1
OpenLedger / Re: 1000 Vimples, Retail Value 1000 EUR from 1000 BTS incl. FREE Lifetime Membership
« on: January 14, 2020, 12:01:24 pm »
Retail value zero more like.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
OpenLedger / Re: 5% of Total Supply Giveaway Trading Competition - BitShares Invited!
« on: January 14, 2020, 11:55:27 am »
*************** EDITED BY DL ***************
Warning: Please keep content of posts as adequate and appropriate for public. Any disputes relay by PM, email or appropriate legal channels.
Chee®s
Warning: Please keep content of posts as adequate and appropriate for public. Any disputes relay by PM, email or appropriate legal channels.
Chee®s
3
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 27, 2019, 09:24:33 am »
Bump - Reminder to not deposit at OpenLedger, you risk loosing your funds.
4
General Discussion / Re: Repost: Market making contest, stage one
« on: December 23, 2019, 04:43:50 pm »
Yeah admittedly its not a big increase, I just don't feel there is much benefit to group 5 & 6 but like you say every little counts and better to have them than not.
5
General Discussion / Re: Repost: Market making contest, stage one
« on: December 23, 2019, 09:38:46 am »
IMO group 5 & group 6 should be removed and their reward given to group 1. Group 5 & 6 dont really provide much value whereas group 1 provides great value. Group 5 & 6 provide the ability to buy and sell between 5 and 10% above or below market value, its not appealing to anyone.
6
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 22, 2019, 12:06:17 pm »
Instead of putting the onus on others to prove your intentions, why don't you just openly declare that what OpenLedger is doing is wrong if you do not support them. The majority of OpenLedgers users holding open.xxx assets can no longer withdraw. OpenLedger have ripped off their user base and a massive chunk of the BitShares community.
7
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 22, 2019, 09:20:12 am »
Apparently anything thule doesnt agree with is fud. He deflects from the fact openledger are stealing millions in user funds to argue about the definition of an exit scam whilst trying to label me a fudster for making people aware of the situation so they dont loose their money, a true politician at work. He doesnt care about the money you might loose depositing BTC or ETH at openledger, he only cares about halting the spread of bad news in case it pushes BTS price down further.
8
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 22, 2019, 08:56:04 am »
People getting caught up in the definition of exit scam need to wake up. It is clear that openledger assets are not fully backed, why else would they not take part in the MM contest where you have to prove your assets are backed. They have clearly been spending user funds to pay for their new vpledger project and now need access to more user funds to continue to pay for it. Hence the raised withdrawal allowances stopping people from withdrawing and giving openledger the ability to spend and no reason to back the asset. Openledger are stealing users funds, simple as that, be cautious of anyone telling you otherwise.
9
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 22, 2019, 08:49:50 am »
How is suddenly charging a 100x higher fee when withdrawing just 1 Bitcoin and preventing the majority of users to withdraw their funds due to crazy minimum withdrawal amounts not a form of a scam? Both these actions are even illegal as customers need to be informed before such drastic changes are done by EU law. And what if they charged a withdrawal fee of 99.9%, how would you call that?
Don't get me wrong but do you ever read TOS when using a "financial" service ?
No court speaks in favour of people who do not read TOS
Law > ToS (especially in EU) and courts constantly invalidate clauses from ToS and fine companies for putting illegal ones into it.
Thule conveniently forgot to quote the part of openledgers terms of service that say exactly what you have just said to suit his narrative.
"If any provision of these Terms is deemed unlawful, void, or for any reason unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed severable from these Terms and will not affect the validity and enforceability of any remaining provisions."
10
General Discussion / Re: The Statistics of blocktrades send to binance-bts-1
« on: December 20, 2019, 10:34:51 pm »Can you blame them? They have to fund their new venture and they are holding an asset that's depreciating so quickly in value it will soon be at zero. I guess this just shows how irrelevant worker funding was as a contribution to the price decline.
Thank you come in and say something. What you say is very interesting and useful for bts community, thank you.
I just show the data of blockchain, and point out who is the biggest seller in bts market to the community.
How to sell bts is the freedom of stan, if there have errors in blockchain, show he is not the biggest dumper, you can point out directly.
I think this is the biggest thing for bts community this year, other things had been insignificant in front of it, so i show these data to community.
If this hurt your feeling, very sorry about that.
If the market price is right, 1 bts=10 beos.
Lol ok
11
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 20, 2019, 10:17:05 pm »
Wow. Not only does thule support the firing of majority of bitshares devs and bringing development to a halt but he now also seems to support openledger stealing the people of this communities funds. Wow.
12
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 20, 2019, 12:59:58 pm »What a disgrace. A flat 5% withdrawal fee? Insane minimum withdrawal amounts (0.1 BTC, 5 ETH, 40XMR, ...)?? Are they crazy or is that their own form of an exit scam? As they are properly registered as a company in denmark I hope someone takes this case to the appropriate authorities.
I have reported them to the Danish FSA but the more people who do the same the better, I encourage everyone with trapped funds or not to report them.
13
General Discussion / Re: The Statistics of blocktrades send to binance-bts-1
« on: December 20, 2019, 12:45:49 pm »
Can you blame them? They have to fund their new venture and they are holding an asset that's depreciating so quickly in value it will soon be at zero. I guess this just shows how irrelevant worker funding was as a contribution to the price decline.
15
General Discussion / Re: CN-VOTE Statement on Market making contest
« on: December 10, 2019, 09:04:35 am »
Seeing as CN vote and allies make all the decisions these days, why dont you sort the pegs out on these assets first, no ones interested in trading these shit coins. Also worth mentioning that gateways have to prove that their assets are fully backed, when you can do the same for these shit coins then maybe it can be considered.
To be clear, when a user can settle 1bitUSD for 1USD worth of BTS and 1bitCNY for 1CNY worth of BTS, then they are fully backed. Until then, under no circumstance should these assets be included in the MM contest.
To be clear, when a user can settle 1bitUSD for 1USD worth of BTS and 1bitCNY for 1CNY worth of BTS, then they are fully backed. Until then, under no circumstance should these assets be included in the MM contest.
