Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thul3

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24
1
I'm also supporting for a long time to add bitcny-bitusd/USDT pair .At least it will increase the trading volume between CEX/DEX.

I would also support a small MM 5000 per day for the EUR/BTS pair to get it more populated.

2
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Decentralized 2019 Recap
« on: November 25, 2019, 10:12:02 am »
Did you get any input why companies are not using bitshares till now ?

I heard there was a lot of talk crypto now need to move to fully comply ?Is that correct ?

3
I'm for bitUSD/USDT reducing the votality risk of the liquidity maker massivly and still opens a direct gate between DEX and CEX.

4
I and most non foreign members have no problem to communicate in wechat channel for committee members

5
General Discussion / Re: consideration on buybacks and other hot issues
« on: October 30, 2019, 03:17:28 pm »
Bsip83 should not exist

I have checked bsip83. it is ass idea.

Bsip83 is trying to rape bts holders. 

Regardless of what you think about BSIP-83, an organization that calls itself "decentralized" cannot allow a single person to control the voting.

Wasn't it merged to early ?

6
Will you be able to participate actively in committes telegram group ?

7
Will you be able to participate actively in committes telegram group ?

8
Worker is ready and articles are fully paid.

I want to start with Forbes but am/was currently waiting for a positiv signal for altcoins so these articles would not be published without getting any significant results in a down trend

9
General Discussion / Re: Refferal program without LTM account
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:22:50 pm »
How would it be possible to QUICKLY achieve that people without a LTM account can also use our refferal program ?

Limiting it to LTM accounts makes that the refferal program is very unattractiv for normal users and more important gets a scammy touch .You need first to pay $100 to be able to advertise us is just bad.

Short term solution could be to have them contact someone from community (e.g. [email protected]), tell them what and how they want to onboard and "we" provide them with an account for that.

Not really a solution you will have tons of small refferal participants where you can't give away LTM accounts to everyone.

10
General Discussion / Re: bitshares.exchange not pointing to DEX ?
« on: October 21, 2019, 11:20:31 am »
Because it wasn't paid for, yet ..


The domain was paid $10k if i remember correctly ?

Do you mean paid for pointing that domain via management panel to DEX ?

11
General Discussion / Refferal program without LTM account
« on: October 21, 2019, 07:25:49 am »
How would it be possible to QUICKLY achieve that people without a LTM account can also use our refferal program ?

Limiting it to LTM accounts makes that the refferal program is very unattractiv for normal users and more important gets a scammy touch .You need first to pay $100 to be able to advertise us is just bad.

12
They aren't be delisted now simply because the current mechanism IS better.

Maybe is better for people who went into debt and are intending to never pay pack and transfer all their loses to others, but not for the ecosystem. Maybe is better for people who is paying their bills with BitCNY to counterparties that are unaware of the peg being lost, but not for Bitshares in long run. 

Quote
* It does NOT keep/recover peg when BTS price is low enough.
* It's essentially automatic-GS, but not eliminates GS.

As far as Bts is used as collateral, no mechanism on this universe will work if Bts price is low enough. And no, this is not GS Because in GS, positions are taken all at once, thence the 'Global' in GS.

This is different, one position is liquidated at a time and its collateral is shared between all BitAsset holders, who will now have a little less of that asset.

Quote
Please think carefully, if you're talking about the idea proposed by Sahkan.
One scenario: assuming there are 1 million accounts holding 1 million bitUSD, when there is one debt position with 1K USD to be forcefully liquidated, whose bitUSD will be forcefully converted to BTS? Unless you mean all of them, technically it doesn't scale well (performance-wise) if considered fairness.

In your example, and assuming Sahkan idea, each of the BitUSD holder will have 0.001 BitUSD converted to BTS, they won't even notice. There would be no GS, No low collateral positions to worry about. It's a pretty neat idea.

You got really a bad understanding when writing something like that

13

1.Delisting of all bitassets outside of DEX
2.Dumping of BTS for other stable coins on CEX
3.Dead market on DEX ,starting from ZERO

Pure FUD. BitAssets situation cannot possibly worsen. As of today, they are pegged to nothing but debtors whim. Yet, no delisting has happened and none of your 3 points have occurred.

The proposed protocol recovers peg, eliminates GS, avoids hurting all debtors because it can be implemented to liquidate only the very lowest CR position once its CR falls below 1. What else do you want?

At least open your eyes to whom i'm replying

14
General Discussion / bitshares.exchange not pointing to DEX ?
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:03:11 am »
Why is bitshares.exchange not pointing to DEX as alternative domain ?

15
Quote
The debt would be replaced by Joe's collateral. So Joe's debt gets settled to Ana, his debt is 0, and Ana has 1000BTS instead of BitUSD. Joe gets to keep 500BTS that he was trading with + the profits he made on trading. That's in that scenario, if CEX is holding bitAssets and they get settled then yes they would have to swap funds for users, but that would be their problem to solve; DEX is build for DEX not for CEX.

1.Delisting of all bitassets outside of DEX
2.Dumping of BTS for other stable coins on CEX
3.Dead market on DEX ,starting from ZERO

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24