Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BTSMoon

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
1
中文(Chinese) / 比特股4.0: 一个群魔乱舞的时代
« on: August 18, 2020, 07:11:29 pm »
比特股4.0激活后,各方势力为了自身利益互相抹黑,扯后腿,发布假消息,制造分裂,可能是因为4=四=死,如果以后还有发布新版本应该跳过4这个字。

2
第一个永久锁仓的账号已经在昨晚出现了,59天后任何没永久锁仓的账号将失去投票权,不管是抵押的BTS,挂单BTS,流动BTS,还是已经锁720天的BTS,都会失去投票权。 如果大家今天赶紧的久锁仓一个BTS,那么空窗期只有1天,不然会更久。

locked >>> get_object 1.18.2
[{
    "id": "1.18.2",
    "account": "1.2.32061",
    "target_type": "lock_forever",
    "amount": {
      "amount": 100000000,
      "asset_id": "1.3.0"
    },
    "current_type": "liquid",
    "status": "charging",
    "value": 100000000,
    "next_auto_update_time": "2020-08-14T15:17:48",
    "next_type_downgrade_time": "1969-12-31T23:59:59"
  }
]

3
中文(Chinese) / Re: BAIP6投票操作一赏
« on: June 29, 2020, 08:32:14 am »
投票不是自由的嘛?还是这些账号被黑了?

4
中文(Chinese) / Re: “贡献者评价体系”的思考
« on: June 29, 2020, 08:29:52 am »
这贡献者评价体系看起来很好,但是实行起来很难做到公平公正, 例如你知道北美,欧洲和RUDEX做过什么事嘛?知道他们多少人贡献过什么嘛?如果你不知道那就做不到公平公正了,如果需要他们告诉你,那么就是变相中心化了。 如果只评价国内了,那就是你格局太小了,比特股是全世界的,不是某一个国家或者地区的。

所谓灵活的评价更容易被滥用,例如给BTS.AI 10分,但是给其他游览器5分。




5
通常国家都是喜欢适度通膨的,没有国家喜欢通缩,通缩比过度通膨更难搞。

目前很多国家大开水喉是因为COVID19带来的经济通缩预期。如果国家在COVID19其间还大举加税,其实是找死,大量公司倒闭,大量人员失业,没钱就到处抢,经商环境变差,治安败坏。

6
General Discussion / Re: Crisis which bitshares is going through
« on: June 07, 2020, 09:21:07 am »


Vote for Exit Scam Gateway. Corrupted Proxies? Insiders Deals?

7
The asset owner is currently against the price feed manipulation of bitUSD and CNY, hence the creation of this new asset HONEST, I suggest you read the details of the asset before making your judgement.
1. The asset owner is not anonymous he is well known in the bitshares community his ID is litepresence on bitshares telegram you can contact him if you have queries to his assets.
2. There are only three price feed producers because of lack of interest, the assets price have never been manipulated since creation either
3. The wash trading you are currently seeing is called skeletus in the asset description, it's meant to make the asset chart have a similar pattern to what it represents, it is being done until more users begin to trade it organically.

1. Do you have his photo? If he run away, can you help HONEST Holders to sue him? Anonymous itself is not a big problem but a single anonymous person as Asset Owner is VERY VERY HIGH RISK for HONEST Holders & Borrowers.

2. Lack of interest because how investors/traders trust a Single Anonymous Person as Asset Owner? Even this guy is not Anonymous, putting money on one single person is VERY VERY HIGH RISK for HONEST Holders & Borrowers.

3.  The Asset description wrote about Skeletus for Wash Trading and then you see it no problem because it HONESTLY WASH TRADING. Then Bitcrab is HONESTLY Set Price Threshold because is written down too in BSIP. So HONEST Asset Owner no different than Bitcrab, we can call him Bitcrab No.2, maybe the person behind actually is Bitcrab.

8
Any estimates how much it would cost to just get the most urgent done ?

Depends how you define urgent. Node connectivity seems to be a prominent issue.

The concern is UI team fail to identify what need to be done and how much the budget.

