Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xeroc

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 841
1
General Discussion / Re: Margin Call stopped working
« on: September 21, 2018, 03:57:42 pm »
When you are talking about the price feed going "some direction", you need to also define how you define your price.
What is "down" for CNY/BTS is "up" for BTS/CNY!!

2
SeerChain / Re: It rocks! SEER becomes one of the member of GBAC
« on: September 21, 2018, 03:56:22 pm »
+5%
SEER seems to be developing quite nicely. Congratulations on your achievements!

3
Technical Support / Re: Handshake status 429 Too Many Request
« on: September 18, 2018, 05:24:30 pm »
Use a different node...infrastructure nodes are rate-limited
Actually, they are not (yet)
However, the pybitshares library uses .eu's node which does have rate-limitations.

4
*To Mods.
I use my right for free speech and expressing myself in the way i like to.

Let me make this very clear to you and everyone else, right away. This forum is operated by the BitShares Blockchain Foundation and as such lives under Dutch law.
Your 'free speech' has been granted to you by your government, is limited to public law and does NOT apply in this forum which is privately operated.
Consequently, you can (and will be) lectured by means available to the operator, if they so chose, in case you continue personal rampage. Your tone is unacceptable not just for this community and the desire to cooperate to solve current issues (which constantly change) but is also unacceptable for the internet as a whole.

Provided that I dont speak for the BBF, i cannot give you an official warning, but rest assured that this is escalated to the proper authorities.

So, please stick to basic netiquette or go somewhere else.


5
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: September 18, 2018, 03:12:10 pm »
Is it true that you were weeks before informed about the plan to remove global settlement and didn't talked about it to the community ?
That you guys are deciding it in a small circle ?
I told you (in a PM) the same story I tell everyone: if they want my vote they need to ask in public. I dont do backdoor deals and you very well know that, unless you forgot.

Furthermore, please show me where i made a comment about removal of global settlement other than in this post. The topic was raised to me 4 days ago and I have not taken any time to even built an opinion about it as i am on vacation and do not read up on everyones opinion.

My opinion about Bsip42 has been expressed here in the forums. You can find it in my posting history. If you dont know how, please ask the community, they'll gladly point it out to you.

In the meantime, i am back to vacation.

6
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Bitshares UI Renewal
« on: September 05, 2018, 04:45:40 pm »
+5%
This is excellent news!! Looking forward to using beet more actively!

7
Yes .. any asset can be used for "vesting" ...

Code: [Select]
get_prototype_operation vesting_balance_create_operation
[
  32,{
    "fee": {
      "amount": 0,
      "asset_id": "1.3.0"
    },
    "creator": "1.2.0",                                                                           
    "owner": "1.2.0",                                                                             
    "amount": {                                                                                   
      "amount": 0,                                                                                 
      "asset_id": "1.3.0"                                                                         
    },                                                                                             
    "policy": [                                                                                   
      0,{                                                                                         
        "begin_timestamp": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",                                                                     
        "vesting_cliff_seconds": 0,                                                                                   
        "vesting_duration_seconds": 0                                                                                 
      }                                                                                                               
    ]                                                                                                                 
  }                                                                                                                   

the policy 0 is cliff vesting which allows to claim vested stake after the duration .. not sure what cliff_seconds is ..

8
General Discussion / Re: [Public Testnet] testnet.bitshares.eu
« on: August 31, 2018, 11:33:54 am »
voted

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: August 29, 2018, 02:32:11 pm »

10
Cool!

The only thing that made me wonder is "decentralized trading engine", but I guess that's just me doing terminology again :D

11
General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 20, 2018, 04:13:50 pm »
Can you trust a committee account? OMG NO.
Registering new users costs nothing. It's easy to create a new committee account, fill it with fake users, maybe add some "reliable" accounts and then 1 & 2 & 3
While I agree with multisig accounts not adding to security by default,
the committee-account (and witness-account) are different in that the blockchain adds accounts to those accounts
according to governance.
There is no simple way to 'create a new committee' account.

