121
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about DEX usability for guests
« on: February 05, 2017, 08:07:47 pm »
To enter exchange without account you must switch into advanced (normal) mode.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
122
General Discussion / Just an idea I want to share. [sci-fi]
« on: February 05, 2017, 12:48:08 am »
I was thinking about contract that pays you token if you pay into reserve pool at 1 x feed price . Token issued by contract is pegged to feed and can't be destroyed. The peg is kept by faith of the players. Faith is measured by power of believers (issued supply).
Transaction is proof of transmutation.
Market could start as a community game, for fun.
Transaction is proof of transmutation.
Market could start as a community game, for fun.
123
General Discussion / Re: Integrate Hardware Wallet into the Bitshares DEX??
« on: February 03, 2017, 09:22:11 pm »
I don't understand much but read comments: https://steemit.com/steem/@svk/trezor-hackathon-putting-steem-on-the-trezor
124
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [worker] Python-steem and uptick (1.14.52)
« on: February 03, 2017, 09:10:25 pm »
I would love to read more about trading part. For now I see one simple scheme.
1. Multisig borrow USD and send to worker.
2. next day worker make sell order 5% above feed at USD:BTS
3. Multisig fill worker orders and send USD to worker again.
5.Repeat
If this is the case, why 5%?
1. Multisig borrow USD and send to worker.
2. next day worker make sell order 5% above feed at USD:BTS
3. Multisig fill worker orders and send USD to worker again.
5.Repeat
If this is the case, why 5%?
125
Technical Support / Re: Failed to sync with the API server
« on: February 02, 2017, 02:01:07 pm »
Maybe chat related. Have you tried to disable it?
126
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about Max Supply of UIA
« on: January 31, 2017, 10:38:35 pm »
Leave it as is and add lock supply flag for those who want.
@fav not in GUI for sure.
@fav not in GUI for sure.
127
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Spice up your bitshares videos with my creations
« on: January 30, 2017, 10:07:31 pm »
I think it's great.
128
General Discussion / Re: Number of trades keeps increasing. Still need data on volume though.
« on: January 30, 2017, 09:40:45 pm »
Because owner of Cryptofresh working on Steemit and doesn''t pay enough attention to it.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=22107.0
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=22107.0
129
General Discussion / Re: Number of trades keeps increasing. Still need data on volume though.
« on: January 30, 2017, 05:57:48 pm »
Cryptofresh is not reliable.
130
General Discussion / Re: Things that needs to be fixed with bitshares imo
« on: January 28, 2017, 02:56:35 pm »
Minimum collateral for USD is 175%. Just use this GUI https://bitshares.org/download
131
Technical Support / Re: Where are the collateral positions on the wallet gone?
« on: January 21, 2017, 04:29:32 pm »
Openledger doesn't show collateral positions under account overview. It is their bug or... feature.
Use official GUI, it's safer for your funds, offers lower minimum collateral and better overview page (collateral positions included)
Use official GUI, it's safer for your funds, offers lower minimum collateral and better overview page (collateral positions included)
132
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BlockPay -Your favorite store can now accept any crypto thanx to Bitshares
« on: January 20, 2017, 07:10:06 pm »
Gatekeeper.
133
General Discussion / Re: Incentivize SmartCoin collateralization
« on: January 19, 2017, 01:30:50 am »
http://cryptofresh.com/fees
What about:
if order price sits between lowest ask and highest bid AND volume of order is higher than (some amount in BTS)
THEN Limit Orders Create fee = 0 ( because this order provides usable liquidity and better peg).
Then what about:
If order price is not between ask <->bid, but there is no matching orders and order volume is more than (some ammount in BTS)
THEN Order Create fee = 0.050 BTS (order provides liquidity, increasing market depth)
Next:
if order pirce looks like above but order volume is higher than (some lower than above ammount in BTS)
THEN Order Create fee = 0.100
(Can be more steps if needed)
And final:
If order price doesn't meet above criteria fee = 0.247 BTS ( Market taker should pay higher fees, as a compensation for destroying market depth... but no to high, we need him also)
For preventing abuse some other changes must be applied, for example:
Cancel of 100% unfilled order shouldn't be free.
Also i think this scheme should be limited only for committee Smartcoins and (step amounts in BTS) should be smartcoin option.
UIA's could be abused for cheap spam, so not good idea.
Is this to complex, impossible or can be abused? Zero or super low fees for big market makers would be nice feature also from marketing perspective.
134
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 17, 2017, 05:04:18 pm »I hope to add in new drop-down menus to the right of 'Deposit/Withdraw', linking to the other web wallets (OpenLedger, FreedomLedger, BTSABC, etc) and to BOINC/BTS/Gridcoin community links. The *.JSX is a tad confusing though..I think (but not sure) something similar to this should work:
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/blob/master/web/app/components/Layout/Header.jsx#L227
It can be used later somewhere in return (line 246).
135
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 15, 2017, 02:46:54 pm »
@yvv It makes sense. Lower required collateral for everyone without any negative impact(?). Sounds great.
In current state some shorters can borrow more for less.
@EstefanTT
Anyone can do the changes and run own client. Current limitation is false.
@svk can change this for all users, with new gui release.
In current state some shorters can borrow more for less.
@EstefanTT
Anyone can do the changes and run own client. Current limitation is false.
@svk can change this for all users, with new gui release.
