Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cob

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 26
241
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 28, 2014, 09:18:56 pm »
Your PTS will give you shares in this DAC, or do you mean something else?
Yes but how do the shares make money? In other words how does the DAC make a profit to pass on to the shareholders.

just read the first post in this thread.

Quote
2.2.2 Artistcoins
An artist can decide to create his own coin and start selling them to his fans to fund his career. The artist sets the price of his coin and sells it just as he would sell a baseball card. A limited edition digital token with his name and/or his face on it. These newly created, limited edition artistcoins are now distributed throughout the artist’s fanbase and himself. The income generated by his fans buying up the artistcoins will go straight to his wallet, directly funding his career just like kickstarter would. Only, as we will see below, this type of kickstarter is superior in many ways.
Every time a song is sold on PeerTracks.com, a certain % of that income goes into the market and buys up the lowest ask of that artistcoin, effectively cashing out the seller. That artistcoin is “burned” (taken out of circulation). This mechanism achieves the following:
pays the artist for his content
increases liquidity in that artistcoin (paying off the artistcoin seller)
increases demand in that artistcoin
reduces supply of that limited edition artistcoin
The last three points are what can cause a price increase in that artistcoin.
The more music an artist sells on PeerTracks, the more liquid his artistcoin is. Since every song sale is actually a buy order on the books.
If a user purchased a certain artist’s coin and the artist starts selling songs and albums on PeerTracks, that coin is now worth more than when it was purchased. It is in that user’s self-interest to share and promote this artist’s music in order to reap maximum benefit from the holding of that artistcoin. In other words, the fans are incentivized to generate more music sales for the artists they hold artistcoins of.

That describes how the artistcoin will make money not the DAC.
So will PTS holders be given 10% of all artistcoins? Or will the DAC charge a fee for creating an artistcoin?
Like BitSharesX the revenue streams for the Dac :

1) Transaction fees
2) bid/ask overlap
3) Asset creation
4) Shorting related fees
5) Feel like I'm missing some...

Yes it is exactly like BitSharesX, only we are isolating a certain type of transaction and making that transaction fee higher.

We want everything to stay low cost of course, but the DAC must generate revenue on song sales.
This means that BitUSD transfers will be slightly more expensive.

So people trading around artistcoins (say 2 kids swaping coins in the school yard) should not be charged a big fee. This fee is cheap. But someone sending BitUSD from his wallet to an artist's wallet (upon song purchase) will see a higher transaction fee.
The goal is for the DAC to make money when music is sold basically.

242
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 28, 2014, 09:13:54 pm »
Awesome introduction. Really explains the key benefits in an easy to understand way.  +5%

The % for the coin buy back can be set by the artist? If so is it ensured that the rate can't be decreased after the coin was issued?

The DAC will most likely allow that rate to be decided by the issuer, but on PeerTracks, we are planning on having a set rate for better user experience. We don't want to overload the user with a million different moving parts to account for.

So the DAC will allow flexibility is amount of artistcoins issued, and the % of income going to artist and artistcoin holders.

On PeerTracks though, since it is kind of a stepping stone to introduce the masses to this entirely new concept, we want to make it a set # of artistcoins and a fixe % for the buy back mechanism.

This way when you look at the top 100 charts, even a 10 year old will be able to get it.

Imagine if someone issued 700 billion artistcoins and the buy back was 0.1% and some guy makes 4 artistcoins with a 50% buy back.
One will be in decimal world, the other in Zimbabwe land, one coin willl be worth 5 million BitUSD and the other 0.0007 pennies.

We want to avoid that AT LEAST at first, while we want to ensure a good user experience.
The DAC will allow anything though. Front end sites / apps can choose the model they want.

243
For those that have not visited the Music subforum, follow the yellow brick link:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9360.0

244
Yes!

This will bring great value to the BitShares Music blockchain. PeerTracks would fail miserably if it ended up looking like btc-e!