12
General Discussion / Re: Consider derailing feed price
« on: August 20, 2018, 11:19:36 am »
I really think Bitshares needs to find a way to collateralise with bitcoin instead of BTS. (don't worry BTS will still have value because its need to pay fees)
Erm, how does that solve the problem?

13
General Discussion / Re: Consider derailing feed price
« on: August 20, 2018, 08:09:49 am »
I disagree with OP. First, to me, the linked graph shows an exceptionally stable smartcoin that normally trades between 0.95 and 1.15. Also, I don't see evidence that this spread is the reason for the lack of mass adoption.

A certain spread is required by the system to incentivize market participants to push the price in the right direction.
I guess OP merely wants to "tighten the peg" which not necessarily *removes* the incentives.

Quote
Providing a deliberately skewed price feed is (once again, so who cares) a violation of the settlement guarantee.
My concern as well - can't change the price feed without breaking the promise for fair settlement.

14
General Discussion / Re: Consider derailing feed price
« on: August 18, 2018, 05:49:35 pm »
Another thought: settlements.
Assuming we have a 'CONSTANT' offset in the price feed that is equal to the MSSR, so that margin calls execute at the external price ... Then we need to offset settlements by -10% which is to my knowledge not possible.
To keep it fair we would need to have a way to offset settlement with negative percentages and ALSO need to allow feed producers to define that price (probably worth discussing publishing the offset thru feed producers anyways)

Thoughts??

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] btspp-witness(双语)
« on: August 18, 2018, 05:42:02 pm »
    Recently, I have been studying the BTS problem, constantly looking through the forum posts, constantly thinking, thinking more and more clearly, gradually found that the BTS problem is not very big, in fact, it is very simple, but we lost ourselves.

Feeding price should answer how much BTS price is more reasonable, feeding price should actually be determined according to the demand of bitcny. The demand of bitcny determines the price of BTS, not the price of BTS determines the demand of BITCNY. If this relationship is straightened out, then the problem can be solved simply by determining the feeding price according to the market demand for bitcny.


In fact, the future market for bitcny is very big demand, so we just need to constantly adjust the BTS feeding according to demand. How to judge the demand for bitcny, the market will give us the answer, the drum charge rate, the exchange of bitcny trading prices can be referred to.

The problem is that the demand for bitcny is not effectively transmitted to the feed price. Our feed price only collects the price of the exchange. It is not that the exchange controls the feed price, but that we do not determine the reasonable feed price according to the demand of bitcny in time.



We just have to hold on to the market demand for smart money and let the market decide the price of BTS. Using the invisible hand, the charge rate, to dynamically adjust the feeding to improve anchoring accuracy, let 1 bitcny = 1 cny, and BTS succeeds.

最近一直在研究BTS的问题,不断翻看论坛的帖子,不断思考,思路越来越清晰,渐渐的发现BTS的问题不是很大,其实也很简单,只是我们迷失了自己。

      喂价应该回答BTS的价格是多少比较合理,喂价的高低实际上应该根据bitcny的需求确定。bitcny的需求决定了BTS的价格,而不是BTS 的价格决定BITCNY的需求。理顺了这个关系,那么问题就好办了,只要根据市场上bitcny的需求来确定喂价就行了。


       事实上,未来的市场对bitcny的需求很很大的,因此我们只要根据需求不断的调整BTS的喂价就行了。怎么判断bitcny的需求呢,市场会给我们答案,鼓鼓的充值费率,交易所里bitcny的交易价格都可以参考。
 
       目前的问题就是bitcny的需求没有有效的传递到喂价,我们的喂价仅仅采集了交易所的价格而已,不是交易所控制了喂价,而是我们没有根据bitcny的需求及时确定合理的喂价。
       


         我们只要紧紧抓住市场对智能货币的需求就可以了,做到让市场来决定BTS的价格。用充值费率这只无形的手来动态调整喂价促进锚定精度更加准确,让1bitcny=1cny,那么BTS就成功了。
 
Good thoughts here!

How do we derive a metric for 'demand' and how would that influence the price feed? You have a formula in mind?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 841