Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abit

Pages: 1 ... 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309
4606
如题,急问,我原来投了AGS,但还没有创建BTSX账户领取BTSX,D​NS及VOTES,请问11月快照会受影响吗?
原来主要是担心BTSX钱包不稳定会丢币,因此一直没有导入pts钱包。
另外11月5日后还可以导入pts钱包吗?

之前为什么不领。肯定不影响。但现在价格都不是最好的时候了。。。
看你的意思,领了就是为了砸盘吗?
长期投资的早领晚领没什么区别。如果是要用来投票就领出来。

4607
BM这个帖子
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10781.msg141941
大意是说,11月5号硬分叉,之后所有现有的受托人费率会自动降为3%,如果有人想使用更高费率,需要重新注册受托人,然后重新拉票。
分叉后开始采用新规则:所有手续费销毁,受托人拿固定工资,也就是(50*费率)。(这个50的基数不在上面那个帖子里)
受托人工资不会再像现在这样,因为交易量多少导致实际产生手续费多少而浮动了。

所以,如果你不想要高通胀,不要把票投给那些高费率的受托人就好了。另外我好像记得可以投反对票?那就更好。
其实这个事情,会让大家更重视自己手中的票和投票权。

另一个帖子,
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10747.0
也就是说把DAC重新定义为自治社区的,里面说了:3I手头的票,不再由BM一个人决定投给谁,而是会分给核心团队,由他们自行决定投给谁。

4608
General Discussion / Re: Cannot sync new client if less 2G Ram
« on: October 29, 2014, 03:42:18 pm »
I'm running the client in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (maybe debug mode?)
Every time re-indexing the block chain database, it eats more RAM, say about 3GB for 0.4.20, more than 3GB for 0.4.23.
So.. if you run the client with less than 3G RAM, it's better to start from an empty database, don't upgrade from a old chain database.

Another experience in a old version of client: when syncing from a chain server, the client eats more and more RAM as well. Restart works. Maybe there is a memory leak bug.

4609
有人砸正好多吃点

4610
我注册了好几个btsx的id。
但是没有下dns钱包,也就没注册新id。
估计不少人和我一样。
(本来bts钱包就不稳定,追着更新当小白鼠已经够累了,没精力玩那么多新玩意了)

ps.记得btsx用户id会自动导入dns吧?数量应该不止那么多吧

4611
我是AGSER+BTSXER,有少量PTS
我选5.
自从dns出来要重新买币就感觉不大对,资金被分散了;
bts钱包一直不稳定、却大推新产品,感觉研发团队的精力被分散了。
虽然没太搞明白整合后到底谁收益多,个人感觉整合起来比各自独立为战要好。
同意下面这个观点。
现阶段如果不停地上新的DAC,而BTSX基础系统还是样子货,则全线产品、整个项目将必死无疑。
如果不集中精力把BTSX做成功,把BTSX系统丢一边当样子货,则在此基础上的一切DAC,包括AGS,PTS都将成为垃圾,只能在一波又一波的炒作中被人丢弃。

4612
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 我刚才在市场上看了下发现个问题
« on: October 18, 2014, 01:13:48 pm »
从下往上看,
125usd 对应 5000btsx
567usd对应22686btsx
。。。
2000usd对应79622btsx

第一行好像是搞反了?

ps.我也好多天没开gui钱包了,一直用alt的脚本看盘的。

4613
中文 (Chinese) / Re: xp下无法用钱包的看过来
« on: October 18, 2014, 12:10:59 pm »
我本来在想谁TM挖坟。。
原来如此。
这个不是代码问题,是编译环境设置问题,可能不关toolkit的事。

4614
Good tool +5%, however it's too wide for my laptop  :-[
you can use a small font,  for ubuntu 1404, the hotkey is  ctrl  -/ctrl +
or change the source to fit your screen....
Thanks!
I'm tweaking the source.. the font size is already too small for me.
An advice: it's better to use '>' when formatting numbers.

4615
Good tool +5%, however it's too wide for my laptop  :-[

4616
General Discussion / Re: Block Explorer and Delegates Listing
« on: September 25, 2014, 02:25:21 am »
It seems like the site stopped syncing..
@svk?

4617
Transaction scanning is slow because of cryptography and because every update we rescan everything as we fix bugs. 

Once we get to version 1.0 you will only have to scan new transactions since your last sync.

The speed of rescanning is heavily dependent upon how many accounts you have.  It can take 10x longer if you have 10 accounts vs 1 account which can make a scanning process that takes me 6 minutes take someone else 1 hour.    If you are using 32 bit windows it will also take 2x as long.   

Transaction pruning won't help.

We are working on a light-weight solution, but that will depend upon blockchain servers and other infrastructure.

Looks like transaction scanning always freeze the client UI in windows.
Will it help if "Move some code into a separate thread"?

4618
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 17, 2014, 03:08:40 am »
My bot often stuck while fetching price feed from bter or btc38 (pool Internet connection :().

I think it's better to add a timeout parameter while fetching..

feeds/bter.py
Code: [Select]
bitstamp_data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(req, timeout=5))
...
btsx_data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(req, timeout=5))

feeds/btc38.py (several lines)
Code: [Select]
response = requests.get(url=url, headers=self.headers, params=params, timeout=5)

4619
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 16, 2014, 05:19:42 pm »
Anyone has any profit generated?
I saw no transaction done with the default config..

4620
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 15, 2014, 02:26:05 pm »
Should this line
response = self.request("wallet_market_order_list", [base, quote, -1, account])
change to
response = self.request("wallet_market_order_list", [base, quote, -1, account_name])
?
Check your bots!


Recent price changes have caused the 15RC1 release market_maker to cancel some orders. The btsx.py cancel_bids_less_than and cancel_bids_out_of_range references account instead of account_name which causes a crash. Have a look and make sure your bot is still running.


Fix is to change the def to account_name like the other functions.

Code: [Select]
    def cancel_bids_less_than(self, account_name, base, quote, price):
        response = self.request("wallet_market_order_list", [base, quote, -1, account])
        order_ids = []
        for pair in response.json()["result"]:
            order_id = pair[0]
            item = pair[1]
            if item["type"] == "bid_order":
                if float(item["market_index"]["order_price"]["ratio"])* (self.BTSX_PRECISION / self.USD_PRECISION) < price:
                    order_ids.append(order_id)
                    log("%s canceled an order: %s" % (account_name, str(item)))
        cancel_args = [[item] for item in order_ids]
        response = self.request("batch", ["wallet_market_cancel_order", cancel_args])
        return cancel_args

Pages: 1 ... 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309