Author Topic: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer  (Read 7946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #45 on: February 17, 2016, 12:35:59 am »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.
Ah I guessed it was Nathan doing it.
But who is co?
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #46 on: February 17, 2016, 12:40:15 am »
What was the issue you guys solved?
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/251
We took on this one to get started in the code base as it was an easily repeatable one and it was a good match for our skill set.
Not too bad so far.
Hope you'll have more progress on the API server spamming issue, which I remember you've said earlier and is more important.
By the way, as [member=3002]theoretical[/member] mentioned, please don't close a ticket if it's not merged into the code base of next release, otherwise it may get forgotten easily.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #47 on: February 17, 2016, 12:51:11 am »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.

Extremely interesting logic. I would have used that as an argument for them to not be payed actually. Why?

There seem to be just a single person around here  who NEEDS the win build(1) (as opposed to the rest that just build those themselves). When on a 3 page thread, for more than a week this person was asking for help, they did not come up with a single comment(2)...
« Last Edit: February 17, 2016, 12:53:18 am by tonyk »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline BTSdac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: K1
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #48 on: February 17, 2016, 12:59:31 am »
what is you github account ?
github.com :pureland
BTS2.0 API :ws://139.196.37.179:8091
BTS2.0 API 数据源ws://139.196.37.179:8091

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #49 on: February 17, 2016, 01:04:27 am »
what is you github account ?
I happened to know.. it's a team. Members are dnotestein, emfrias, and maybe 2 more people.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #50 on: February 17, 2016, 01:05:20 am »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.

Extremely interesting logic. I would have used that as an argument for them to not be payed actually. Why?

There seem to be just a single person around here  who NEEDS the win build(1) (as opposed to the rest that just build those themselves). When on a 3 page thread, for more than a week this person was asking for help, they did not come up with a single comment(2)...
AFAIK the most important player who needs "official" win builds is BTC38.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #51 on: February 17, 2016, 01:19:55 am »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.

Extremely interesting logic. I would have used that as an argument for them to not be payed actually. Why?

There seem to be just a single person around here  who NEEDS the win build(1) (as opposed to the rest that just build those themselves). When on a 3 page thread, for more than a week this person was asking for help, they did not come up with a single comment(2)...
AFAIK the most important player who needs "official" win builds is BTC38.
Really? BTC38 runs on win?

PS
well at least this  explains on several levels their slooow transition to BTS2.0
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #52 on: February 17, 2016, 09:14:26 am »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.

Extremely interesting logic. I would have used that as an argument for them to not be payed actually. Why?

There seem to be just a single person around here  who NEEDS the win build(1) (as opposed to the rest that just build those themselves). When on a 3 page thread, for more than a week this person was asking for help, they did not come up with a single comment(2)...
AFAIK the most important player who needs "official" win builds is BTC38.
Really? BTC38 runs on win?

PS
well at least this  explains on several levels their slooow transition to BTS2.0
Yes, they run on win. And they don't build from source by themselves, nor trust binaries provided by others but the "official" one.

[member=11]dannotestein[/member] so when will you upload the Windows binaries of latest release (2.0.160216)? Thanks.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2016, 09:16:34 am by abit »
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline dannotestein

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 735
    • View Profile
    • BlockTrades International
  • BitShares: btsnow
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #53 on: February 17, 2016, 02:52:56 pm »
Also note that dan & co do the windows release builds.

Extremely interesting logic. I would have used that as an argument for them to not be payed actually. Why?

There seem to be just a single person around here  who NEEDS the win build(1) (as opposed to the rest that just build those themselves). When on a 3 page thread, for more than a week this person was asking for help, they did not come up with a single comment(2)...
AFAIK the most important player who needs "official" win builds is BTC38.
Really? BTC38 runs on win?

PS
well at least this  explains on several levels their slooow transition to BTS2.0
Yes, they run on win. And they don't build from source by themselves, nor trust binaries provided by others but the "official" one.

[member=11]dannotestein[/member] so when will you upload the Windows binaries of latest release (2.0.160216)? Thanks.
It's up now, we just had to finish testing it.
http://blocktrades.us Fast/Safe/High-Liquidity Crypto Coin Converter

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3302
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #54 on: February 18, 2016, 01:10:59 am »
so when will you upload the Windows binaries of latest release (2.0.160216)? Thanks.
It's up now, we just had to finish testing it.
Thanks.  +5%
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit




Offline svk

Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

Offline dannotestein

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 735
    • View Profile
    • BlockTrades International
  • BitShares: btsnow
Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« Reply #59 on: February 23, 2016, 04:17:16 am »
Here's a list of issues handled by this worker to date. Most of these were done by theoretical, other than #251 and the ones related to Windows builds, since BlockTrades has been tied up with other work for most of the period.
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/251
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/514
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/516
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/542
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/549
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/550
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/553
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/555
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/556
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/559
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/562
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/566
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/572
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/586
So is theoretical part of Blocktrades now? Or is the way this worker will function that you pay whoever happens to fix bugs in the repo? Will you pay abit too then?

Seems like a bad deal for us for the $7-8000 a month you're being paid to be honest..
No, Theo's not a part of BlockTrades. As I posted originally,  the pay was for us and for subcontractors such as CNX: I tried to be very open about that. Sometimes it will be us, sometimes CNX, and yes, potentially others as well. BM asked me to help shoulder some of the load of responding to issues in GitHub related to the blockchain as CNX was tied up with confidential transactions and other projects and Theo was basically having to manage everything on his own. That was stressing him out, and I don't blame him.
http://blocktrades.us Fast/Safe/High-Liquidity Crypto Coin Converter