Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 68
181
General Discussion / Re: Abit is a scammer
« on: August 01, 2020, 07:52:01 pm »
We've already seen BTS fail to increase in market value whilst BTC/ETH/BCH etc all have increased 25%+ the last few days. The complete desolation of BTS reputation has been realized & CN has no money to invest in BTS evidenced by their repeated bailout demands.

182
Did have any new update for new version?
The UI worker proposal was not activated, so no funding has been committed to further UI development to the benefit of hackers. Why would you think it's in development without funding?

Seems cn-vote control the fund,but they can get money with other way… the income of wittness and MM.
Make money another way then donate their time for UI development? That's simply not realistic. Pay for UI development if you want it.

183
Did have any new update for new version?
The UI worker proposal was not activated, so no funding has been committed to further UI development to the benefit of hackers. Why would you think it's in development without funding?

184
do not support this, it will hurt a big group one more time.
to optimize the system, firstly need to find a chance to lower the USD threshold to be equal to that of CNY.

I now changed my idea, I'd like to support this kind of proposal.

I have expected that BTS price can be up 0.22CNY without much difficulty. so bitCNY can return to peg naturally, but what happened is not what I expected.

Now although bitCNY has big supply, but it's more like a game.

reducing threshold from 0.22 to 0.154 will hurt debt position owners, but maybe  this is not avoidable, and is better than continuing the offpeg.

we have hurt bitCNY holders for the future of BTS, can't we hurt debt position owners for the same?

actually I don't think it's easy to get enough voting power that support this, maybe it's better to do the same for bitUSD?
Finally after we drop out of top 100 you realize that scamming BTS, bitUSD & bitCNY holders and degrading the BSIP/BAIP/Voting processes has been extremely damaging to Bitshares, great!

The answer isn't to double down on scamming via BSIP76. End the fraudulent bitasset pegs.

185

Pure delusion to expect a fraction of historic volunteerism when the committee scammed tens of thousands of users via bitassets.

If we could see tomorrow, what of your plans?
No one can live in sorrow, ask all your friends
Times that you took in stride, they're back in demand
I was the one who was washing blood off your hands

Don't you cry tonight
I still love you, baby
Don't you cry tonight
Don't you cry tonight
There's a heaven above you baby
And don't you cry tonight

I know the things you wanted, they're not what you have
With all the people talking, it's driving you mad
If I was standing by you, how would you feel
Knowing your love's decided, and all love is real?

 (C) 1991 Guns N' Roses - Don't Cry
https://youtu.be/zRIbf6JqkNc
We're doing song refences now? Cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8wtKadWIfA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hicC53AhZ6Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdVFIFnDcrU

186
General Discussion / Re: Liquidity Mining(main thread)
« on: July 30, 2020, 08:01:05 pm »
I've approved the recent proposals.

However, IMHO the current rules / parameters are far from optimal, since the cost / revenue ratio is still high (around 10x), which is a critical reason that led to the pause of the (former) MM contest and update of rules and parameters. That being said, the liquidity mining in the current form is not significantly better than the (former) MM contest. The committee should seek for ways to improve the situation, E.G. optimize the rules and/or the parameters, promote to attract more traders and trading activiaties and etc, to gain more avenue for the platform.

Due to the reason I stated above, if the committee fails to act effectively, I'll stop approving new proposals after 31st July.
Glad to see you come to your senses, that this insider platform scam provides no economic benefits.
BTC and other major cryptos have risen significantly in recent days, BTS remains within the scam threshold price range.

Pretty pathetic to see the rebranding of market making to mining considering the misuse of mining terminology by cnvote recently, sad.

187
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 4.0 投票机制变化
« on: July 30, 2020, 07:58:28 pm »
Why didn't you support BSIP 22 if you want vote decay? https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0022.md

188
Bitshares lottery was the mechanism Dan was using to finance Bitshares dev.

We were promised BTS according to the date we sent the BTC in.

What happened to those claims?

P.S.  The wallet was missing, only recently recovered...that's why!
Lottery had nothing to do with BTS, are you sure you're not talking about 'angelshares' ?

189
When can we expect any economic benefit from cn involvement? We've seen the continuous slide to irrelevancy in the last few years with cn's greater meddling, now BTS is outwith the top 100 on coinmarketcap!

So give us a date, when will we see any benefit from your involvement?

190
General Discussion / Re: FIRE THESE PEOPLE!!
« on: July 19, 2020, 07:21:48 pm »
looks like the website is new, it's no longer covering up for cn-vote's bitasset scam which is good

191
General Discussion / Re: Liquidity Mining(main thread)
« on: July 19, 2020, 07:20:38 pm »
lmao cn has to BRIBE people to trade on BTS DEX after destroying the integrity of the platform

including the scam bitassets in this bribery is a waste of time, they're illegitimate due to cn's fractional reserve debt scam.

192
lottery was a scam, protoshares you need to change to btsx then to bts2.0

why wait so long? pretty dumb

193
General Discussion / Re: Congrats to 105 on CMC
« on: July 19, 2020, 07:13:36 pm »
cn-vote taking bts from top 20 to 200+ in no time, sad times.

194
This is just an Announcement, not begging at all. Actually the donation was only in CN community and didn't expect any participation from outside of CN community, but I encouraged cn-vote to publish the post on forum as I always want to bridge the communication gap between east and west community though the the situation is not good.




Great Job!

Advertising is very important for the whole system! This is really important!

I saw how the Chinese community supports the Bitshares! What the Chinese community has done - Inspires! Thanks you!

For our part, we launched advertising to attract new users. Users receive a reward in BTS to their account when they register on the exchange and report this to exchange telegram chat!

Let's make Bitshares famous and profitable together!

XBTS has done great job, I really appreciate that. Worker Proposal mechanism is not as good as BM expected, as it discourage volunteers to work for BitShares. I miss the very early days of BitShares when a lot of people work for BTS without asking for anything from community.
Pure delusion to expect a fraction of historic volunteerism when the committee scammed tens of thousands of users via bitassets.

195
This is just an Announcement, not begging at all. Actually the donation was only in CN community and didn't expect any participation from outside of CN community, but I encouraged cn-vote to publish the post on forum as I always want to bridge the communication gap between east and west community though the the situation is not good.

It's not an announcement, rather a call to action for users to donate to the beggars. If this was only for the CN community then why is the post partially in english and posted outwith the chinese sub-forum?

Indeed the gap between east and west has been irreversibly fractured, translating bad posts isn't a solution.

Anyways, you can not represent western community, you can keep being a troll but you are just yourself, I know cn-vote has supporters outside of cn community, so cnvote announce it here just to let people know that there are still a bunch of guys are willing to work for bitshares for free.

I do not claim to represent the western community, however cn-vote does claim to represent all of CN & by scamming imply that the whole chinese community are also scammers.

Who is left working on BTS for free? The majority of devs are now gone because of CN, fact.

I would recommend you to defeat cn-vote by convincing people to buy more BTS than cn-vote, instead of attacking based on biased facts. You are wasting your own time.

I cannot in good faith recommend people buy BTS given the severe corruption at the hands of CN & CN-Vote.

What's a biased fact? That CN has scammed tens of thousands of core bitshares users via fake price feeds? That's truth.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 68