Does it mean Committee approved payment for LAtoken or even for the bigger shitty exchange IDCM ?
If yes i would like to know which committee member signed for it.
I made my reasoning quite clear last time. To iterate, I was made escrow by 3rd party and can only judge according to the conditions set forth in the worker proposal.
The bounty hunter played by those rules and not acknowledging that would discourage everyone involved.
Going forward, the community may need to consider evaluating worker proposals more stringently and demand clearer payout rules for bounties.
When I review proposals for the BBF, we always look at milestones that can be judged in clear metrics: Reached, Not Reached. Everything that leaves space for
interpretation causes drama (like here) afterwards - and I don't blame anyone for it. Let's learn a lessons (or two) and move on.