31
General Discussion / Re: bitshares.exchange not pointing to DEX ?
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:58:47 am »
Because it wasn't paid for, yet ..
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
General Discussion / Re: Committee Fund Operation Review
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:53:00 am »
As in the past, I do *not* support using community funds for leverage.
33
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] bitspark-delegate Professional Team for Block Production
« on: October 17, 2019, 10:22:42 am »
34
General Discussion / Re: Committee proposals to change price feed producers of bitCNY and bitUSD
« on: October 16, 2019, 12:26:42 pm »The initial price feed producers would be active witnesses, they'll not get paid in the beginning.
Are you 100% certain of this? I don't want to end up with expiring feeds if this was not the case!
35
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitUSD feed threshold
« on: October 15, 2019, 08:27:22 am »
@Sapiens has been banned for 3 days for his use of language.
I would like to remind everyone that people in the forum are still humans. Verbal attacks will not be tolerated.
I would like to remind everyone that people in the forum are still humans. Verbal attacks will not be tolerated.
36
General Discussion / BitSharestalk.org - now fast again
« on: October 07, 2019, 03:20:39 pm »
Hi everyone,
please excuse the latency issues recently.
We are getting more traffic than usual which has led to PHP resource restriction taking effect.
Those restriction have been improved and the forums should be back to speed.
please excuse the latency issues recently.
We are getting more traffic than usual which has led to PHP resource restriction taking effect.
Those restriction have been improved and the forums should be back to speed.
37
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Draft] BSIP78: MLP (Market Liquidity Pool)
« on: October 01, 2019, 10:27:07 am »
Interesting read!
38
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:bit.professor
« on: September 26, 2019, 12:30:48 pm »Welcome to the proxies!
39
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« on: September 11, 2019, 12:36:57 pm »Upvoted today Bitshares UI worker
I upvoted Bitshares UI worker for 7 days so there will be enough funds to release the new updated UI.
The updated UI is urgently needed since it also contains the fix for market fee claim error and more important the cookie session for the refferal system which is a major point for any refferal offer.
40
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] - Decentralized 2019 Sponsoring and Partnership
« on: September 09, 2019, 11:05:53 am »No matter what? That's nice of youWell, i don't *need* to talk bitshares. The VIPs there will be fun to talk no matter the topic.
Also, if bitshares cancels the sponsorship, I'll certainly not tag myself as a bitshares-guy - that would be idiotic, right?
41
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] - Decentralized 2019 Sponsoring and Partnership
« on: September 09, 2019, 09:05:05 am »
I'll be there too
42
General Discussion / Re: BitShares Newsletter / 比特股快报 - 09/05/2019 (English & 中文）
« on: September 06, 2019, 09:18:48 am »vote is shi*t, holder is shi*t?You decreased you skill in reading by 10 points.
43
General Discussion / Re: Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: September 05, 2019, 04:13:15 pm »
Clear argument against Indian workers doing core programming @ 1$/hr:
They are in the wrong timezone, shit like this only happens when Europe or U.S. people are awake
/s
They are in the wrong timezone, shit like this only happens when Europe or U.S. people are awake
/s
44
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Reduce onboarding registrar
« on: September 05, 2019, 01:07:14 pm »
Since that worker is voted out and hardly even pays for the infrastructure i provide for it (let alone all the coding to offer detailed analysis on the registered accounts), I cannot put more time and efforts into this faucet.
Maybe some hobbyist has fun digging into elasticsearch, but I have to feed a family.
Maybe some hobbyist has fun digging into elasticsearch, but I have to feed a family.
45
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Reduce onboarding registrar
« on: September 04, 2019, 07:24:58 am »Tell me, if registering accounts cost BTS, and the faucet doesn't earn BTS from referral reward, how long do you think this can be self-sustained? (ignoring the expense for hosting the faucet even).I need to tell you, if registration costs BTS?
The onboarding account does still earns 80% from BTS and market fees for every non-LTM signup, when registrar = 0%. This is not enough to cover the 2 cents registration fee and worker costs?
The bts++ team is generating 5 figures only from the market fee share per month!
Here is the thing: The worker was proposed in a certain way (defined in the worker proposal).
Changing terms in the middle is not good business. If you want to have it 0%, it may be viable long term, but a subsequent worker needs to propose it that way.
This worker and its parameters are set in stone.
