211
General Discussion / Re: Liquid AGS shares (LAGS fund)
« on: May 21, 2014, 01:55:31 am »
Maybe Adam was referring to the completion of AGS funding. But definitely AGS was long been released.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
212
General Discussion / Re: BTS XT GUI: can we just adapt the NXT AE web GUI to interact with bts json-RPC?
« on: May 19, 2014, 02:46:32 am »
I think there is already a template for the GUI wallet and Invictus has the right guy for it.
213
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 19, 2014, 02:39:08 am »I'm not saying Invictus is doomed to fail, hell I've bought AGS every day this week including today.
I want this quote to be moved on topic "marketing"...
This is a very bullish signal for PTS
Please do not use this for marketing. Have you not got that I feel trapped and that I'm just acting in my best interest given the situation as I see it? If Invictus fails to deliver we're screwed anyways so its not like this is an act of support, the incentives they created make it better for me to give them back their PTS for a bigger share of AGS that will be valuable if they succeed.
The only thing that's bullish for PTS is Invictus is releasing the products that were promised and are overdue.
We are all more or less, stuck on a boat. All of us followers of this particular decentralization idea, have our investments stuck, in what seems forever, and our returns depending on the actions of a single person.
This post is not for those of you that think: “That is GREAT”. This is for those who think ‘what can one do about it’. Posting here is a decent option, it may help. For the rest of us, there is a serious possibility that ‘Liquid AGS’ might be coming on the NXT platform. I do not expect such asset, to make liquid all of our (prior) AGS donations, but it might be a good way to invest in AGS in the future. Just keep an eye for it.
Indeed as investors we are stuck on this situation that only Invictus has control of . But please refer to the work that BM's progress has been doing . It made significant phasing from testing and debugging to the forking of blockchains. Meaning Dan and the rest of Invictus have properly consider all possible ways in preventing flawed products. I'm truly amazed of what the team has done so far. Bitshare X is the key for all DACs to be monetized. Once the blockchain is ready, we can sail along and rock the boat to our success.
214
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares slogans
« on: May 19, 2014, 02:26:14 am »
"Revolutionizing the industries with blockchain technologies" is kinda appropriate for Bitshares. 
215
General Discussion / Re: Idea to promote better the bitshares-AGS fundraising oportunity !!!
« on: May 15, 2014, 10:50:11 pm »
Nice idea to promote funding AGS
216
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 15, 2014, 10:39:21 pm »Spawning thousands of DAC ideas. Even if someone only invested 100 AGS or PTS, to me it will be a virtual ATM
yes only if there is a net capital inflow into the bitshares ecosystem. or else, we dont gain any value swapping stakes in thousands of DACs among each other
Of course there will be much inflows. Imagine the transactions from Bitshares X, DNS (a core service for Internet) and Bitshares lotto are generated daily. Im optimistic with the technology. That is the reason why Invictus team are so meticulous in designing the blockchain.
Technology isn't enough. We need marketing. We need to airdrop onto MIT like others are doing. If the targeted airdrops happen then I could see it catching on fast.
College students are actually a really good demographic. MIT and Virginia Tech are great because not only does it have the right kind of thinkers but it's likely they'll actually have some money to buy these shares as well as the motivation.
Why only MIT ? Anyway marketing is like a thousand ways to implement . Brian Page and his team are making that 1k ways such considerations (airdrop, radio interviews, future DACs etc) I think once Keyhotee has been deployed it would reach million of users world-wide. Marketing then would become viral. Each Invictus/DAC product that will be launched, will have a mass exposure. Fast, economical and very much convenient .
217
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 15, 2014, 10:17:57 pm »
Deferred, not canceled, until we have several DACs in the top ten at coinmarketcap.com.
Ouch, year 2028?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now there's a good prediction market proposition:What year will BitShares first occupy three of the top-ten positions on coinmarketcap.com?
Probably late of 2014 . That is when bitcoin would peg around $800 - $1200 once again .
218
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: May 15, 2014, 12:24:54 pm »
IMO, a product with flaws must be corrected before launch. It will define the utmost stability and integrity of a product or service. Bytemaster is doing a great job so as the rest of the team. Focusing on one product though is a top priority to launch and it is a must. Building the confidence of investors would in effect be a momentum boost for PTS and AGS.
219
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 15, 2014, 12:08:20 pm »Spawning thousands of DAC ideas. Even if someone only invested 100 AGS or PTS, to me it will be a virtual ATM
yes only if there is a net capital inflow into the bitshares ecosystem. or else, we dont gain any value swapping stakes in thousands of DACs among each other
Of course there will be much inflows. Imagine the transactions from Bitshares X, DNS (a core service for Internet) and Bitshares lotto are generated daily. Im optimistic with the technology. That is the reason why Invictus team are so meticulous in designing the blockchain.
220
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 15, 2014, 07:30:18 am »
Spawning thousands of DAC ideas. Even if someone only invested 100 AGS or PTS, to me it will be a virtual ATM
221
General Discussion / Re: DPOS chain based ratings and reputation
« on: May 15, 2014, 06:00:22 am »
AirBnB is a forefront p2p home rental company that has too many regulatory challenges from the government. Making a DAC from a similar model might also end up risk of having to explain to the regulators how the business would operate in a legal manner.
222
General Discussion / Re: Mid May.Future?
« on: May 14, 2014, 04:16:29 am »
As Adam Levine might put it ... don't put all the eggs in one basket.
223
General Discussion / Re: Testing BitShares XT Launch...
« on: May 13, 2014, 09:25:26 pm »
I hope the wallet will be ready for download soon
224
General Discussion / Re: Interview with Toast
« on: May 13, 2014, 12:08:35 pm »
However, ME has not been snapshot yet.
225
General Discussion / Re: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS) White Paper
« on: May 13, 2014, 02:52:53 am »If you increase the min fee to $0.01 then the network would earn $5 per min and a delegate would earn 0.005 per min. 0.30 per hour for a total $600 per year.
We can therefore calculate the delegate pay based upon the average dollar value of the trx fee.
The challenge is pegging the fee to a dollar amount in some reasonable way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
what is the operating time for a day? 24 hours?
Base on this
0.005/min 0.30/hour ??/day 600/year <--- how did this calculated ?
I did that wrong $2628 per year is the proper number.
I calculated it as if it were a salary for 2000 hours per year.
so it is 24 hour operation. Thank you for clarifying this.
