Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thul3

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 39
211
Quote
We are ready to cooperate with other developers.


Nice to see that statement  +5%


212
General Discussion / [Info] BBF paying based on fiat
« on: December 11, 2019, 10:03:06 am »
I just checked today the worker report of core team to see how it proceed and was a bit schocked.

First think i noticed is that BBF is paying invoices now in FULL fiat means they add depending on BTS price up to 62% more bitcny in the payout.

Second think which makes me a bit mad is the fact that now invoices are coming in which are all from previous months.Majority April-July.

You can say the late invoicing is costing the community a nice amount of extra BTS and the funds on "direct balance" for core team is decreasing quickly even not much have been done in the past 2 months according to some core team members.

How can you demand voters to vote appropiatly based on reports when you get on december big invoices for april-july and don't know what will come next ?
Are you supposed to guess ?

You demanded the community and expecially cn-vote to check the "low" spending and work done by core team and now we see these invoice coming for past work ?

How can someone evaluate somebodies work if he doesn't even know if the represented amount on report is even a final one or like now bigger invoices are being added for past work.

213
Whats the goal of adding these 2 pairs ?

I disagree adding now these 2 pairs instead of bitcny.

In the past days bitshares proofed to work great when market was going down and was one of the better performing coins in a downtrend HOWEVER it is having difficilties when moving up.
The issue is when the market is moving down it is being catched as supposed from the BTC/BTS USDT/BTS market but has no buy support when market is moving up.

Adding Bitcny/ BTC-USDT would be the needed support to also move quicker up in an uptrend and would release the pressure of current oversupply of bitcny


214
General Discussion / Re: CN-VOTE Statement on Market making contest
« on: December 09, 2019, 10:49:19 pm »
Quote
Second, We hope the organizers can join usdt/bitcny trading pairs in the contest, and reward not less than 20,000 BTS per day,  while appropriately reducing the reward amount of gateway assets.

Support it.
I would increase difficulty by 20% for current MM to lower payout by 20% .

Quote
Third, we hope that the future Market making contest will gradually increase the incentive for Bitassets . We believe that gateway assets should ultimately be self-financing and the future Market making contest should gradually be transformed into rewarding BTS's own Bitassets, which should be taken from the people and used by the people.
A side effect would be increase of issuer income of bitfiat

215
I'm also supporting for a long time to add bitcny-bitusd/USDT pair .At least it will increase the trading volume between CEX/DEX.

I would also support a small MM 5000 per day for the EUR/BTS pair to get it more populated.

216
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Decentralized 2019 Recap
« on: November 25, 2019, 10:12:02 am »
Did you get any input why companies are not using bitshares till now ?

I heard there was a lot of talk crypto now need to move to fully comply ?Is that correct ?

217
I'm for bitUSD/USDT reducing the votality risk of the liquidity maker massivly and still opens a direct gate between DEX and CEX.

218
I and most non foreign members have no problem to communicate in wechat channel for committee members

219
General Discussion / Re: consideration on buybacks and other hot issues
« on: October 30, 2019, 03:17:28 pm »
Bsip83 should not exist

I have checked bsip83. it is ass idea.

Bsip83 is trying to rape bts holders. 

Regardless of what you think about BSIP-83, an organization that calls itself "decentralized" cannot allow a single person to control the voting.

Wasn't it merged to early ?

220
Will you be able to participate actively in committes telegram group ?

221
Will you be able to participate actively in committes telegram group ?

222
Worker is ready and articles are fully paid.

I want to start with Forbes but am/was currently waiting for a positiv signal for altcoins so these articles would not be published without getting any significant results in a down trend

223
General Discussion / Re: Refferal program without LTM account
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:22:50 pm »
How would it be possible to QUICKLY achieve that people without a LTM account can also use our refferal program ?

Limiting it to LTM accounts makes that the refferal program is very unattractiv for normal users and more important gets a scammy touch .You need first to pay $100 to be able to advertise us is just bad.

Short term solution could be to have them contact someone from community (e.g. marketing@bitshares.org), tell them what and how they want to onboard and "we" provide them with an account for that.

Not really a solution you will have tons of small refferal participants where you can't give away LTM accounts to everyone.

224
General Discussion / Re: bitshares.exchange not pointing to DEX ?
« on: October 21, 2019, 11:20:31 am »
Because it wasn't paid for, yet ..


The domain was paid $10k if i remember correctly ?

Do you mean paid for pointing that domain via management panel to DEX ?

225
General Discussion / Refferal program without LTM account
« on: October 21, 2019, 07:25:49 am »
How would it be possible to QUICKLY achieve that people without a LTM account can also use our refferal program ?

Limiting it to LTM accounts makes that the refferal program is very unattractiv for normal users and more important gets a scammy touch .You need first to pay $100 to be able to advertise us is just bad.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 39