Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bobmaloney

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 24
106
General Discussion / Re: SETL now a BTS competitor
« on: July 28, 2015, 07:03:18 pm »
The article doesn't mention any technological partnerships.

Quote
Culligan explained that SETL has been designed from the ground up to meet the needs of the financial sector. Perhaps most importantly, SETL is more in tune with the regulatory landscape than existing blockchains.

Who is or will be building a 100,000 TPS distributed blockchain exchange and ledger for them?

107
I thought your original (but redacted) post outlining some of your monetization plans were brilliant.

That being said, I think one bitshares 2.0-esque referral type system that may work somewhat would be charging for a "Premium" account which allows the user to submit playlists and/or entire custom channels (let them be their own DJ with access to the peertracks catalogue).

Allow the user to make $$$ (or at least -$$$ off their monthly "Premium") based off how many people and how popular their playlists are.

Just to add some additional support to my earlier suggestion:

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/09/apple-music-interview-jimmy-iovine-eddy-cue
http://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2015/07/06/humans-not-algorithms-apple-music-revolution-and-growing-influence-curator
http://www.mondaynote.com/2015/07/05/human-curation-is-back/

Apple is going big on human curation for good reason. I think it would benefit Peertracks to make it a highlighted feature with the possibility to earn income from it.
This can not only allow for competition to create better playlists and channels, but could also be a way to bring about new era of popular DJ's or even new talk radio type personalities like Howard Stern.

108
Please consider the possibility of rebranding the MUSIC/MUSE blockchain as more of an comprehensive entertainment blockchain.

Leave the door wide open for further developments and projects to make use of the chain for entertainment based property/assets/etc.

(such as authors/ebooks/audiobooks, podcasts, videocasts, educational material, etc.)

@cob  -   As I have posted earlier, I believe the software you guys have built for peertracks may be perfectly adopted (with minimal changes) for something like a *peerbooks* platform as well.

109
General Discussion / Re: Brownie Distribution Update
« on: July 23, 2015, 10:24:28 pm »
Would it not help to have an open google sheet and have everyone fill their details directly on there.
This may save you work.

 +5%

|                    bobmaloney                     |                       bobmaloney                     |                   bobmaloney                 |

110
General Discussion / Re: nasdaq to use bitcoin technology
« on: July 23, 2015, 09:16:13 pm »
I love how Nasdaq continues to get publicity from this regurgitated topic week after week  -  They've been riding this one since early May.

Hats off to them.

111
 +5%  Great job all!

112
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Micro update
« on: July 22, 2015, 11:55:04 pm »
  +5%  Thanks for the update cob!



Do the changes from 1.0 to 2.0 have any effect on the use or reliance of the previously planned stack of technologies, such as Hyperledger?

113
It may just be timing out.

Drop down user name at top right of client (if you have many user names, you will need to scroll down to get to "Advanced")

Advanced > Preferences > Logout timeout

Change "Logout timeout" from 1776 to >9000!!!!


*this single change has allowed me to run the 0.9.1 Bitshares client (fairly certain it was 0.9.1 - I haven't fired up this laptop since April or May) with the following Frankenstein setup (although, not recommended for those with a productive schedule):

Dell Latitude D830
Windows 8.1 Pro - 32-bit
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2.00GHz
2GB RAM
Seagate Momentus HDD @ 5400RPM - 120 GB - SATA 1.5Gb/s


114
 +5%   ;D

115
this kind of thread makes me wonder what those guys have been doing for the past couple of months? Are you serious talking about basic stuff NOW? Asking the community who has been waiting for almost one year to see first releases?

Very disappointing.

In all seriousness - this is most likely because you missed cobs redacted thread from a few weeks ago (which seemed well thought out and near finalization, IMO)

I suspect the large majority of their foundation is already in place.

I don't see anything wrong in a continued attempt at brainstorming - I'd be more disappointed without it.

116
I thought your original (but redacted) post outlining some of your monetization plans were brilliant.

That being said, I think one bitshares 2.0-esque referral type system that may work somewhat would be charging for a "Premium" account which allows the user to submit playlists and/or entire custom channels (let them be their own DJ with access to the peertracks catalogue).

Allow the user to make $$$ (or at least -$$$ off their monthly "Premium") based off how many people and how popular their playlists are.



*Edit: Channels

117
“The reason I’m not doing it," Wallach says, "is because I don’t want to spend a decade on it.”

We are 18 months in and very close!

 +5%

119
Technical Support / Re: Questions from a beginner
« on: July 09, 2015, 02:32:24 am »

120
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 04, 2015, 05:42:52 pm »
Good to see Fuzzy mentioned.

Let's not forget Thom:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17183.0.html

Both do great things regarding the constructive questioning and criticism to help protect the ethics and goals of Bitshares, while remaining positive and pro-Bitshares.

Cryptonomix would probably be well served to add them as liaisons to the rest of the community.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 24