Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rune

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 75
76
We all need to remove every single BTS we own from all exchanges. 

When we want to buy BTS, we deposit money on the exchange, buy BTS, and immediately remove it.  Always.  Immediately.

When we want to trade we use the Bitshares Decentralized exchange exclusively.  Only ever send BTS back to exchanges for permanent cashing out.


Please give me a time machine so I can go back and do this with bter.  I will only ever use the decentralized exchange ever again.  Hopefully many of us will learn this lesson from the bter hack in a way that doesnt cost us much except for pain, or a little BTC.  I don't ever plan to have much BTS on an exchange for more than like an hour or so, ever again.

Please tell me how you plan to get your money into the decentralized exchange if there's no open orders on poloniex or btc38. Or even better, how do you expect new users who have no experience with bitshares, who don't even know what the decentralized exchange is, to get their money on to it?

77
Isnt the way to encourage a rally to take BTS OFF the exchanges? - make it scarce.

When a new user wants to get into bitshares, what they will do is to look at CMC for which exchanges have any volume. If there's no exchange with any BTS/BTC volume then theres no way for them to get in. They'll give up and will not become a new user.

Trying to "encourage" a rally by reducing liquidity and volume is probably about the most counterproductive thing you could do.

On the other hand if we take a price rally and turn it into higher liquidity and new users, then it will become something that actually gives us long term value, which is the only thing we are interested in.

Quote
Anyone who is actively trading should be using the BitBTC market anyway.

When poloniex gets goxxed, I will shed more crocodile tears.

not sure if serious...

78
+5%
I'm glad to see BTS in just a few months has turned you from an optimist to a pessimist lol.

Mostly its just made me really mad at bter. :P

Seriously. Fuck bter.

79
Despite the recent terrible setback of bter getting hacked I think bitshares could be looking at least at a medium sized rally coming up, since we're currently so ridiculously undervalued.

However if such a rally is to get us any new users we need a way they can easily get into BTS, and unfortunately bter took that away from us. We can't expect new users to go through the painful btc38 user experience, so I think anyone who's actively trading should be moving some of their funds to poloniex so we can get some volume and a populated order book going. This will also have the effect of reducing shapeshifts currently crazy high spread for BTS.

Who's with me in getting some walls going? :)

80
Somebody placed a buy order for 200 CFSUSDA at 1.000 bitUSD

You will not get your order filled because the price is 1.001 bitUSD

That's me, in case people want to withdraw their funds again. I will try to always maintain a buy order and if it gets sold it into I will pull funds from the bots to put up there. This way people can deposit and withdraw funds from the operation whenever they want to.

81
Quote
If you want to help fund the liquidity of the bot, then go to the internal exchange and search for CFSUSDA:bitUSD. It is sold like CFSGOLD, 1:1 for bitUSD with a 0.1% fee, and will increase in NAV as the bot makes a profit off market making.

Stupid question : I manage to install 0.6.1 but I can't find CFSUSDA:bitUSD on the internal exchange. Looking under UIA tag and search nothing there. What I'm doing wrong ?

I think you just have to wait and retry later, sometimes the wallet just doesn't show the UIA's.

82
Could we please have an update. Is the bitUSD bot running at Yunbi?

It's running :)

All bitUSD received has been sent to the bot, with a small float sitting as open bids on the CFSUSDA order book to buy back.

You can check out the bot here: https://yunbi.com/markets/bitusdbtc

They really need to swap that pair around. People are used to thinking of Bitcoin in terms of whole dollars, not dollars in terms of microfractions of Bitcoin.

Totally... The current way it's done is really stupid. It does have one small advantage, that we won't have to spam coinmarketcap for ages to get them to add it into their bitUSD volume.

83
Could we please have an update. Is the bitUSD bot running at Yunbi?

It's running :)

All bitUSD received has been sent to the bot, with a small float sitting as open bids on the CFSUSDA order book to buy back.

