Quote from: abit on November 17, 2014, 09:35:28 am

在英文社区看到有帖子提到这个事，但是没找到详细说明，例如为什么要花，如何花。
谁知道的麻烦出来说下，谢谢。

AGS是I3的捐赠收入，捐赠在本年年底就要收35%的税，所以I3直接预先支付给各个开发者，这就是“花光”的意思。

Quote from: abit on November 17, 2014, 12:26:24 pm

Image when the price of bts get rising.. It should be much more than that.
Don't just look at current price.

Did you read the OP? The very point of this post is the problem *with* using the current price.

as for the delegates , we encourage them not to sell

Quote from: cn-members on November 17, 2014, 11:53:55 am

Oh , I see where you are wrong .
There will not be 101 100% delegates .
By my est , there will only be 10-25 delegates who can have 100% payrate .
More than that , shareholders won't approve .
At this point , it's not even that easy to get all the developers to get a 100% delegate seat .

My calculations assume worst case, yes, but this is not an error, just the opposite end of the estimation bound.

So, lower bound is $200 / month, upper bound is $2500 / month.

bounty fund ....good  idea

the community can control the spending rate , easy to monitor the workers instead of a steady paycheck....

What we need is a script that will burn fees daily that we can verify.

I feel like I asked this question before but... can we verify burned funds yet ?

This still has problems, the main one being there are not enough people willing to watch everyone.. but the verifiable burning ability needs to be in place first.

This way I could #1 create a delegate at 100%.  #2 when elected I just burn all funds or maybe 99%.  Whatever.  #3 When we know what has most value, I can stop burning and provide accountability towards that goal (instead of accountability of burning).

1,2,3.... what am I missing.  Too many control freaks though. Too many managers with expectations too high.


Bad idea?  Good idea?