framework?  Screenshots might be helpful.

Chinese locale is available at https://github.com/BitShares/web_wallet/blob/master/app/static/locale-zh-CN.json and a directory listing of other translations is available at https://github.com/BitShares/web_wallet/tree/master/app/static

If you have additional translations, the best way for us to receive them is pull requests to the above Github repo.

translation of locale-zh-CN.json has been completed. the problem is the remaining part.

64
KeyID / Re: Why DNS has to accept the merger, and an apology
« on: October 22, 2014, 05:19:37 pm »
Thanks for your effort.

65
General Discussion / Re: new bts have a big bug,BM is the big bug
« on: October 22, 2014, 04:37:14 pm »
I confess... I am a bug.  I have many buggy ideas, and imperfectly implement my vision...

*PLEASE* help me fix this bug... anyone...

I think technically most people can understand your desicion.  But please be careful that people's feeling (not interest) don't get hurt during this process,  e.g.  toast (in my opinion).  Because while they may want to do the best thing for this community just like you,  thay may also want to keep their promise.

Just take care of these problem ASAP and go toward the direction with your dev team.

66
中文 (Chinese) / Re: Play是怎样的游戏币兑换平台?
« on: October 18, 2014, 10:43:37 am »
太好了
昨天mumble才有欧美社区的朋友问起pls的机制
我想他们会很高兴看到这篇

67
General Discussion / Re: mesh networking, last mile problem, and BTSX
« on: October 17, 2014, 05:08:22 am »
Some people is trying to bring mesh networking to bitcoin:
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-wi-fi-system-enables-payments-sharing-internet/

Quote
It seems one of the long awaited “killer apps” of Bitcoin is almost here. A new video on YouTube shows off a Bitcoin Wi-Fi hotspot that can receive Bitcoin payments.

This means that anyone with a connection to the Internet could soon be able to share their connection with complete strangers in exchange for bitcoins. Although the demo of the concept in the video is quite basic, it gives us a glimpse of how Bitcoin may be able to fuel the mesh networks of the future.

68
General Discussion / Re: mesh networking, last mile problem, and BTSX
« on: October 15, 2014, 04:42:36 pm »
For smartphones, iOS 7.0+ and android 4.0+ already have features required to implement mesh networking in you apps, and that's one of the reasons why apps like firechat are so popular these days.

I don't think firechat uses Mesh protocol - it might be some other technique like ad-hoc?

Yes, it is using mesh network technology, from here:
Quote
As throngs of pro-democracy protesters continue to organize in Hong Kong's central business district, many of them are messaging one another through a network that doesn't require cell towers or Wi-Fi nodes. They're using an app called FireChat that launched in March and is underpinned by mesh networking , which lets phones unite to form a temporary Internet.

Furthermore, the company developed firechat also has another app called opengarden that provide mesh networking for desktops (Win/OSX).

69
General Discussion / Re: mesh networking, last mile problem, and BTSX
« on: October 15, 2014, 03:00:44 pm »
Have you considered the technical issues at hand with this idea?

Most existing wifi routers would need a firmware flash to support the correct mode on the NIC. I'm pretty such most mobile phone do not support this either by default.

Routers did requires some customization, but I think it won't be a problem if there is a financial incentive, especially there are already many linux-based routers that can use free firmwares like totmato, dd-wrt, etc that can add any functions you want.

For smartphones, iOS 7.0+ and android 4.0+ already have features required to implement mesh networking in you apps, and that's one of the reasons why apps like firechat are so popular these days.

70
General Discussion / Re: mesh networking, last mile problem, and BTSX
« on: October 15, 2014, 12:03:32 pm »
in this article from WSJ blog, the mesh network technology is mentioned as important as blockchain technology. If bitshares can have them both, I think this would be the killer feature that is superior than any competitiors.

71
KeyID / Re: KeyID v0.0.4 HOTFIX - init delegates voted back in
« on: October 14, 2014, 03:15:34 pm »
we have updated to 0.0.4 earlier today.
However, we found that 0.0.3 is still tagged as 'latest release' in releases page of guthub. So we wonder everyone update to this version now?
Thank you.

72
KeyID / Re: Observation about DNS stake
« on: October 14, 2014, 11:28:20 am »
Nice to see that your high approval rating is simply a result of you doing a good job! :)

The voting history for their delegates confirm this, as the "big" votes are composed of many different voting transactions with stakes ranging from ~100k to ~19mill. Other than toast's votes no other votes exceed 19million, as you can see at the bottom here:

http://dns.bitsharesblocks.com/delegates/delegate?name=x1-sun

Thank you!

73
KeyID / Re: Observation about DNS stake
« on: October 14, 2014, 10:48:34 am »
Actually we are not big stake holders,  therefore we don't have the ability to control the network. For situations like this and possibly more in the future,  I think we could implement some command to observe the ditribution of votes of designated delegates,  so that  big shareholders trying to control multiple delegates can be distinguished.

74
General Discussion / Re: A cross-chain idea derived from escrow
« on: October 11, 2014, 12:30:04 pm »
seems like the escrew is going to be used BitShares Play:
http://www.bitsuperlab.com/pdf/BitSharesPlayWhitePaper.pdf

Quote
Systems like BitShares X have user issued assets which can represent tokens of some digital equity. If
systems like this support escrow mechanisms, which mean destroy some Bit Asset (say PLS assets) in
the exchange, and create same amount of tokens(PLS) in the BitShares Play system, and vice versa. This
is achieved by consensus communication between two systems, for example, if PLAY detects that some
amount of PLS assets are sent to a escrow address, then, PLS with same amount will be created in the
BitShares Play system, and vice versa. An escrow address is some special address of the system that no
one knows the private key of.

75
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: October 10, 2014, 08:59:25 am »
What determines the price of a song?

The artist.

What determines the price of an Iphone cover on ebay? The seller!
ebay has no say in how much a product sells for on their platform.

Is there any other selling model? For example, Google Music has 'monthly subscription' that you can listen to whatever you want with $9.99/month. In Taiwan, east asia and many other places, people would prefer this model than paying for each song. Considering this mode does not mean to invest any specific artist, I think the fee for monthly subscription should charged as Notes, and then:
1. shared between artists.
2. or used to buy and burn artistcoins of songs that were listened.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 18