245
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: PTS snapshot date. Ensure you have Notes at launch
« on: September 27, 2014, 05:21:46 pm »
What will the distribution be? 10% AGS / 10% PTS still?

No, a few massive changes were made in the way future DACS might be launched. We will be testing out the new method. Details to come within the next 48hours.

246
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: PTS snapshot date. Ensure you have Notes at launch
« on: September 27, 2014, 05:18:59 pm »
Hi .. I just want to clarify one thing... you said "Make sure you have your PTS out of the exchanges and into your wallets", is this means no Music Notes will be honored to those addresses belong to exchanges?


To claim your NOTES you need to import the private key for the address that has the PTS at time of snap shot. If your money is on an exchange you do not have the private keys and therefore nothing to import.

Exactly.

247
Muse/SoundDAC / PTS snapshot date. Ensure you have Notes at launch
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:48:51 pm »
BitShares Music DAC

Make sure you have your PTS out of the exchanges and into your wallets by october 10th 2014 at midnight.
So the first second of October 10th 2014 is when the snapshot will be taken.

This is GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) time zone, or UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) we are talking about here.

Keep in mind the BitShares PTS confirmation time is pretty slow and random. So don't wait until the last second to act or your PTS might not have been included in a block in time for the snapshot.

As for the NOTE allocation at Genesis block:
35% PTS
35% AGS
20% upcoming pre-sale
10% BitShares Music Foundation

Keep in mind delegates will be able to dilute the Note supply if Note holders vote for it. The details are being workout out by bytemaster in this thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9452.0
They might not have to dilute and BitShares Music will most likely have a cap on the amount of dilution possible but just so you are aware ahead of time, this allocation is for genesis block.

Edit: to clarify. AGS is also getting a stake in the music DAC of course. Only no action is required by AGS holders since the AGS donation campaign ended already. They cannot be sold, nor purchased.

(This post is just for people that have not checked out the music forum. Please debate delegate pay / dilution in it's respective thread.)

248
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:32:51 pm »
3.2.3 is something I never thought about (perks for coin holders) and is absolutely brilliant! Imagine the spike in One Direction coin price when they announce that the top 50 coin holders get a backstage pass. O. M. G.

Yes! And the fun thing is that it's not a centrally planned feature. It's success does not depend on a couple dev brains. It's a tool that allows every band and artist and label, and promo team to think up how they can get value from that artistcoin... working for us, the Note holders!

249
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:30:09 pm »
Looks good cob!

Sorry, but I'm at it again with spotting typos. In part three it says, "Every time the song is or purchased".

Edit:

cob, I'd like to ask you something. There is an established band which I love. I think they may be interested in PeerTracks. When do you think would be a good time to try to get them interested? If they are interested will there be a special channel set up whereby PeerTracks work with artists to educate, assist and bring them onboard?

Thanks for the typo! edited from the actual paper. Thanks.

And for now, the peertracks newsletter is a way for us to keep track of who to contact when there is relevant news.
http://peertracks.com/#8

It's still a bit to early to really reach out to them. It will be clear when BitShares Music is ready.


250
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:26:47 pm »
Solid job Cob,

I really see the potential growth there.

The artistcoin buy back from song selling revenues is very nice, there's going to be a great appeal to create artistcoins for niche artists as well as established money making machines (the likes of U2, Rolling Stones, etc.).

How do you plan on making sure there won't be any "scammers" that will create an artistcoin without being the real artist and try to sell them to others that believe they buy the coins from the real band? I mean it might take a while before some artists get to hear about Bitshares music, and  nothing (that I know of) is preventing early scammers to upload existing music for which they don't have the rights and sell artistcoins as well.

There will be a few mechanisms is place.
Reputation for one.
The front end sites will have a report/flag button so that people finding out someone is selling someone elses music can report it. The Front end website could always refuse service to these people, they would have to do their scams from somewhere else.
Once you have a mechanism that detects a scammer, people will not want to invest in that user's fake artistcoin since that's very risky business. Especially if he keeps getting barred from the big sites. Imagine getting banned from ebay. Sure you can still sell on you own site/app, but soooo much less traffic will even see your product now. Ostracism is the name of the game.

