241
General Discussion / Re: Shorting Attack Protection?
« on: September 25, 2019, 06:05:19 pm »stop maintaining the peg when we can't afford to maintain it.
The cost to maintain the peg "in all conditions" is simply too big for us. Better to give up at some point.
Who is "we" and "us", and what cost is associated with feeding the external price?
The obvious point where we can't maintain the peg anymore is GS price, and we have already agreed to not feed below it.
Why do you want to feed above GS if real price is lower, personal interests aside?
Feeding an arbitrary price that has nothing to do with market conditions is (once again) a kick in the ass of every smartcoin holder.
Why you always take the side of smartcoin holders ?
People are blocking to fight price manipulation so why should debt holder suffer from it?
Also bitshares community is already so small and not growing do you want to lose the next group ?
A major smartcoin holder has already said his opinion and blocking any movement to protect against price manipulation with the words .....I give a fuck if debt holders will get rekkt.
So why should debt holders give a fuck if he is losing his pegg if its him blocking any protection against price manipulation.
Where is your solution or discussion for price manipulation btw ?
Why don't you get upset that bitshares debt holders get rekkt because of price feed manipulation ?
Haven't seen any active discussion from you there.....only always if its about protecting the smartcoin.