Show Posts

4321

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks

« on: February 19, 2015, 09:17:15 pm »

Quote from: cube on February 14, 2015, 05:49:25 pm

Quote from: monsterer on February 14, 2015, 03:59:19 pm
Is there a way to link to a specific transaction by ID on bitsharesblocks? Like you can on blockchain.info?

I'd like to provide links to transactions for customers in metaexchange.info.

I am looking for this function too.

Edit: via api call.

Do you mean this?

Code: [Select]

blockchain_get_transaction <transaction_id_prefix> [exact]                                            Get detailed information about an in-wallet transaction

Or an api call to bitsharesblocks.com? It could be:

Code: [Select]

https://api.bitsharesblocks.com/v1/blocksbytrx/<trx_id>?callback=angular.callbacks._7

It will return a block id.

4322

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks

« on: February 19, 2015, 09:10:28 pm »

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on February 16, 2015, 10:27:49 am

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on February 10, 2015, 07:54:30 am
yet another feature request:

Can you run
Code: [Select]
blockchain_list_address_balances <address>on all active keys and list all funds when opening an account in the explorer?
Can i emphasize this feature request a little ..

I'd love to put the payouts of the charity delegates into a publicly readable address derived from an active key

I'd like this to be shown in the explorer:

Code: [Select]

blockchain_list_address_transactions <address>

as well as

Code: [Select]

blockchain_list_market_transactions <block_number>

4323

Technical Support / Re: I want to know what happened about my short orders.

« on: February 19, 2015, 07:12:55 pm »

Short order:

Code: [Select]

blockchain_list_market_transactions 1513407

Cover order:

Code: [Select]

blockchain_list_market_transactions 1769911

You shorted 8655+1743=10398 CNY with 254353+51223=305578 BTS,
your opponent added 127176.5+25611.5=152788 BTS as collateral.
When the short order expired, the market engine bought 10398 CNY with 10398/0.055~=189054 BTS for your order,
so finally you would have around 305578+152788-189054=269311 BTS.
According to your trx history, you should have 45138.6+224879.4=270018 BTS in the end, which means you lost 305578-270018=35560 BTS.
How did the number 140,000 come?

4324

Technical Support / Re: 99,003.377 BTS of Trx Fee for a cover operation in Block # 1465854 ?

« on: February 19, 2015, 05:46:07 pm »

Hopefully it will be fixed in v0.7
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/1385

4325

中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTS限价兑换平台试运行

« on: February 12, 2015, 04:58:23 pm »

间隔时间太长，等的心焦啊。

4326

Technical Support / Re: Missing allocation funds?

« on: February 10, 2015, 07:05:22 pm »

Maybe this helps:
http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Best_Practices/RecoverFunds

4327

Technical Support / Re: it must be a BUG in shorting

« on: February 10, 2015, 05:50:35 pm »

The balance became less while voting at block 1720344:

Code: [Select]

>> blockchain_get_block_transactions 1720344

[[
    "e102d6eb0548991d403ec5c76f192469bc351faf",{
      "trx": {
        "expiration": "2015-02-06T17:57:24",
        "reserved": null,
        "operations": [{
            "type": "deposit_op_type",
            "data": {
              "amount": 136891179999,
              "condition": {
                "asset_id": 0,
                "slate_id": 1832704065200434438,
                "type": "withdraw_signature_type",
                "data": {
                  "owner": "BTSEnUYHEkFKX31A97VKyf7TvjZJZHHCLNmV",
                  "memo": {
                    "one_time_key": "BTS5NQPijZu4kw9hFjsAdY2R1trLjRmnpAs2cWgvrRB2ekyeuJYzv",
                    "encrypted_memo_data": "6bb9c247b7e665c4e5c6b6e1cd6249efe66b18fee2c99cae1265d0ed0280d52d2e9e85f92f57a9e826e7d6c45ca2a1d7c597243e8431be3eea8ffed6eb760530"
                  }
                }
              }
            }
...
            },{
            "type": "withdraw_op_type",
            "data": {
              "balance_id": "BTSH3F7MrM6fgavoAdJVXvHiqUxdVF7ZCkL2",
              "amount": 136891189999,
              "claim_input_data": ""
            }
          }
        ]

So there must be something happened at that address between block 1670016 and 1720344. Maybe another short operation(s)?

4328

Technical Support / Re: it must be a BUG in shorting

« on: February 10, 2015, 05:14:24 pm »

After the vote the balance is moved to BTSAyTEvB7WkJXxJExaWPqcgkhpdSnYDvDFD

Code: [Select]

(wallet closed) >>> blockchain_get_block_transactions 1670016
[[
    "8a0b6d297be9438cc8ba3385c6c78caa565f2da7",{
      "trx": {
        "expiration": "2015-01-31T21:32:28",
        "slate_id": null,
        "operations": [{
             "type": "deposit_op_type",
            "data": {
              "amount": 156891229999,
              "condition": {
                "asset_id": 0,
                "slate_id": 3370756005476532118,
                "type": "withdraw_signature_type",
                "data": {
                  "owner": "BTSAyTEvB7WkJXxJExaWPqcgkhpdSnYDvDFD",
                  "memo": {
                    "one_time_key": "BTS7HrbzaiMqkUeTsV8fryJvZ8SX5mR9GfPhdThkqLdgDfVtXazZm",
                    "encrypted_memo_data": "59a835bf20476cf790bee36c4fedd4c1956437f8e8b737e4c174ca89f94221e285a3fe0fb74371ed05bb53d94e17e454c0527126bc0a22929e9618415ea1fb24"
                  }
                }
              }
            }
          }
...