PeerTracks also intends to have a "verified" artist green check feature.

Any other ideas are welcome!

251
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:21:19 pm »
This project has me so excited I can hardly sit still, it's absolutely revolutionary and the paper does a good job of exposing the potential, well done Cob! :)

One thing I'm still unsure about is how exactly being on a playlist will generate income for the artist, or rather why the artistcoin value will increase? Just from popularity and the fact that people will want to buy their songs or is there an actual mechanism in place?

Quote
You can see your artistcoins rise in value if the artist starts selling albums or gets their song played on one of the more popular playlists.

I'm no expert but I imagine that if an artist get's played regularly on the radio, he gets compensated according to how often his songs get played. Will you implement a similar concept for the playlists? If so, where will the money come from to pay for this compensation, ads?

The MVP will not incorporate streaming. It is one thing we want to do of course, but it would require WAY longer dev time and we want the proof of concept out as soon as possible.

But eventually, just the fact that you are in one of the playlist that was 2000 people currently listening (like you see on grooveshark) means a few people are clicking through to purchasing the song (other sites link to the itunes store).

So being included in a popular playlist means exposure + possible click through conversions to purchase song or album.

We have look a bit into having each play be a micro-transaction, but since we are not doing the streaming thing just yet, it's on the back-burner for now.

252
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 05:40:10 am »
That sounds pretty good! +5%

August 16th, 2014

Why didn't you start with that to begin with?

Now on the IPO,
 the '3.2.2 Crowd-funding' does not explain the proposed IPO model for the DAC itself - hope you have equally good news in that regard too!

The IPO model for the DAC itself will be announced very soon. I want to make sure all our ducks are in a row before saying anything.
Eddie and I had a long Skype call with Stan, Daniel and Nikolai and they introduced us to the "IPO" model they would have used in 2013 had they had the knowledge and experience they have now (and not to mention they would have needed DPOS to do it!) .

The new proposed method came out of left field but once I got my head around it, realized it solves so many problems. regulations for starters and all the attorney fees tied to that. It will be more democratic (Notes holders have a say in where the funds are going), no up front cost for "investors", meaning it will be pay as you go (if we produce results then the funding comes in).

Anyway I won't spend too much time talking about it yet. It'll be cleared up much better in an upcoming blog post / article. Which will be shared on the forums of course.

253
Muse/SoundDAC / BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: September 26, 2014, 04:31:01 am »
This should give everyone a better idea of what is being developed.

Bitshares Music
and
PeerTracks
Non-technical Paper
By Cédric Cobban
cedric@peertracks.com

August 16th, 2014

Abstract
Napster introduced people to peer to peer (P2P) file sharing. It sparked what changed the entertainment industry forever. Crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin have opened the door to an economic revolution in the information age as significant as the industrial revolution before it. BitShares Music is the first experiment in taking the ideas introduced by Bitcoin and Napster to the next level by issuing trust-free digital assets that have the potential to fluctuate in value with the sales of music, fund the artist and reward the buyer. In this paper we share the details of how BitShares Music can change the music world, affecting the majority of the online population rather than strictly the financial sector.

1.0 Background
BitShares Music does not seek to reinvent the wheel. It simply aims to take what is made possible with the advent of a blockchain (a decentralized public ledger) and apply this new technology to some already proven concepts.

1.1 Napster and P2P
Napster introduced many of us to the concept of P2P. It revolutionized the music industry, even its downfall led to the gradual decentralization of file sharing services like FastTrack, Donkey2000, and Bittorrent. File sharing is great for most, but it has left many content creators feeling short handed.