You can check out the bot here: https://yunbi.com/markets/bitusdbtc

84
Every time I've asked them for updates they have simply referred to the twitter. I think it's almost certain that they will return all other cryptocurrencies. If their altcoins had been stolen it would have been clearly announced already. Their twitter talks about returning CNY and USD (without a haircut). In the same sentence they reference returning NXT and other altcoins. It's implied that there will be no haircut on altcoins, since 1) they would have been very explicit about it if they planned to do so, 2) they would also mention returning bitcoins since the bitcoins would get a portion of what was cut off from the alts. I guess we might be looking at getting 0% bitcoin back, that's the one thing that sucks.

85
The plan is to reward it in CFSCOIN. It will not be liquid for a while but will gain its value from 30% of the income through a buy&burn bot that buys and reduces supply, increasing price.

Since there's little volume traded for UIAs, what happens in the event I need to sell and there are no buyers?  Or will there be a margin call?  Sorry if that's a stupid question but I haven't read-up on the trading details in awhile.

CFSCOIN will be meant as a long term investment. At first there will likely be no market at all and it will be effectively worthless, until cryptohedge starts to generate enough income to bid up the price.

86
General Discussion / Re: CFSBTC limited sale begins
« on: February 18, 2015, 03:24:27 pm »
Taking bitBTC instead of BTC will be possible for a small amount. I will put up a sell order for 5 btc on the internal market as test later.
not seeing it ..  :-\

Yeah, sorry. For some reason I can't get the CFSBTC:bitBTC market to show in my client so I just gave up for now. Will keep trying and put it up if I can get it to work.

87
I see a CFSUSD/BitUSD ......... but no CFSUSDA/BitUSD?

It usually can take a while before new assets show up. Try to restart your client or wait a bit.

There will be an early funder reward for CFSUSDA similar to other CFS assets, but since the bter hack made everything a lot more complicated we won't announce what the reward will be until we know the outcome of the bter situation.

Will the reward be in CFSCOIN?  I'm new to the concept so can you tell me how liquid these assets will be?  I'm asking because the market action on the exchange seems non-existent so it's unclear to me how I can calculate risk.  As I've said before, I'd love to help since the concept of investing in a hedging bot interest me greatly but I'm still trying to grasp the details.

The plan is to reward it in CFSCOIN. It will not be liquid for a while but will gain its value from 30% of the income through a buy&burn bot that buys and reduces supply, increasing price.

How much liquidity do you need (bitUSD) to get the bot started at the YunBi BTC/BitUSD market?

We will put any amount we get on there. Even 1 bitUSD helps.

88
Poloniex is now displaying USDT as the main USD. What a missed opportunity, it could've been BitUSD.

It couldn't. BitUSD would have to have a highly liquid bitUSD/USD market for this to be feasible. We're still far from that.

89
It pains me to have to ask for more funds while we have client funds outstanding and no idea when, and even how much, it will be possible to pay back.

But the YunBi BTC/BitUSD market is now operational and the market maker bot is ready to create liquidity, but since all of our CFSUSD funds are locked up on bter there's no other way than ask the community for more money. It's important we get YunBi liquid as soon as possible so shapeshift can resume bitUSD service again.

It's hard to say but I do believe that YunBi seem more competent than bter and I don't think we have to fear their cold wallet can get hacked the same as bter's was.

If you want to help fund the liquidity of the bot, then go to the internal exchange and search for CFSUSDA:bitUSD. It is sold like CFSGOLD, 1:1 for bitUSD with a 0.1% fee, and will increase in NAV as the bot makes a profit off market making. Eventually we will merge this temporary asset with CFSUSD once the full situation from bter is understood. We will try to keep a minimal amount of the funds on YunBi, and deposit and withdraw them according to the bots needs.

There will be an early funder reward for CFSUSDA similar to other CFS assets, but since the bter hack made everything a lot more complicated we won't announce what the reward will be until we know the outcome of the bter situation.

Meanwhile we will continue to work on how to get the CFSUSD and CFSGOLD funds out of bter and find out the best model for compensating clients.

90
General Discussion / Re: Cryptohedge and the bter hack
« on: February 16, 2015, 05:59:00 pm »
Rune, did you think about increasing liquidity on the DEX instead of on centralized exchanges? What obstacles would you face there?

The biggest problem bitshares has at the moment is that we need an easy way to get in and out of bitassets from bitcoin. Unfortunately we cannot provide this in any other way than on centralized exchanges.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 75