1) Drop all other BitShares brands.... rename BitShares X to just BitShares
2) End PTS... BitShares will evolve to incorporate every possible feature that stakeholders vote on.
3) If there is a clone then it should start out with stakeholders it thinks are best... because BitShares holders are uniting.
4) Add stake holder approved dilution without limit to BitShares X.
5) Bring in all AGS holders and given them a stake in BitShares X that cannot be moved for 6 months... the ratio that this stake should be given should be equal to PTS market cap... so $5 million or 10% dilution of BTSX allocated to these individuals. This is effectively BTSX buying out our competition.
6) Bring in one last PTS snapshot also valued at $5 million for another 10% dilution of BTSX... 6 months until funds could be spent... buy out this competition and end PTS.
7) Our team will focus on no other DACs other than BitShares in general and work to make it the most robust and *FLEXIBLE* DAC out there.
1) OK
2) OK, this was discussed and I think majority wants PTS on BTSX chain as user issued asset
3) ...
4) This is controversial. On one side dilution is beneficial. On the other side it breaks all the promises for max 2B BTSX. I'm neutral here = "accept majority".
5) I'm strongly against evaluating PTS at current prices and buying all of it with dilluted BTSX. There are majority of reasons against this:
0 Breaking all previous promises!
1 One might not want to sell at this prices. This essentially forces them to sell for BTSX at current prices.
2 This is unfair to PTS/AGS holders as they will not get the promised stake in future DACs.
3 Furthermore the original concept was UNDILLUTABLE 10% PTS, 10% AGS and 80% of the DAC distributed how developers see fit. These 80% used by developer might be extremely beneficial as development resource, marketing , operational funds. With the new scheme AGS and PTS both get dillutable 10%. And 80% distributed to BTSX stakeholders. And any development must be funded by dillutuion. Which is unfair to AGS/PTS.
7) OK
I agree that there should be unification of GENESIS assets. However I don't see the proposed solution as fair. What I propose for 6) is to just transfer AGS and PTS to a bitassets and keep the promises.
Another option would be to define dillutiable and non-dillutable BTSX. Where the non-dillutable are created from snapshotting PTS/AGS.