Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - xeroc

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 851
Technical Support / Re: New fee schedule not correctly charging fees
« on: February 19, 2019, 01:25:03 pm »
The balance id that stores your refund is in your account objected and is called "cashback_vb"

General Discussion / Re: BTS volume on Binance...
« on: February 15, 2019, 07:20:50 am »
Confirmed ... 90M BTS volume on binance .. wow

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Core Team 2019
« on: February 15, 2019, 07:17:53 am »
As a proxy voting for this worker, I do fully understand the concerns raised by @dexy - I came to ask myself the very same questions.
My conclusions is that this is the cost for an **independent** development team. If we (the BTS community) wanted this cheaper, we'd
need to hire a company to work on this. Developers in that company would earn less (probabably about 60-80$/hr) and will be managed
by the company. But then, don't expect that this company will invoice only the rates of those developers. That's not how a software
house can survive for long, profits need to be made for the company too, hence, you are looking at a rate that is at least as high as
current core devs'. And even if you found a company that was willing to contribute for less, I still prefer to have our own team that's
knowledgable trusted and loyal to the BitShares community. Totally fine with paying for that.

General Discussion / Re: Review of OMO
« on: February 15, 2019, 07:14:02 am »
I agree with plan A.

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Reference faucet via
« on: February 14, 2019, 08:39:49 am »
Thanks everyone for your support. The reference faucet worker is active now and account creation continues as usual.

General Discussion / Re: Review of OMO
« on: February 13, 2019, 09:17:08 am »
Well, at least there was a lesson learned ..

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: cryptobridge
« on: February 13, 2019, 09:16:08 am »

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:baozi - proxy for anti-dilution
« on: February 13, 2019, 09:15:55 am »
Also worth noting: The committee has created 6 REFUND workers that enable more granular spending of funds:

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: February 13, 2019, 09:14:06 am »
I support the candidacy of y new committee member
I'd like to hear more details but think that committee can use some fresh blood

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Bitshares UI Worker Proposal for 2019
« on: February 12, 2019, 08:26:38 am »

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] CITADEL Desktop 2019
« on: February 12, 2019, 08:26:25 am »

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: February 12, 2019, 08:26:07 am »
I just voted for:
* the new UI worker
* the Citadel worker

General Discussion / Re: hitBTC having BTS withdraw issues
« on: February 11, 2019, 08:03:32 am »
Interesting ... they seem to not have done their homework about how to setup an instance in low-ram mode.

For commercial grade support, they can surely ask for a quote from [email protected]
Or simply ask the community here - there are a bunch of knowledgeable people around

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: February 11, 2019, 08:01:09 am »
Hi Xeroc,

You have removed your support for my witness sahkan-bitshares on 20 DEC 2018 (the day the blockchain crashed). I just wanted to request that you consider re-voting my witness. Thank you for you past support!
revoted. You've done a good job so far .. as it later turned out, the crash on december was not due to witnesses not upgrading their software in time - which was what i believed when i remove my vote from your witness (among others)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 851