1.2 Pandora, 8tracks, Grooveshark, Last.fm and similar music APIs
Music APIs have proven that there is huge demand for music discovery playlists. Although most people's music libraries are enormous compared to just a few decades ago, choosing what to listen to can be quite a task and the shuffle option can sometimes be the worst DJ imaginable. More importantly, big personal playlists do not quench our thirst for something new to listen to.

1.3. iTunes and paying for music
The iTunes store has shown that people are willing to pay for music if it can be made convenient enough. People want a fast, easy and virus/trojan/malware free way to get ahold of an audio file. If these criteria are met and the price is low enough, many will find it worth while to hand over a small sum for the desired songs. Although those that lack the funds will, for self-interested reasons, have no choice but to take the time and go through the hassle of pirating a song.

1.4 Crowdfunding with Kickstarter
Crowdfunding websites have demonstrated the willingness of the people to support an idea or a cause without getting much (if anything) in return, as long as they know the funds are going to the desired cause.

1.5 Bitcoin, the DAC concept and publicity
Bitcoin is what some consider the first Decentralized Autonomous Company (DAC). Where the Bitcoin protocol is the company, each bitcoin is a share of that company and each bitcoin owner is a shareholder. Bitcoin has no marketing branch and yet Bitcoin got worldwide recognition in 2013. How is that? Well, every single "shareholder" was effectively a PR representative for Bitcoin. Every bitcoin owner had an economic incentive for it to catch on and be globally accepted. And it worked. Bitcoin is a great example of a DAC's grassroot publicity strategy.

1.6. Initial Public Offerings
Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) aren't new. They are a great way for a company to raise capital while getting exposure at the same time. Unfortunately, IPOs are a complicated and costly process only well established businesses can afford. There is a need for a simpler process which would be easily available to regular people which isn’t currently addressed.


2.1.0 Introduction to BitShares Music
BitShares Music, a slight variant of BitSharesX, is an experiment to test the economic theory behind a new kind of music market. It creates a decentralized exchange that uses a decentralized transaction ledger secured by DPOS (Delegated Proof Of Stake) to create fungible digital tokens that are tied to an artist’s profile. Like all DACs, BitShares Music has units that can be transferred between users in the same way bitcoins can. For the purpose of this paper, units in BitShares Music will be referred to as Notes and we will be using artistcoin, a token of a specific artist, as the example asset.     

A musician using BitShares Music can create, say, 10000 artistcoins into existence. He can sell or give away the newly created artistcoins to his fans to fund his or her career. Every single artistcoin is recorded and kept track of in the ledger that is the BitShares Music blockchain.

2.2.0 PeerTracks
The first front end to use the BitShares Music technology will be the PeerTracks website. Allowing for a user friendly way for artists to harness the true power of their fans through incentivized, peer 2 peer, talent discovery. Hence, BitShares Music and PeerTracks are two separate, independent entities. PeerTracks uses the BitShares Music blockchain and adds value to the network just as Bitpay uses the Bitcoin blockchain and adds value to that. One does not own the other. If PeerTracks were to disappear, or get shut down, this would not affect the BitShares Music blockchain anymore than Bitcoin would be affected if Bitpay was shut down. It would go on as long as transactions are processed. Other front ends could pop up, whether it be websites, apps, desktop clients, etc. PeerTracks does not have a monopoly on who gets to be the front end for the blockchain. There could be dozens or hundreds of websites all bringing in value and volume to BitShares Music.

2.2.1 Music Retail website
PeerTracks will allow an artist to create a profile and upload his music song by song, album by album and set the price for each piece of audio. The flow of music goes directly from artist to fan and the flow of income goes directly from fan to artist. PeerTracks does not hold any funds.