The Core worker have list down what need to be done and maximum hours for each BSIPs.

Quite different situation. Please read the UI worker proposal, intention is laid out there.

Core is following BSIPs, second step is to make UI compatible to the changes / new features of core 4.0

Nobody like to pay for something without knowing the price and actual product/result. If someone create a worker proposal say Make Bitshares Great Again with 1 Million BTS/Day, who want to vote for it?

UI team more like self oriented (Pay me and I fix any small random bugs and develop some new features from Core) and BTS++ team more focus on community need(Features that highly demanded now and Bugs that blocking users having good user experience). If UI team fail to learn from BTS++ team, then nothing will change.

9
Based on my observation, HONEST.Assets Are High Risk MPA Assets and is Not Trustless:

1. The Asset Owner "user85" is anonymous developer. The account "user85" is not a multi-signature accounts and if the owner decided to run away or no longer maintain the assets, all HONEST.Assets holders and borrowers will lose their money.

2. Only 3 Price Feed Publishers at this moment and one of them is user85. If anything go wrong or user85 the Asset Owner decided to add another 2 his own Price Feed Publishers, he is able to manipulate the price such as increase the price feed x 100 and dump all HONEST.Assets to the market. HONEST.Assets holders and borrowers will lose their money.

3. The Selling Point of HONEST.Assets is about "HONEST" but the Asset Owner demonstrate Dishonest practice like wash trading.




10
Any estimates how much it would cost to just get the most urgent done ?

Depends how you define urgent. Node connectivity seems to be a prominent issue.

The concern is UI team fail to identify what need to be done and how much the budget.

The Core worker have list down what need to be done and maximum hours for each BSIPs.

11
理事会和参与的网关如果参加这个奖励大赛拿奖励,只会让人觉得自肥,应该排除掉有利益冲突的人拿奖励(可以参加但是不拿奖励)。
只要规则定清楚了,公平公正,谁都可以参加,为什么参加了不能拿奖励?
再说了,想参加的建个小号谁知道是谁。

你觉得规则有问题就怼规则,看不出问题就不要瞎指挥。自肥?你说说看,怎么肥起来?

网关唯一的优势在于自身手续费减免。当然更重要的前提是不发假币。
理事会毫无优势。并且理事会也不拿工资,白干。

有利益冲突的不能参加比赛是常识,当裁判也能参加比赛时,这比赛还有意义吗?如果理事会坚持要参赛,那需要让第三方审查了。当然建个小号只要没被发现也行的,那是本事。

这个比赛最大受益人其实就是网关,有免费推广还可以赚取更多手续费,提币费,现在挂几个单还可以跟其他参赛者分享奖励。你有想过BTS持有人的感受吗?帮网关推广还送钱给他们然后BTS持有人得到什么?微不足道的挂单和转账费。。。或者说什么都没得到因为没分红啊。。。如果说弄深度,大饼也可以被插针,BTS有可能比大饼的深度更深吗?BTS有熔断价已经很厉害了,管你资金多少,熔断价以下的插都插不进。

如果做的营销活动主要受益的不是BTS持有人,那么一两次之后公会和社区就很难支持这类活动了,这跟希腊会议一样的道理,我也提醒过他,但是他还是我行我素,然后半途被投出去了才做出检讨,何必呢!


12
支持!赶快搞吧!

13
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于组建营销推广团队可行性的讨论
« on: October 14, 2019, 04:05:49 pm »
营销团可以用推荐系统赚钱。
能做事不代表有流量

去跟曾经申请资金池的团队交流一下吧,bts.ai团队, BTS++钱包团队,然后再想想要不要组建你这个团队。

14
理事会和参与的网关如果参加这个奖励大赛拿奖励,只会让人觉得自肥,应该排除掉有利益冲突的人拿奖励(可以参加但是不拿奖励)。

15
中文(Chinese) / Re: BitShares 线上峰会 (2019年10月10日)
« on: October 14, 2019, 03:49:26 pm »
这种诉苦的线上峰会,搞一次就好了,不要再来了。

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7