Its like you're just ignoring the reason why I made this proposal to begin with. At the time, the core team had left the project, and there was doubt about what would happen in an emergency situation with no core team available to fix the problem. It was also intended to fix smaller bugs as well, but this was my chief concern. In the case of such an emergency, there could easily be no way for stakeholders to vote funds to fix the problem (e.g. the chain could be down). This proposal provided an insurance against such problems.

But, realistically speaking, if the current voters really don't want such insurance any more, I'm ok to return the funds. If you feel strongly on this issue, create an "opinion proposal" on whether the funds should be returned to the reserve pool. If it gets funded, I'm fine to return the funds and end this insurance policy.

You should return the funds instead of keeping it for yourself

Quote from: ljk424 on November 12, 2019, 03:05:01 am

警告！一个存有1.6亿BTS的冷钱包的私钥，可能已经丢失。这个账号是bitkkchubei002，ZB交易所的冷钱包。https://bts.ai/details/account/bitkkchubei002

Warning! The private key of a cold wallet with 160 million BTS may have been lost. This account is bitkchubei002, the cold wallet of ZB exchange. https://bts.ai/details/account/bitkkchubei002

它已经有超过18个月没有活动，我们高度怀疑它的私钥已经被丢失，或者发生了其他情况。这对于ZB.com的用户来说，是非常危险的，对Bitshares也是十分危险。我们猜测，这也是zb交易所长期以来一直做空BTS的原因。

It has not been active for more than 18 months, and we highly suspect that its private key has been lost, or something else has happened. This is very dangerous for users of zb.com and bitshares. We guess that's why ZB has been short of BTS for a long time.

First step: Whoever contacted ZB to vote for refund400k should establish contact again and talk to them, see what they can find out. BBF has reached out on several official ways, no response.

zb.com已经严重影响到Bitshares系统的安全和稳定了

Zb.com has seriously affected the security and stability of bitshares system

警告！一个存有1.6亿BTS的冷钱包的私钥，可能已经丢失。这个账号是bitkkchubei002，ZB交易所的冷钱包。https://bts.ai/details/account/bitkkchubei002

Warning! The private key of a cold wallet with 160 million BTS may have been lost. This account is bitkchubei002, the cold wallet of ZB exchange. https://bts.ai/details/account/bitkkchubei002

它已经有超过18个月没有活动，我们高度怀疑它的私钥已经被丢失，或者发生了其他情况。这对于ZB.com的用户来说，是非常危险的，对Bitshares也是十分危险。我们猜测，这也是zb交易所长期以来一直做空BTS的原因。

It has not been active for more than 18 months, and we highly suspect that its private key has been lost, or something else has happened. This is very dangerous for users of zb.com and bitshares. We guess that's why ZB has been short of BTS for a long time.

Quote from: pc on October 27, 2019, 02:00:29 pm

Quote from: tonyniu352 on October 27, 2019, 09:58:37 am

Observation1: The administrative authority is fully decentralized and in the hands of the users (BTS token holders) by voting method, the voting is to reflect the will of the majority and make decisions according to the majority.

That's the way it *should* be. However, the truth is that a single person is refusing others the right to propose changes and have the community vote for it. https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/pull/249

tl;dr: Some members of the Core Team have (on their own time) discussed the recently observed governance problems, and have come up with a proposal that tries to rectify the situation. After some discussion and various amendments, the proposal was merged last friday. Shortly thereafter, the proposal was reverted single-handedly by an individual. Furthermore, said individual has removed write access to the BSIPs repository for most members of the Core Team.

It is noteworthy that the management of the BSIP process is explicitly listed as a task in the Core Worker Proposal, which was voted on and accepted by the community.

It is also noteworthy that the same individual who is now complaining about said BSIP pushed through a different proposal without any discussion just a couple of weeks ago.

Decentralization my ass.

Quote from: tonyniu352 on October 27, 2019, 09:58:37 am

Observation2: Any attempts to modify the BTS voting mechanism e.g. removing debt voting are illegal, and shall be stop.

This is not an observation, it's an opinion. Others may disagree.

I have checked bsip83. Does anyone really think it will be approved? transfering bts voting right to another token? it is ass idea. Frankly, BTS has been runned for five or six years, and some people are trying to change voting rights now,just because BTS holders are complaining more and more about expenses of workers?  i worry about the professional spirit of these guys.

I think you are right. Some people want to deprive bts holders of their voting rights.It’s really shameful.

上！

中文社区的讨论可以在这里查看：
https://dpos.club/c/bts/bts-proposal

这个论坛比现在的bitsharestalk.org要流畅好多

why？

顶巨蟹，一个称职的理事，一个真正为BTS和社区发展孜孜不倦的人，很多所谓理事在其位不谋其政，不顾BTS和社区死活，一味因循守旧不思进取，面对巨蟹应该汗颜