I would like to see how the Banks can directly benefit of this, and why they will use this, instead of other technologies. If banks are expecting to save billions using blockchain technology it will be great to see how can this help them.
OK, say you are a bank, and your boss wants you to "adopt blockchain tech" because "everyone's doing it"
and you have $5 million budget.
You can either hire a team of lawyers and people to perform and maintain the KYC requirements. You end up spending $4.8 million, and receive the $200,000 difference as your christmas bonus
Or you outsource all KYC requirements to IDentibit (for zero dollars) and pocket the whole $5 million as a christmas bonus!
IDentibit provides blockchain KYC to any banks (or company that wants to do business in NY)(bitlicense) FOR FREE!!
What would a bank or any crypto biz have to pay in order to maintain KYC data on all its crypto customers? Not anymore.
I like this project and think it has potential. The one thing that seems unprofessional to me is the name itself. I would stay away from any and all cliches like "bit" for example. I would opt for a name that has nothing to do with cryptocurrency. Example: Ethereum, Ripple, Stellar, Graphene. These are all great names.
Good point! Although having the "ident" in the name helps a lot for a contrast full media battle.
To me the main pain with the name is its length.
You are absolutely correct, having the "ident" in the name is extremely helpful in getting this coin adopted globally.
This is why we are officially changing the "ident" to "adent"
"IDentitibit" will from now on be known as "inentabit"
because we do not want to be helpful, and arbitrarily changing the spelling of the root concept "identity" to "identatity" guarantees user confusion, leaving the door wide open for a catchy $110 market cap Ethereum or $250 million market cap Ripple to rip our idea off by releasing a competing business model named:
"bitKYC"
What functionality does Ethereum have (or promise to have in the future) over BitShares? How much does the name "Ethereum" contribute to its current 10x market cap advantage over BitShares?
I don't think that people are grasping the impact that this concept will have.
The US government said that cryptocurrencies can compete legally with the USD, but only if you do what this coin does for you for free.
so why not change the name to
freeKYC
that way you will have an intuitive grasp of what this coin is and what it can do for you without having to ask:
how do you spell that?
Don't worry, the Ethereum team will soon show you how to take over this lucrative market again.