Hey karnal. Welcome to bitsharestalk! Here are some answers to your questions.
1) I suppose the network could become forked in that manner, if the physical backbone between geographical regions was compromised.
2) You can register a new market pegged asset for Darkcoin by using the console command "wallet_asset_create". I believe market pegged assets costs 500k to register. The asset market won't be open (i.e. shorts can't execute to increase the supply) unless at least 51 delegates are publishing a feed for the asset.
>> h wallet_asset_create
Usage:
wallet_asset_create <symbol> <asset_name> <issuer_name> <description> <maximum_share_supply> <precision> [public_data] [is_market_issued] Creates a new user issued asset
Creates a new user issued asset
Parameters:
symbol (asset_symbol, required): the ticker symbol for the new asset
asset_name (string, required): the name of the asset
issuer_name (string, required): the name of the issuer of the asset
description (string, required): a description of the asset
maximum_share_supply (real_amount, required): the maximum number of shares of the asset
precision (uint64_t, required): defines where the decimal should be displayed, must be a power of 10
public_data (json_variant, optional, defaults to null): arbitrary data attached to the asset
is_market_issued (bool, optional, defaults to false): creation of a new BitAsset that is created by shorting
Returns:
transaction_record
3) You don't have to register an account name if you don't want, but once it is registered it can't be unregistered. You could create a new wallet and import the accounts you want to use into that new wallet atm. But I agree, it would be nice to be able to remove an account from the client if you registered it and want to retire it.
4) Good question. I'm not sure about new account creation requiring another backup. Probably?
5) I'm not concerned about those projects detracting from BitShares adoption because I think that DPOS is more efficient and nobody offers the same value proposition as BitShares does with the decentralized exchange & market pegged assets. You can read some comparisons between BitShares and NXT
here and some further discussion comparing the economics of NuBits to BitShares
here. The big difference between a NuBit and bitUSD is that the bitUSD has BTS collateral backing it.
As utility increases and the software matures, I think BitShares will gain some additional traction in the media. The NullStreet collective has been coordinating together to pursue educational, advertising, marketing materials and entrepreneurial / business development opportunities. There are a lot of irons in the fire atm. The brand message is becoming much more refined.
6) Not sure.
7) Yield is based on market fees that are collected into a reserve fund. When you transfer a BitAsset, the yield is credited.
When BitAssets are more ubiquitous and easy to use, I would definitely consider holding my some of savings as BitAssets in a cold wallet. A savings account is a great anology for holding bitUSD and likely one of the better angles to market it as.
9) You can short bitAssets to yourself, another bull position. The price of a bitAsset can fluctuate around the peg depending on supply or demand. So if everyone went super bull and wanted to sell all of their bitUSD, they may sell it for $.98 apiece or something. This would incentivize a buyer that wants to make a free 2%.
10) Market pegged assets, crowdhiring (i.e. funding projects / developers via delegates), 10 second block times, UIA configurations to support AML / KYC compliance for user issued assets enabling gateways, ability to send to registered names, .p2p decentralized DNS.