Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - xeroc

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 859
Technical Support / Re: Make bitsharesjs work with a testnet
« on: January 27, 2020, 12:42:51 pm »
Just replace the inital `BTS` with `TEST`. Pubkey will be valid and accessible through your private key.

General Discussion / Selling bitshares.* top-level domains
« on: January 09, 2020, 09:19:07 am »
Hi everyone,

I just realized that I own a few bitshares.* domains that I don't find the time to fill with life:


If you are interested in obtaining one or more of these, please send your offers to     info [email protected]_

General Discussion / Re: BBF https certificate expired
« on: January 08, 2020, 04:08:53 pm »
What URL are we talking about

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« on: December 18, 2019, 10:28:14 am »
In 2 weeks time, don't be surprised when Alex turns around and does other stuff.

General Discussion / Re: [Info] BBF paying based on fiat
« on: December 12, 2019, 07:31:03 am »
Promises have been broken by BitShares' bitassets, as Peter mentioned. Don't be surprised that BBF keeps its promise to remove currency risk from workers.
It's quite hilarious that people don't even understand what kind of problems they caused by faking bitasset prices.

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Reference faucet via
« on: December 11, 2019, 01:42:00 pm »
Just noticed that you're not voting for the worker either.
I should :D
Just saying, if it became a for-profit service, it's no longer appropriate to be the only faucet listed in the "official" web wallet. Also, in that case, please use another account. IMO the community has the right to deal with future referral income accumulated to the account, that said, the account's owner authorities should contain only committee-account if not yet configured like so.
I'll leave that to the committee to change.

The underlying accounts will surely have to change.

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Reference faucet via
« on: December 04, 2019, 10:52:49 am »
Resurrecting this old thread as the reference faucet is currently not approved.

As of today, the reference faucet worker is not approved. This is not a big deal as the worker has some funds left to (probably) pay for the rest of its runtime (end of January 2020).
However, the fact that one of the only profitable workers is not approved by the community makes me question if the community appreciates this service and whether it is worthwhile
setting up another worker to fund expenses after January 2020.

Currently, the worker has a balance of >160k BTS and >12k bitCNY with >9k BTS, >2k bitCNY, >100bitUSD and a couple other assets still in vesting balances (others have been burned in the past).
These numbers stand against the costs of  280€/month.

I'll leave the decision to the shareholders if it is worth setting up a new worker to have these profits directed to the community (by burning).
Please express your opinion by approving the existing worker. In case it is not approved by January 2020, I read that the community no longer
prefers to pay for the service so that a subsequent worker is meaningless.

In case the community does not appreciate this service, I will request the BBF to continue operating the reference faucet as a for-profit service and have expenses paid from those profits.
The use of left over funds will be at the discretion of BBF.

Disclaimer: I do **NOT** talk for the BBF but deal with operations of the reference faucet as well as the corresponding worker.

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Decentralized 2019 Recap
« on: November 07, 2019, 01:51:30 pm »
This was a ton of fun!

Thanks for organizing it!

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: October 21, 2019, 11:20:14 am »
I support the following BSIPs:

    BSIP 73: Match force-settlement orders with margin calls and limit orders
    BSIP 72: Tanks and Taps: A General Solution for Smart Contract Asset Handling
    BSIP 70: Peer-to-Peer Leveraged Trading
    BSIP 69: Additional Assert Predicates
    BSIP 64: Optional HTLC preimage length, HASH160 addition, and memo field
    BSIP 62: Close margin position
    BSIP 61: Operation to Update Limit Orders
    BSIP 57: Managed Vesting Balances
    BSIP 47: Vote Proxies for Different Referendum Categories and explicit voting operation
    BSIP 45: Add BitAsset as Backing Collateral flag/permission
    BSIP 39: Automatically approve proposals by the proposer
    BSIP 22: Vote Decay for Witnesses, Committee members & Proxies

Also, I am not 100% sure vote-decay will change things to the better, but I am willing to support this experiment.

Graveyard / Re: Buy Buy Buy
« on: October 21, 2019, 11:02:02 am »
If you sell them at 0 USD, I'll take them - as many as you have.
Until then, this sort of posts are just meaningless to most educated readers.

General Discussion / Re: not pointing to DEX ?
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:58:47 am »
Because it wasn't paid for, yet ..

General Discussion / Re: Committee Fund Operation Review
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:53:00 am »
As in the past, I do *not* support using community funds for leverage.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 859