2.2.2 Artistcoins
An artist can decide to create his own coin and start selling them to his fans to fund his career. The artist sets the price of his coin and sells it just as he would sell a baseball card. A limited edition digital token with his name and/or his face on it. These newly created, limited edition artistcoins are now distributed throughout the artist’s fanbase and himself. The income generated by his fans buying up the artistcoins will go straight to his wallet, directly funding his career just like kickstarter would. Only, as we will see below, this type of kickstarter is superior in many ways.
Every time a song is sold on PeerTracks.com, a certain % of that income goes into the market and buys up the lowest ask of that artistcoin, effectively cashing out the seller. That artistcoin is “burned” (taken out of circulation). This mechanism achieves the following:
pays the artist for his content
increases liquidity in that artistcoin (paying off the artistcoin seller)
increases demand in that artistcoin
reduces supply of that limited edition artistcoin
The last three points are what can cause a price increase in that artistcoin.
The more music an artist sells on PeerTracks, the more liquid his artistcoin is. Since every song sale is actually a buy order on the books.
If a user purchased a certain artist’s coin and the artist starts selling songs and albums on PeerTracks, that coin is now worth more than when it was purchased. It is in that user’s self-interest to share and promote this artist’s music in order to reap maximum benefit from the holding of that artistcoin. In other words, the fans are incentivized to generate more music sales for the artists they hold artistcoins of.


3.0 Incentives and advantages
The current economic model for buying music gives the listener two choices: one free, and one paying. People getting their music for free are the majority. People that pay for music do so for a variety of reasons but none of them involve self-interest. Our new model favours everyone's self-interests. Unlike the current one where artists hesitate before putting their music online for fear of file sharing / pirating, PeerTracks now makes it profitable for the artist to upload and share everything he has.

What Bitshares Music offers is to take the majority of people that normally just torrent music and turn them into music buyers. How so? By switching the incentives around. Buying music through the blockchain is now an action that promotes self-interest. If a user likes a song so much that he is willing to download it with the varying levels of hassle it entails (trojans / malware / viruses and the time required to find the files online), he most likely sees the value of that song. By buying an artistcoin of that artist, he is invested in the artist’s success. Every time the song is or purchased, the new artistcoin holder now sees the value of his portfolio rise and can cash out at any time.

A buyer can purchase an artistcoin, compensating the band in the process, for the sole reason that he will make money off it in the future. BitShares Music is harnessing the power of greed and putting it at the service of good.

As for people already paying for their music, they will keep doing so, but will now know that the funds are going directly to that artist and, to a smaller degree, those that helped that artist out (by sending them money for artistcoins).

3.1.0 The user
Apart from the obvious benefits of having a website generate quality playlists, the user's role is to make sure new talent gets recognized and rises to the top.
Buying an artistcoin is not a private donation done behind closed doors. The user contributes financially to the artist’s career and this is reflected publicly in the price of the specific artistcoin. Other users / listeners notice rising coin value, get curious and look into it by either listening or buying artistcoins themselves.
This is not pure charity either. You can see your artistcoins rise in value if the artist starts selling albums or gets their song played on one of the more popular playlists.

3.1.1 Freed market in music genres
Money can now go straight from the fan to the artist and the music from the artist directly to the fan, eliminating the need for a middleman. Talent is also discovered and shared peer-2-peer. This removes some of the influence big record labels have on picking who rises to the top. Those corporations often change a band to what they think will please the public. Trying to please the most amount of people at once, creating a bland, one size fits all type of music. Well this is the internet and BitShares Music now allows for the fans to decide what they like and want to hear before any corporate meddling. The artist can be as specific and niche orientated as the internet allows him to be. How many more genres would we have without the bottlenecking effect of the current system? How many artists gave up from lack of financial support because they thought what they did would never catch on and instead found another line of work? Had they had just a bit of financial support they would have refined their musical skills just little longer before giving it up.
Some bands also never get signed because they are offered horrible deals by the big record label companies. BitShares Music bypasses this inefficient way of getting talent to rise to the top.

3.1.2 Borderless careers
A user could spend hours looking for something new/good/genuine to listen to. This could now be a productive activity. The user could now make revenue from finding new talent and buying into their career before the masses do. Anyone with an internet connection, no matter what his country's economic situation, could generate income by finding talent early and in the process, helping it rise to the top.

