3166
General Discussion / Re: something wrong with obits?
« on: January 28, 2016, 08:33:15 am »
A dump?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
3167
Technical Support / Re: is the witness thing running under win?
« on: January 28, 2016, 12:36:33 am »However you can try my compiled binary just to test it out. Remember to remove the blockchain and object folders.
https://github.com/btscube/bitshares-2/releases
Testing right now...
Did you change your repository in the last 2 mo. or so? I specifically checked, during this ordeal (last 2-3 days) to see if you have any compilation of your own and I did not see any.
[edit] ...and the same result...same chain ID as in the pic above...
Sorry Tony I didn't understand what you've said.
If you problem hasn't get solved yet, it might be a really stupid human error.
You reinstalled cli tools? the file date changed or still 1/4?
what's the path of the files (in the picture)?
what's your exact command for starting witness_node?
By the way I'm using cube's binary file and it works fine.
3168
General Discussion / Re: OPENPOS :: Smartcoins Point Of Sale (POS) & BitShares Wallet for Android/iPhone
« on: January 27, 2016, 10:46:46 pm »Sounds like a paid service? Interesting..nothing you can do on your end since you have to receive the data before you can filter it ..No there is, what I'm saying is he needs to filter the outgoing data from the witness node using a proxy server. A node websocket server using socket.io should do the trick. He would need to host his own witness_node then obviously.
So, I would need to have the mobile wallets all connect to one dedicated witness node? Could we just have a few/all of the Witnesses provide this as an option to their service? So, for mobile clients, the Witnesses will only serve up just the filtered stuff? Heck, this might be a great value-add for all Witnesses, no? Many more mobile wallets will be released after our I'm sure. Thoughts?
3169
General Discussion / Re: Radical ideas for liquidity
« on: January 27, 2016, 10:34:01 pm »Maybe the committee could create and offer the main gateways a straight swap for their existing IOUBTCs to BitBTC.Jonny, why don't you join the committee? Then you can do what you want.
3170
General Discussion / Re: How to cover questions...Back to basics...
« on: January 27, 2016, 10:22:07 pm »Thank you very much @abitYes
Do I understand correctly that in case of margin call the max premium over the feed price is 10% ?
3171
General Discussion / Re: How to cover questions...Back to basics...
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:17:10 pm »@xeroc fair enough...I am aware of all that... I will ask again...You can't set it to zero..
What is the "close position" and "update position" difference?
If no one is selling the bitasset I need to cover can I reduce my collateral ratio to zero and get margin called? What premium will I pay over the feed price if I do that?
I am sure that there is a better option to cover a bitbtc or bitusd position without paying 40% premium and I am not aware of it..
Without an ask order you'll never be margin called. Once you're called the premium is the average SQP, see https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD for example (/100)
3172
General Discussion / Re: Percentage based transfer fee [BSIP10] implemented
« on: January 27, 2016, 07:56:12 pm »@roadscape Maybe you quoted something wrong? "Unable to apply percentage base fee mode to BTS" is because BTS's issuer is null-account, the committee is unable to change BTS's options. Unless we add a dedicated API for doing that.[KNOWN ISSUES/LIMITATIONS]
* Unable to apply percentage base fee mode to BTS
Please be aware of this^ limitation.
I wish we had some choice regarding this, nevertheless I think percentage-based fee mode for BTS is not crucial - there could be a flat transfer fee for BTSwhich is kept quite low.
As I said.. the simplest solution would be for the GUI to slightly overpay UIA fees.
How much you overpay can be a setting in the wallet. The default could be 1%.
It will prevent this problem 99.9% of the time.
If you want to save a few cents at the risk of rejected transactions, you could set it to 0%.
