Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - haruka

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:33:53 pm »
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:28:20 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:19:33 pm
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:16:17 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:12:16 pm
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:10:44 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:08:18 pm
*SNIP

abit also not explained why he ban me

So you think banning me is okay then?

Now everyone knows who's to blame.

I just deleted one of your messages after someone forwarded my message to the chat,
 
why do you think it's my bot? say thanks to abit he started all this bot shit.
do you not see I'm also muted by him?

Is that a valid reason to delete my message? In what way my message is harming you?

Why do I think it's your bot? Because you deleted one of my messages, then mysteriously I'm not able to send any messages anymore.

That must be some coincidences, right?

dude check one more time admin rights in the chat, I have no right to add the bot so it's definitely not mine

I deleted only one message where you ping fav, because was no reason, I stopped sending messages after it was forwarded.

why you demand something from me than from abit he for sure owns one of this bot and muted all independent admins that against his agenda?
Are you used to his abuse?

Did you ever see me anywhere in this drama apart from some (rare) normal group administration works?

I've already decided to refrain from participating in it, until I can't even do normal operations in the group.

I'll directly ask the bot owner for that "coincidence".

2
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:19:33 pm »
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:16:17 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:12:16 pm
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:10:44 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:08:18 pm
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:07:08 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:00:59 pm
*SNIP*

abit did for months adding other admins and you were silent as I recall

Now explain that I was able to speak in the groups, until JUST NOW.

Explain the above admin operation history.

abit also not explained why he ban me

So you think banning me is okay then?

Now everyone knows who's to blame.

I just deleted one of your messages after someone forwarded my message to the chat,
 
why do you think it's my bot? say thanks to abit he started all this bot shit.
do you not see I'm also muted by him?

Is that a valid reason to delete my message? In what way my message is harming you?

Why do I think it's your bot? Because you deleted one of my messages, then mysteriously I'm not able to send any messages anymore.

That must be some coincidences, right?

3
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:12:16 pm »
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:10:44 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:08:18 pm
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:07:08 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:00:59 pm




And now somebody have a bot to censor specific people.

But really? Adding me to your list?

Are you still sane?

abit did for months adding other admins and you were silent as I recall

Now explain that I was able to speak in the groups, until JUST NOW.

Explain the above admin operation history.

abit also not explained why he ban me

So you think banning me is okay then?

Now everyone knows who's to blame.

4
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:11:37 pm »
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:09:29 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:07:36 pm
Disclaimer:

I did nothing in this drama.

I was not on any side.

I just want to make sure telegram groups are not being abused by spammers. (that's you, @blockchained. evidence below)

Then I got censored by a bot and I'm not able to say absolute anything.

Is this what you want?



so you see that abit bot buned me, just because he thinks it's ok

So you think repeatedly sending messages to any telegram is ok. That's what you think?

I use telegram for some work communications. Your actions were causing headaches for all person still in that group as that chat was jumping around frantically.

5
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:08:18 pm »
Quote from: blockchained on August 25, 2020, 05:07:08 pm
Quote from: haruka on August 25, 2020, 05:00:59 pm




And now somebody have a bot to censor specific people.

But really? Adding me to your list?

Are you still sane?

abit did for months adding other admins and you were silent as I recall

Now explain that I was able to speak in the groups, until JUST NOW.

Explain the above admin operation history.

6
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:07:36 pm »
Disclaimer:

I did nothing in this drama.

I was not on any side.

I just want to make sure telegram groups are not being abused by spammers. (that's you, @blockchained. evidence below)

Then I got censored by a bot and I'm not able to say absolute anything.

Is this what you want?




7
General Discussion / Re: @Abit
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:00:59 pm »




And now somebody have a bot to censor specific people.

But really? Adding me to your list?

Are you still sane?

8
General Discussion / Re: suggestion for an committee controlled open market operation fund
« on: March 19, 2018, 05:07:39 pm »
It seems that the worker is pointing to this thread.

Please give the detailed plan of the fund operations before it's online.

I still think the whole project is not mature enough now to warrant payment from reserved fund.

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proposal: change back settle offset of bitCNY to 1%
« on: January 17, 2018, 08:13:23 am »
maybe not 1% according to bitcrab's point of view (he was saying about 3%), but 5% is apparently not correct.

10
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 针对由无限制抵押引起的连环爆仓问题
« on: January 17, 2018, 07:02:30 am »
Quote from: binggo on January 17, 2018, 06:44:37 am

强清补偿改为1%是不行的，BITCNY区需要将强清补偿保持在3%左右，现在5%是有些高了。

而且强清对高杠杆爆仓的抑制作用有限，抵押须带有惩罚机制，才能防止大机构或大资金恶意性的爆仓做空，并且可以让抵押者对自己抵押出的资金有足够的控制力，时刻关注自己的抵押仓位。

这几天BTS的下降幅度之大，之快，我想大多数抵押者在什么位置也不会感到安全。

2018/01/17 大家排队挤着爆仓的场面何其壮观。

其实正常的做空与做多都是无可厚非的。

为什么是 3%？

11
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 针对由无限制抵押引起的连环爆仓问题
« on: January 17, 2018, 05:58:48 am »
Quote from: quicksnake on January 17, 2018, 04:27:15 am
Quote from: haruka on January 16, 2018, 10:55:23 pm
btc 清算当时改成 5% 完全是为了遏制当时的形势。不知道现在为什么这么久还不改回来……

可设置的抵押率限制高了的话实践上不利于即将爆仓时的管理，我觉得慎重一些比较好，太高了对一般参与者也有影响。

1，巨蟹自己说的后面要改回来，P网已经正常一个月了，说话跟废纸一样，这样按正常来说可以被定义成什么？大的商业金融机构怎么愿意和你合作?

2，对于一般投资者，他们的投资教育本身就是不足的，还给他们加那么高杠杆的机会，是利于大户的爆仓管理了，那散户乱用杠杆呢？

3，想想当初BM做了一件错事就被驱逐了，现在我们是不是也应该干点什么？

我试试能不能推一下改回1。

现在整个 dpos 机制用户参与度明显太差了。。。

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Proposal: change back settle offset of bitCNY to 1%
« on: January 17, 2018, 05:57:02 am »
5% was a temporary solution. Now the basis of 5% no longer exists, we should change back this value to 1%.

Keeping at 5% does not make sense now.

13
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 喂价机制不除，内盘的智能货币必然无法长足发展
« on: January 16, 2018, 11:04:24 pm »
完全没有喂价的话，内盘更容易被价格操作以致连环爆仓。因为连喂价传递过程都省了，多直接。

还是需要更好的方式来确定价值。整个 smartcoin 系统工作在价值保证之上，因此如何确定价值实际上至关重要。

14
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 再次指出内盘高杠杆抵押之危害，必须马上修正爆仓机制，提高爆仓惩罚！！！不马上修正爆仓机制，必将成为内盘之殇！！！
« on: January 16, 2018, 11:01:39 pm »
另外，最近论坛里这些系统机制讨论一定不要只局限在中文论坛里，否则最终多数讨论都会没有任何实质结果。小圈子讨论在这个全球系统里实在是限制太大了。

15
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 再次指出内盘高杠杆抵押之危害，必须马上修正爆仓机制，提高爆仓惩罚！！！不马上修正爆仓机制，必将成为内盘之殇！！！
« on: January 16, 2018, 10:59:16 pm »
说到理事会，当时改手续费无故拖延了大概四五天已经能充分体现现在理事会的情况了。部分理事和外界毫无沟通意愿，令人不禁怀疑有什么 py 交易。

话说得过分了点，但是这个问题的确存在。

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 23 queries.