3.2.0 The artist
The artist can be himself, no need to sell out to what a record label thinks would please the masses. He can now generate revenue immediately without signing with any company. All he would be doing is putting his music out there, and letting the internet see if they like it.

3.2.1 Global grassroots marketing
The band gets to have people doing the marketing for them, because of these new economic incentives. It no longer has to rely on friends and family to spread the word, and it can now have a varied fan base spread out across the world that thinks their music has potential. Those diverse fans have an economic incentive to share the band's music out to the world. When they do, the band gets more and more funds to pursue their career.
This is a win/win/win situation where the artist, wins, the fans win and the world wins by hearing new music that might have never broke out of the band's hometown or closed circle of Facebook friends.

3.2.2 Crowd-funding
PeerTracks replaces existing models of crowd-funding via sales of artistcoins. Only in this situation the contributors are not doing it as a donation but because they can profit from that purchase. The people who currently contribute to crowd-funding projects (like kickstarter and indigogo) will continue to do so, what this new system adds on top of that capital, are the funds of all the new contributors doing so for reasons of personal gain.
PeerTracks offers to outperform the existing crowd-funding competition and do it while cutting out the middlemen:   
The fees taken by the services themselves (5% for Kickstarter)   
Payment processing fees (3% to 5% + $0.20 per pledge for Kickstarter)

3.2.3 Token Controlled Access
Bands can even offer special treats to their artistcoin holders. For example a band could announce that anyone with over 100 of their coins can just show up at any of their concerts, as long as they have their balance on their smartphone for the bouncer to see before letting them in. Another example could be to grant the 10 largest coin holders access backstage to meet / hang out with the band or something as simple as "Artistcoin holders get a free t-shirt and a picture with the band". This process can be automated too. A user logging into his PeerTracks account might see different files available for download and at different prices on music, concert tickets and merchandise depending on how many of that artist’s coin he holds. Some artists might allow large coin holders to download anything they have for free, maybe even allow private messaging. Whatever the band decides really. It's a way to:
Show appreciation for the support
Make the value of the band's coin appreciate.
An artistcoin that goes up in value is great, but one that also comes with all kinds of perks can be worth way more to diehard fans. All at negligible cost to the band itself.


4.0 Room for growth
We are not talking about just propping up another music API website to simply compete with the current ones. We are proposing a system to revolutionize the way media is shared by the artist and the fans, which now has stake in the content as well. This has the potential to reshape industries and create thousands of DOGEcoin like ecosystems in the process. All residing on the BitShares Music blockchain.

4.1 Undercutting the competition
The PeerTracks website uses the BitShares Music blockchain as back-end. Using this new technology allows us to undercut the current music API models that must deal with credit card fees and any other overhead. Using PeerTracks, the income generated goes directly to the artist/label.
With the reduction of fees and middlemen, there is more wiggle room for prices to come down. Compared to other music retail options, the artist/label can either:
Sell at the same price as before but now actually receive all the income
Lower his price and still make the same amount per song. Although keep in mind lower prices can mean more sales. So in this scenario the artist ends up with more total income.
A combination of both. So he could still be cheaper on PeerTracks than most other sites and yet still make more per song.
That being said, PeerTracks will not be limited to new musicians that have not yet signed a record deal. It can also incorporate all existing music as well. The model still allows artists that are already signed under a record label to upload their music. A record company could create a profile with the name of one of their bands, upload all their songs and distribute the coins to the fans the way they see fit. The income generated by these coin sales would be split between the record label and the artist whichever way their original legal contract stipulates.

4.2 BitShares Media
Once the model proves successful, nothing would stop us from applying the concept to video, thus competing with YouTube, Vimeo, etc.

4.3 Grassroots marketing for crypto in general
Every band, every singer in every town (and every newsfeed!) from Vancouver to Buenos Aires to Moscow will be telling their fans to support them by jumping on PeerTracks or the BitShares Music blockchain directly. Thus introducing the masses to the world of crypto assets. This is grassroots advertising that can benefit BitShares, Bitcoin and all the others.