However it's 0 again

Code: [Select]

>> blockchain_list_address_balances BTSAyTEvB7WkJXxJExaWPqcgkhpdSnYDvDFD

[[
    "BTSH3F7MrM6fgavoAdJVXvHiqUxdVF7ZCkL2",{
      "condition": {
        "asset_id": 0,
        "slate_id": 3370756005476532118,
        "type": "withdraw_signature_type",
        "data": {
          "owner": "BTSAyTEvB7WkJXxJExaWPqcgkhpdSnYDvDFD",
          "memo": {
            "one_time_key": "BTS7HrbzaiMqkUeTsV8fryJvZ8SX5mR9GfPhdThkqLdgDfVtXazZm",
            "encrypted_memo_data": "59a835bf20476cf790bee36c4fedd4c1956437f8e8b737e4c174ca89f94221e285a3fe0fb74371ed05bb53d94e17e454c0527126bc0a22929e9618415ea1fb24"
          }
        }
      },
      "balance": 0,
      "restricted_owner": null,
      "snapshot_info": null,
      "deposit_date": "2015-01-31T20:27:20",
      "last_update": "2015-02-06T16:50:00",
      "meta_data": null
    }
  ]
]

Quote from: iamabtsgirl on February 10, 2015, 03:22:15 pm

following is the output . but nothing return back to my account . that 100K is still missing

I just remembered that I canceled the short order and did "vote_all" right after then the 100K never back to my wallet.

If you can identify this problem then it is a good chance to catch this bug.

Code: [Select]
wallet_scan_transaction 8a0b6d297be9438cc8ba3385c6c78caa565f2da7 true TIMESTAMP BLOCK FROM TO AMOUNT MEMO FEE ID ======================================================================================================================================================================== |2015-01-31T20:27:30 1670016 SHORT-78364eb0 UNKNOWN 1,568,912.39999 BTS 0.10000 BTS 8a0b6d29| | f****u f****u 1,568,912.29999 BTS vote_all | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: vikram on February 10, 2015, 02:12:39 am
What is output if you do "wallet_scan_transaction 8a0b6d297be9438cc8ba3385c6c78caa565f2da7 true" ?

4329

General Discussion / Re: First ecommerce bitshares cart plugin dev cycle complete

« on: February 01, 2015, 08:01:30 am »

Quote from: davidpbrown on February 01, 2015, 07:27:28 am

Quote from: jsidhu on February 01, 2015, 06:36:16 am
Checkout the drupal7 demo ive added bitshares login!
http://www.bitsharesdemo.com/drupal7/

That's cool but if it's possible to test for protocol beforehand that might be better than user stumbling into an error such as:
Quote
The address wasn't understood
Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because one of the following protocols (bts) isn't associated with any program or is not allowed in this context.
You might need to install other software to open this address.

I'm on Linux, perhaps BitShares creates a protocol link in Windohs+?

Yes it works in windows.

4330

中文 (Chinese) / 谁帮忙把这个翻译一下？

« on: February 01, 2015, 07:33:52 am »

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=13904.0
看起来很有意思

4331

中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股竞猜停止运营这么久的原因

« on: February 01, 2015, 07:32:01 am »

不喜欢明文密码的做法。
每次打开钱包，就看到自己的密码在交易历史里蹦出来，感觉非常不好。
直接用钱包验证登录多好。

4332

Technical Support / Re: 0.5.3 RPC calls timeout constantly, taking more than 10s

« on: February 01, 2015, 02:31:32 am »

Quote from: monsterer on January 31, 2015, 07:23:41 pm

I've got a lot of problems with the RPC server lagging badly and failing to respond to requests in a timely fashion. There have been 40 odd RPC call timeouts in the last 10 minutes, with a 10 second timeout. There is no heavy lifting going on in the RPC calls, just simple stuff.

My wallet is open, unlocked and producing blocks.

What can I do?

I recommend do not use the delegate wallet as your rpc server for your website or other purpose, leave it as a delegate only, and use another wallet for your website, so that you can restart the wallet when you need without risk of missing blocks.

4333

中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股推广的“误区"，寻找“纽约引爆点”

« on: January 31, 2015, 07:38:49 am »

Quote from: wuxuqiang on January 30, 2015, 04:56:43 pm

Quote from: callmeluc on January 30, 2015, 09:10:58 am

也就是说，只有涨才能够支撑这样的高利息。同时也意味着，涨了，进来的资金要付出很大部分给利息。谁来买涨？

这总体来讲要求BTS一年涨12%。现就在当BTS0.1元。涨12%也才0.112元这能达到吧？
当然了这是理想化状态。BTS一年不涨，或下跌多有可能。
12%不算多。比特币曾经涨了多少？
(利息来讲是short者支付的。但BTS一个月涨1%。就可以抵消他付出的利息支出。"做空"short出bitcny.就是看涨BTS，有多赚“币”的)

个人感觉不妥

4334