Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - karnal

Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 72
916
I did think about that some time after posting but eventually forgot and didn't come back to clarify. I'm glad you brought it up.


Having said that, do you have a timeline for the beginning stages of BTC/LTC/DASH implementation?

And how do you plan to convert the miners to use your system? Here you are preaching to the choir of course (I do believe your idea has merit).


Finally, regarding approving all your delegates, I was under the impression (do correct if I'm wrong) that voting for more than one delegate from the same entity is to be frowned upon, as it puts too much power in the hands of a single entity/person/organization ?

In other words, why displace 5ish other delegates with yours ? And do you believe this to be fair? (neutral/probing question)


Looking forward to evaluate your response.

917
If you are extra generous you can run a full-node chain server to help with fast syncing

Please elaborate ? I would be very interested to know more.

Is there an up-to-date wiki/article about node types in BitShares?

918
Interesting. Thanks for clearing that up pc.

919
Cool guys, this is exactly the info I was looking for.

And thanks Ken for summoning the right people :)


One last question related to this, if you're not aiming for paid delegate position, is there any benefit to the network from running under-101 delegates?

I realize that these wouldn't sign blocks, but do they help with client syncing? Any other functions they would have?


920
General Discussion / Re: POLONIEX now KYC compliant
« on: May 19, 2015, 08:00:22 am »
Sure, I can loan to you at 90% interest, and you can choose not to use my (totally legit!) service.

Still, would it not be greed on my part?

921
General Discussion / Imagine..
« on: May 19, 2015, 07:56:17 am »
This came to me in a dream last night..


Crypto enthusiasts are likely, in my experience, to see cryptocurrency as alternatives to the banking system.
As we know here in the forum (but the rest of the world doesn't, see https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16399.0.html), BitShares is probably the best bet to preserve crypto wealth. BTC and the others are just too volatile.

I wouldn't be confortable storing my life saving  in Bitcoin because of that. But in a mixture of BitAssets? Don't see why not (when we get past 1.0 though :D).


Now, one thing led to another and I was asking myself before falling asleep.. but what about normal users, people who are not in this to be shareholders, people who just want to do their shopping online and what not. Surely BitUSD is a better choice for that than BTC, but BTC having first mover advantage.. it's not going to be easy to displace.

At this point remember one of the unique feats of BitShares.. it allows for storing wealth in BitAssets.


And here is what came to me in the dream.. what if instead of aligning ourselves against evil greedy banks in the good fight against tyranny (tm).. what if we integrate bitshares with the banking system?

Preposterous, you say! Allow me to further explain.
Keep in mind this is geared for normal users, chances are you or me wouldn't do it like this. Because we prefer having the control over our wealth. Because we prefer the increased privacy that BitShares+TITAN can provide.

Realize though that for most people these are not true. It's probably only  a matter of time until Jane Doe loses all her funds due to not having a backup or the wallet, or if this thing takes off, you can bet that there will be many a malware waiting behind that click to penetrate your BTS like Sansa Stark couldn't even imagine.


So, say Jane has an account at HSBC. She wants to send some money to her daughter who happens to be studying in Kenya!
At the present moment her options are basically a wire transfer (fees) or Western Union (moar fees). [Yes, BTC would work; if it's cashed out quickly the wealth should be preserved.. but how many Janes have you seen using BTC lately?]

What if BitAssets were integrated into Jane's bank system, and she could simply do a "BitShares transfer" from the online banking page ?

Let us say this is a transfer made in USD. Jane has no BitUSD, but she has USD.
So Jane goes online, sends 2000 USD to her daughter who is in Kenya, and selects "Use the BTS Network (TM) for this transfer".

Instead of outrageous fees and waiting for a few days, there are no fees (though banks being banks, they will probably still charge a very small fee), and it is instant.

The USD gets deducted from her account, the bank sends BitUSD to the bank in Kenya with a memo identifying her daughters' account, and instantly the daughter gets the money (the BitUSD are converted to USD as needed).


For a non-technical person who already has a bank account, this has several advantages:
  - 0 setup time.
  - Not giving personal data to yet another company.
  - None/low fees, instant transfers, vs lots of fees and waiting for days.

The Bank wins something here as well since they are likely to charge a small fee for processing it through BitShares. Fine, Jane thinks. Better pay $5 than $50.

BitShares sees widespread adoption and shareholders are happy (and for some reason all smoking lots of cuban cigars).


Now I'm not saying it would be easy to have the banks integrate their systems with the BitShares network... but I am saying that with focused effort it could be possible.



What do you think? Pipe dream? Any angle I missed ? (It was only a dream, after all :D)




922
General Discussion / Re: POLONIEX now KYC compliant
« on: May 19, 2015, 07:29:40 am »
Well, that sucks.
I don't have funds there, but does this say you can't get them out unless you fill in the KYC forms?

It is not that so much as it is not knowing any other non-fiat exchange with such a wide selection of coins [edit: where verification is not necessary].

Quote
When your loans are being used by margin traders, you are earning interest on them, which is paid to your lending account when a contract closes. (Poloniex takes a fee of 15% from the interest you earn, so be sure to consider that when you place your offers.) Your active contracts are listed under My Active Loans.

wow.... https://poloniex.com/support/aboutMarginTrading

Such greed. Wow.

923
DataSecurityNode, I like this idea and wish you great success, however the lack of BTC/LTC/DASH seems like an oversight to me.

In my understanding it is exactly the miners of said coins who would benefit the most from storing their earnings in BitUSD. Frankly, who cares about potcoin?


For that reason alone I am not voting right now, but will follow any developments closely. Good luck with your project!

924
Did I miss anything, why no BTC LTC or DASH?

Top coin being mined is potcoin.. yeah.

Please elaborate on this, vote pending.

925
Would favorite this if supported.

926
1: Not exactly UI-related, at least directly: Make the faucet register accounts as TITAN or at least provide the user with the choice, possibly defaulting to TITAN

2: Some visual indicator about whether my own account(s) is/are titan-enabled, and likewise whenever sending to another account a visual indicator of whether said account is also TITAN.

3: SOCKS5/HTTP Proxy support configurable in settings.

4: "Shareholders responsibilities" disclaimer, about voting, why it's important, and a link to a well written wiki page describing it further. Shown at startup with checkbox to not show again.

927
Greetings,

I am wondering if anyone who is presently running a node could comment on disk space requirements / CPU% usage / used memory when running bitshares continuously.


For a knowledgeable developer, I would also like to ask how much was the code written with portability in mind - will it run easily on BSD and Solaris?

928
General Discussion / Re: POLONIEX now KYC compliant
« on: May 18, 2015, 09:20:13 pm »
Well, that sucks.

929
Nullstreet Journal ... that is what shareholders or investors want to read IMO ...

True! +5%

 +5%

930
I really don't get the issue. Isn't there a PUBLIC DATA section?

If shareholders deem it necessary that delegates produce reports regularly, then DON'T VOTE FOR THOSE WHO DON'T!

Isn't the voting for things such as this ? Rather than hardcoding an evergrowing amount of rules into the system.


Personally I couldn't care any less about the reports. Am I going to read 101 reports a month? No.
Are most shareholders? Probably not.

However would I scroll through the list of active delegates now and then and have a look here in the forum (& possibly at their website) regarding their latest feats? Sure thing. Would I not approve a delegate who's been public exposed as riding the gravy train? You bet.

It's good to have the choice.

Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 72