I like the new platform, but still feel left out due to that ags issue. No ags > no graphene > no steemit.
This statement is completely false.
All AGS was able to do is get to BitShares 0.9.3c, with Vote, DNS, Play, and Muse all sucking wind looking for funding. Yet to this day AGS holders are still gaining vesting BTS shares.
The Cryptonomex team spent a whole year developing Graphene on its own sweat equity . Yet, still gave it all away to the community.
Then we spun off Steemit with new players and their new sweat equity building on Graphene but nothing that was originally funded by PTS/AGS/BTS.
Now Cryptonomex is working to do even more for this community with even more resources that do not come from BTS, AGS, or PTS.
I don't know what it takes to earn trust around here, but I am not impressed with the entitlement attitudes that imply we can never do enough.
How about delivering something to the BTS community instead of just "new investment opportunities". I think everyone here has had enough of buying the next best thing (AGS/PTS/DNS/Brownies/BTS0.9/BTS2/Steem).
There were constant pump posts to buy bts based on "summer announcements" that never came to fruition. Investors here feel like they were promised business development, but when everything fell through Bytemaster just jumped ship to a new platform. It didn't help that he promoted doing sharedrops and abandoned this on the first new chain that he created.
You are saying CNX is doing things behind the scenes, but that has been the story for the last year... Nothing has been seen or delivered other than 2.0 itself. This would all be cleared up if CNX created a worker proposal for a collateralized bond market or maker taker.
...and that's why I no longer publish details about what we are working on. 90% of all leads fail. I tried sharing this stuff with you but all I got were posts like this. Now you'll just have to wait and be surprised.
Then why did you even ask what it takes to earn trust around here?
I'm guessing you knew what the answer would be. Why not comment on the idea of doing a worker proposal?
Proposals are based in part on what resources are available to work on them.
Resources are hired based on the availability of stable funding.
A constant battle over who controls the funding light switch means no one dares hire against any line item.
So the resources remain allocated elsewhere
That excuse was already addressed by me in that thread. A CNX proposal has never even been created. You will have a valid argument if you create a proposal, get voted in, then get voted out. Until then, your argument above isn't valid.
Xeroc is the largest proxy and could pretty much vote in any proposal he wanted. I'm sure you wouldn't have to worry about stable funding.
The problem i'm seeing with CNX ability in gaining trust is their "it's not our fault" attitude. You guys designed and managed the system for years... you take all the credit for the success's but try to deflect any of the problems.
"A good leader takes a little more than his share of the blame, a little less than his share of the credit." --Arnold Glasow