5.0 Revolutions
What popularized Peer-2-Peer networks was the arrival of Napster. Before Napster, only a select few knew what P2P stood for. Napster took the technology and applied it to a sector of the economy nearly everyone was involved in, music. Without even knowing what it was or how it worked, millions of people started using P2P technology. This is what educated the public and got them comfortable with the P2P concept. We believe BitShares Music and the PeerTracks is what can change the zeitgeist regarding crypto-currency, equity, accessible crowdfunding, etc.
PeerTracks is what will take Bitcoin, BitShares and the like, out of the specialized niche area of investors, economists, gold bugs, libertarians and cipher-punks and into the mainstream and everyday use. We aim to do for the crypto world what Napster did for the P2P world, bringing it to billions.




254
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: About Shares
« on: September 24, 2014, 04:07:46 am »
So, music is pretty much free. In general, people aren't going to go out of their way to pay for music when it's pretty simple to youtube anything you want to listen too. Musicians can still make some money though performances, licensing, merch, etc..
Bitshares music/peertracks vision is to bring artist and fans closer together to cut out middle men and I think that's a great idea. So here are some rough ideas that i want to share with the community that I think would be neat.

1.  I suggest rather than focusing on selling music, artist only sell shares (artist coins) and they provide tools for the fans who buy their shares to become promoters and agents. For example, I'm scrolling through the site listening to tracks, I find something I like, I say "hey that's pretty good" and then I click an up arrow to buy 1000 of their artist coins because I think they might catch on.

2. Artist shares need to have some promise of value so artist should reward their fans who help promote them in some way. Ideally they could pay out dividends. I'm not sure about the legality of all this but one way to get around this might be to consider the fans that you're paying dividends to as a co-artist or something along those lines.

So for example,  a  fan/shareholder can book a show for an artist to help put together an upcoming tour and if the artist accepts the gig the fan can be rewarded(maybe in artist coins) and the artist can pay out dividends to all the fans once they have been paid. The important part would be making this process easy for your fans so they can do this without a back in forth email conversation.  They simply submit a form with the details and wait for the artist to confirm.

Anyway, thanks for letting me share some musings with you all.

Edit: Title didn't match
Hey sittingbull.
Well, to address your first point. On PeerTracks at least, the artist can set his own price for his music. So it opens up the possibility to what you are saying. The artist can also set the price for his artistcoin, he can simply give them away to his fans or whoever if he pleases.
This should be very interesting to watch. What strategy will work best? How creative can each artist/band + marketting department get with this? I expect we will be in for a surprise.
And here we are still just at the MVP (basic basic basic, create profile, upload music, sell it, sell user issued assets that are tied to your music sales).

This brings us to your second point.
We are not trying to build a gimmick. Or a kinda cool site for music. We want to create jobs (:
Think of ebay. People don't go to ebay because it's "kinda cool" they go there because it's their job. It's how they make a living. At one point I believe ebay was the biggest "employer" in north america.

We are creating a few separate jobs. There are the obvious ones, like the band itself, it sells its music right off of the platform and bags the money.
There are the talent discoverers that are experts in their own domain, say death metal, and will spot potential stars early, buy that band's coin and make a killing if they go big.

But i also want to add the DJ or "playlist creator/curator" in there as soon as we have a music streamng site. There is huge demand for well labeled quality playlists for just the right occassion.
Well we now have a way to incentivizes people to do just this

Few more features that could change the game for podcasters and audiobook authors also.

And to stay in line with your thinking, we also want to add tools that allow artists to "hire" their fans for work and pay them right there on the blockchain. These could be some kind of promoters.

But first the MVP!

255
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Ask me anything: BitShares Music and PeerTracks.
« on: September 21, 2014, 04:53:47 am »
Tonyk and Stan are correct.

Restructuring...

expect an announcement before the end of the week.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 26