3173
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 07:37:28 pm »
BTS一路跌下来，很多人心态都变了。
连野猪都变黑子了，bts形象能好？
大家都想赚钱。这没错。
什么能力做什么事情。
其实现在很多事还是BM说了算。BM不发布新版exe，时代可以2个星期不升级钱包。
我写的代码，要是BM不同意上，就100%上不了。
要想控制他也不实际，他不是愿意乖乖听话的人。
连野猪都变黑子了，bts形象能好？
大家都想赚钱。这没错。
什么能力做什么事情。
其实现在很多事还是BM说了算。BM不发布新版exe，时代可以2个星期不升级钱包。
我写的代码，要是BM不同意上，就100%上不了。
要想控制他也不实际，他不是愿意乖乖听话的人。
3174
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:41:18 pm »早说你就是为了钱嘛，搞那么多堂而皇之的理由，害我们搞老半天跟你就事论事，讲道理你就发飙。
我转时代是我的自由，因为我合并后就把没冻结的清仓了，因为我知道无脑吸血制度会一直延续下去而且最终会导致什么结果，呵呵。（就是现在的结果）
哦？我清仓了就不能上来好好评论了？
没关系，你也随意哈，既然不会好好说话，那我祝你吸血成功。
我当然是为了钱。我的开发贴第一句话就说了是要钱的。你没看到大概是因为选择性忽略？或者选择性遗忘？
炒家跟实业家看问题角度、解决方式肯定不一样的。并不是说谁对谁错，只是贡献不同。
3175
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:21:42 pm »
你们都说要1BTS，ok，花2bts自己申请个理事会账号，一个命令申请改参数，一个命令投票同意，就搞定了。
上啊。光说不练算什么。
上啊。光说不练算什么。
3176
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:18:19 pm »
靠，被群攻了。 
你们这么有想法，不如多搞点人来投票。一个个账号上有点BTS就转时代，谈什么支持？
天天说BM瞎搞，他现在天天这么低价出货，怎么没见你们接盘进转钱包来投票？把他的worker投下去啊。
400块钱一个终身会员又不贵，炒币的随便搞几下就赚到了，来支持了吗？
天天说要这个应用好那个应用好，你做个出来呀！
没人做开发，我做点开发赚点钱不行？
我这个worker肯定会申请的，并且我会想办法拉票。你们不愿上，就想办法让我不要投上去。
不用给我面子。
你们这么有想法，不如多搞点人来投票。一个个账号上有点BTS就转时代，谈什么支持？
天天说BM瞎搞，他现在天天这么低价出货，怎么没见你们接盘进转钱包来投票？把他的worker投下去啊。
400块钱一个终身会员又不贵，炒币的随便搞几下就赚到了，来支持了吗？
天天说要这个应用好那个应用好，你做个出来呀！
没人做开发，我做点开发赚点钱不行？
我这个worker肯定会申请的，并且我会想办法拉票。你们不愿上，就想办法让我不要投上去。
不用给我面子。
3177
General Discussion / Re: why cancel order with fee? even back the fee create order ?
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:30:53 pm »
We need lower fees so that market maker bots can sustain.
We need higher fees to prevent spam.
We need a balance.
We need higher fees to prevent spam.
We need a balance.
3178
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 按百分比计算转账手续费功能，开发完成
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:27:35 pm »为什么不以bitusd或bitcny为收费标准，然后兑换成bts支付手续费。1.如果做自动调，我开价翻一倍。你愿意给吗？
如最低收费不是6bts而是0.1cny ,当bts增值时，自动调节最低bts收费标准。
2.现在讨论的方案，类似国内调油价的机制，当BTS价格波动多少时，理事会有义务相应调手续费
3179
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:13:26 pm »目前的bts可玩性 我都懒得开钱包啊。连你都不去弄，谁来弄啊。没人弄，只有死啊。
怎么办 弄点好玩的应用才行啊。
3180
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:10:20 pm »"买终身会员更划算"多少是一个假象，因为玩BTS并不是刚需，很多人看到这种让人蛋疼的收费结构就直接不玩了。百分比功能上了之后，那些没价值的UIA，或者说不在系统内交易的UIA，肯定会转成百分比模式的，不管你百分比、上限定多少，都没关系，这些转账只会按最低费用来算。推荐人在这里是赚不到钱的。
我没看到什么证据支持推荐人在这里作用很大的结论，fav费了半天劲也就那样吧。而且，我觉得有志帮BTS开拓的人有很多种获得收入的方法，FBA，UIA，privatized smartcoin, 这些方式跟推荐收入比起来，最大的好处是收入来源于更上层的应用，而不是来自底层的基础服务，没那么多副作用。而且玩家有自由去定制自己的收费服务，互不影响。
我前面支持百分比是因为我觉得这样可以鼓励小额转账，我从未想过要用此方法来增加系统和推荐人收入，从一开始我就坚决反对把max limit定得过高（是的，30BTS在我看来就已经很高了）。
还有比如几块钱的小额转账等。这些用来吸引用户进来。
推荐人用来赚钱的，是锚定资产和有价值的UIA资产比如OpenBTC等的大额转账。这里推荐人收益空间很大，如果参数 0.1%/1/100，推荐人每笔最高可以赚99BTS。
用户被吸引进系统后，慢慢发现有这些可以用，考虑到长期用的话，买终身会员更合算，就可能会买终身会员。买了终身会员还可以推荐别人，可以帮别人打折，最多可以返还80%手续费。
比如时代加一个推荐链接，自己推荐的客户每次充值送10BTS，不是自己推荐的就没有送。其实都是用户自己的钱，但是用户感觉就不一样。
比如巨蟹你如果自己发展客户，但不想从客户身上赚推荐费的话，如果他们不买终身会员，可以给他们返80%手续费；他们买终身会员的话，你可以返80%的会员费。
如果不发展自己的客户，只是盯着别人的用户，那么从别人身上赚钱就难一点，关系也可能难维护一点。
这个推荐制度最适合有自己客户群的人，把自己业务发展到BTS上来，把自己客户发展到BTS上面来。当然系统要实际有用才好发展上来。介绍别人来买BTS在我看来不是好业务。
