Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - oco101

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 40
Technical Support / Re: BTS wallet will not open
« on: January 23, 2015, 03:50:16 am »
I had the same thing. Go in Task manager and make sure that there is no instance of Bitshare running.

General Discussion / Re: Blog Post Suggestions for BM & Co
« on: January 22, 2015, 08:24:01 pm »

But what about other intellectual property? What are your views?

Not really bitshares related, I know. But I suppose a blockchain would make a great patent office.

This is a Dac proposition back in the time by bytemaster  :

Wow look at that !!! That says a lot about how innovative Bitshares is, of course don't expect any credit to be given ...

This is a user on reddit :
Bitcoin is now a decentralized company. The product we create we give to ourselves to sell back to ourselves to fund our own research and development. Brilliant.

This idea Bitcoin as a decentralized company is clearly bytemasters preaching.....

Here is  quote from their forum rules  :
Post your coin thread and link your communities to it, so they can come support your coin. Inclusion to the Casheer platform is based on demand.

General Discussion / Re: Marketing BitGold inc
« on: January 22, 2015, 03:44:44 am »
Wow great work rgcrypto amazing.  Hope people notice and vote for you(I already did), you contribution is invaluable and you use your own time and money to do all that. Thank you !!

edit :  I see you put the link to  the would have been event better, but unfortunately it does not look like much is happening there lately.

General Discussion / Re: A New Perspective on NuBits [BLOG POST]
« on: January 15, 2015, 01:06:45 pm »

I couldn't resist one last blog post because I didn't want the "Ponzi Post" to be the last post for a while.  After discussions on this forum I have adopted a new view on NuBits that is much more friendly and will make a better top post and hopefully repair some damage the last post may have created.

In any event, I did get some coding done today and will do more tomorrow.

Your talent on coding and writing is stunning. We need both.

Agree.  I think the perfect balance would be one blog post a week and the rest of time coding.  Those blog posts are extremely important  not only for showing your vision but also those post are paying dividends and help marketing tremendously. 

General Discussion / Re: Working on Code... Blog on Hold
« on: January 14, 2015, 04:41:13 pm »
+1 +1 +1

Maybe we could get Magic Leap to tattoo their next mini-elephant with a BitShares logo.


General Discussion / Re: NuBits is a Ponzi [BLOG POST]
« on: January 14, 2015, 02:04:15 am »

Of course things can always be positioned better. This is certainly no exception. And Given BM's history of missing the mark on positioning it is a shame he didn't reach out to some of the marketers before posting.  this could have been seen as a valuable contribution to the crypto world spun correctly.

I agree with this. This is the only thing missing in that blog. As is stands today none of the shortcoming of Nubits are fixed( they are planing to do it I know) . Was this necessary ? I guess it depend on your values and what you have to lose.  Knowing that a lot of people stand to loose money, what would you have done ?  Was that the best way to spell it out ? Definitively not, but to say nothing that would be wrong because if Nubits  are not fixing things quickly(not even sure that this is possible) people will lose money for sure !!!

Bitshares had critics too that's the way it is. So you answer back with proof that whatever is said is wrong. Well there is nothing technically wrong  with that blog !!!
Same goes with NXT vs Bitshares blog


General Discussion / Re: NuBits is a Ponzi [BLOG POST]
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:44:06 pm »
From reddit, "Because bytemaster ignored all the recent stuff nubits has been working on. It sucks because it makes it clear he's attacking them without being aware of what's going on."

This.  It makes the critique come off as disingenuous.  Same with the NXT post that didn't mention that some of the addresses were special (leased forging, et cetera).

Both posts would've been fine if they actually were up to date with what the communities are doing to respond to the problems mentioned (hint: their responses are probably still inadequate) but attacking these strawman versions of our competitors just looks really bad and desperate.

I thing he addressed this here :

General Discussion / Re: NuBits is a Ponzi [BLOG POST]
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:38:07 pm »
From reddit, "Because bytemaster ignored all the recent stuff nubits has been working on. It sucks because it makes it clear he's attacking them without being aware of what's going on."

I agree.  It felt to me like an attack on a straw man version of NuBits which existed back in september, but which has since been improved upon. For example, the addition of being able to burn NuBits supply in order to prevent the hyperinflationary collapse which is why Bytemaster called it a ponzi back in september.

It really makes it look like we are stuck in the past, bashing the previous version of a competitor which has been doing better than us.
Hmm are this implemented or in the pipeline ?

Any news ?

General Discussion / Re: Are returning payments in protocol 1.0 included?
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:07:39 pm »
In the past it was often discussed about the possibility to take the opportunity to make recurring payments available.

maybe something like that

i broadcast to the blockchain that i will pay x bitUSD every 15th in a month to merchant Alice as long i don't broadcast a chancel message

with this ability we could go to the recurring merchant sides. As long as i know, no other crypto tackles this huge market.

Absolutely this wold be a very strong selling point that for sure.

General Discussion / Re: Ads on bytemaster's blog
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:28:57 pm »
You need to take down the ads. Ads are good for monetizing when no other monetization method is more effective. Right now we have a few clear, valuable call-to-actions: get a bitshares account, buy bitshares, buy bitUSD, and sign up for the mailing list.

Anything else just distracts users away from these important goals, all while damaging the perceived value and credibility of you and bitshares on the whole.

I agree it makes the blog look unprofessional . There is not much traffic yet anyway, so no much money to be made.

General Discussion / Re: Merging Ethereum and BitShares
« on: January 09, 2015, 08:06:42 pm »
I don't mind they mention bitshares in a negative way,  let them  mention us where ever they can !!! Just be careful spelling/writing  it right guys ...  :)


both are accepted

PS @Newmine
a) I suggest you use our latest referral link ability
b)have you ever thought to campaign for  a  100% payrate delegate? (I am not joking )

Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D

60K for registration is a bit much. Besides, no one would vote for me for any reason. Ever.

In the meantime I am working on a "sharedrop" for those of us who didn't get millions handed to us.  ;)

Oh shit look we found Robin Hood !!!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 40