Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Crypto Kong

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
61
General Discussion / Re: Marketing Proposal
« on: November 23, 2018, 06:55:19 pm »
Quote from: matle85 on November 23, 2018, 12:56:25 pm
This sounds like a good initiative Kong - there is quite a lot of disagreement over where efforts are best spent to get 'mainstream' attention so phasing it seems logical.

I think twitter is a good way of reaching people, the amount of people on there who think Bitshares is a dead project is just insane.

Will the articles be on medium?

The articles can be written on whichever platform the community thinks is best, Medium is a good choice IMO. I am also happy to have promoted tweets come from the BitShares Twitter account, if they are willing to work with us on this. I'm open to any and all suggestions.

62
General Discussion / Marketing Proposal
« on: November 22, 2018, 04:59:14 pm »
There has been a lot of talk recently about marketing campaigns for BitShares. Gabriel and myself are considering creating a small proposal. Some of you know me from my involvement in DEXBot and may have read some of the articles I've written about BitShares. Gabriel is the DEXBot website creator and runs the DEXBot twitter account.

There are a lot of ideas about what we should and shouldn't do. It is my opinion we should start off with some very small proposals, gauge their success and decide whether to proceed or not. This may entice others to get involved and hopefully get the ball rolling on bigger and better ideas.

The proposal will be a simple one. We will create some articles about BitShares and start a paid for twitter advertising campaign. I was thinking the first proposal would be for 3-5 articles which would be promoted on twitter. We can always re use the articles and create another proposal to promote them on other sites such as Facebook.

So really I have two questions. Is the community willing to pass a proposal to do this and if so what subjects or topics would you like us to cover?

I am happy to have all articles checked by proxies before release.


63
General Discussion / Re: suggestion for an committee controlled open market operation fund
« on: November 21, 2018, 10:28:04 am »
Can we please get a report on results from this operation?

64
General Discussion / Re: Remove "asset owner can transfer asset back to himself" on stablecoins?
« on: November 08, 2018, 09:10:06 am »
Tough one... I'm actually quite unsure where I stand on this one... How many people is 50%+1 for commitee majority? Less than 10 I presume. Its a very small number of people that governments can put pressure on to seize assets. I dont like that at all. On the other side of things... its good to have options to be able to stay compliant. I lean towards my first point than my second but i am in the middle.

65
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Marketing efforts for Bitshares
« on: October 25, 2018, 09:06:14 am »
Would be good to include DEXBot in any marketing efforts. People will be very interested to learn they can use free decentralised trading software too. It's another good selling point of BitShares and will help to pull in new users.

66
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Bitshares: Margin Trading and Swap contracts on the DEX discussion
« on: October 14, 2018, 08:25:21 pm »
Fantastic idea, if it can be implemented it should be. This would drive up demand for BTS and smart coins. 👍

67
Stakeholder Proposals / BSIP22
« on: September 29, 2018, 06:12:41 pm »
I'd like to restart discussion on this BSIP. Seems to make a lot of sense and I would love to see it implemented... also seems to have been forgotten about.

https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/742f1a617f22fda1aec11985628d2f8860be2a23/bsip-0022.md

68
General Discussion / Re: is it a goode idea to disable force settlement and black swan for bitCNY?
« on: September 17, 2018, 09:05:43 pm »
I think the amount of outrage at this proposal is quite clear from posts in this thread and @bitcrab should withdraw it and rethink how else our smartcoins can be improved. This idea is a no go.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk


69
General Discussion / Re: is it a goode idea to disable force settlement and black swan for bitCNY?
« on: September 15, 2018, 06:29:42 pm »
Its not just the price that should be kept constant and stable on a stable coin but the rules too. You cant keep changing the rules as you please. I agree that we dont have to stick with the original vision and should try and improve but removing global settlement is not it. Any changes should be made across all assetts too not just bitCNY. There should be a standard that represents all smart coins not a different set of rules for each coin.

70
General Discussion / I Am Making A New Market, Come Join Me!
« on: August 12, 2018, 10:00:08 am »
I have started making the Easydex.ETH-BTS market and the Easydex.ETH-Open.ETH market. Those who make other similar markets such as Open.ETH-GDEX.ETH should come and join me and get this market kick started, creating more opportunities for market makers and arbitrage traders :)

71
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Removing Bitcrab from the committee controlled open market operation fund
« on: August 08, 2018, 07:23:16 am »
Bitcrab should never have been involved in this operation down to his track record of constant margin calls from his personal accounts. If that wasnt proof enough of bad management I don't know what is. There is also now a conflict of interest with the spring fund and he should have volunteered to step down, failing that other members of the multi sig should have removed and replaced him.

I have said from the beggining ratios are not high enough and already ratios are at 2 which is far too close for comfort. How can everyone involved not have seen this coming.

I actually think the fund is a good idea so credit to bitcrab there but he shouldnt have been involved and ratios should have been much higher. I respect bitcrab and all hes done but this was clear from the beggining and the community is as much to blame as him for jumping on the bandwaggon in order to pump the BTS price.

I hope everyone learns from mistakes made here.

72
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: July 31, 2018, 08:42:13 am »
Anyone interested in running bots should checkout dexbot. Telegram room t.me/dexbotbts or website dexbot.info

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk


73
General Discussion / Re: Best way to convert 60,000 BTS to Fiat (US Dollars) quickly?
« on: July 27, 2018, 10:58:04 am »
Speak to jacob at easydex

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk


74
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [BBF][Worker Renewal 1] Deploy and maintain BitShares infrastructure
« on: July 04, 2018, 05:44:56 pm »
I'll look forward to getting involved with the stress test, done right, co ordinated properly and reported properly could end up being a fantastic piece of marketing and get a lot of attention

75
General Discussion / Re: [proposal discussion] Unification of same gateway IOUs
« on: March 24, 2018, 09:39:54 am »
Quote from: abit on March 21, 2018, 08:15:00 pm
Another approach is market making among these UIA's, it's safe as long as the gateways are still trustworthy, and everyone can do it. Combined with the arbitrage bots running in the market, real liquidity will be improved.

Better if UI can show combined market depth. Best if the back end supports auto-bridging: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/45.

I'm gonna start looking into making the market on similar assets at different gateways, good idea. Thanks

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8

Page created in 0.205 seconds with 23 queries.