Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - isaacgoldbourne

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 22
76
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCs first gambling service now available!
« on: January 10, 2014, 10:58:21 pm »
24 bets remaining at 0% house edge

77
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Coaex - MemoryCoin Gold Exchange
« on: January 10, 2014, 10:55:47 pm »

Weren't coinabul found out to be scammers, who didn't have any stock and just waited until the next price rise to actually send anything. Which was often damaged or otherwise shoddy?

Thats why I think he should reveal his identity or send a vouch

True but they still have an online presence.

Yes, so do lots of scam sites, so what do you think about revealing your identity?

With a little bit of research, you can find my real name, my address and my phone number. It's been on the internet for a long time and it's already posted on my CMO thread.
You just need to learn where to look, I guess.
We want it directly from you, with some sort of proof. A gold exchange could handle thousands of dollars worth of transfers. I know I wouldn't do that with an anonymous stranger

78
MemoryCoin / Re: 100% Hash rate on one pool (again)
« on: January 10, 2014, 09:08:59 pm »
Short answer - no, not yet.

On the upside, we are not going to 51% the network or try other funny things. You may remember how btcguild was handling over half of bitcoin network and nothing special happened - for the same reason.
What if I hold a gun to your head?
It is very clear how exactly centralisation is bad, but it is (obviously) against our selfish interest to opensource the thing on the moment. It is also against the same selfish interest to harm the coin.
Its also against your selfish interest for me to not put a bullet in your brain. -- edit: to everyone interpreting this as a threat against him, 'I' is the perspective of someone wanting to perform an attack -- Even if you did it privately with other pools and arrange a part of their fees to go to you that would be considerably better than you having all the control.

I trust you, its just there are always ways of making you do things, or gaining access to your servers and doing things.

79
MemoryCoin / Re: 100% Hash rate on one pool (again)
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:53:59 pm »
Short answer - no, not yet.

On the upside, we are not going to 51% the network or try other funny things. You may remember how btcguild was handling over half of bitcoin network and nothing special happened - for the same reason.
What if I hold a gun to your head?

80
MemoryCoin / Re: The Pre-Mine Questions FreeTrade Won't Answer (Ongoing)
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:46:44 pm »
Well there is the whole issue of 40k coins from the MCF that he was using to vote for himself before we pointed that out.

[...]

both voted for you, newmine would've won otherwise.
There are a number of other votes where the deciding support is from the MCF funds.  It's obvious why you're not opposed though. 


You never mentioned that you regard the MCF funds voting for other officers to be a problem too. The discussion was about him voting for himself.
The people he voted for were chosen well.

For example at the beginning one large holder had voted himself into CHA and CMO. He used the funds to remove them from positions and replace with SeansOutpost (me) and Belltown.

81
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCs first gambling service now available!
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:45:13 pm »
Next 30 bets (as of 20:45 GMT) have 0% house edge

82
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Coaex - MemoryCoin Gold Exchange
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:36:44 pm »

Weren't coinabul found out to be scammers, who didn't have any stock and just waited until the next price rise to actually send anything. Which was often damaged or otherwise shoddy?

Thats why I think he should reveal his identity or send a vouch

True but they still have an online presence.

Yes, so do lots of scam sites, so what do you think about revealing your identity?

83
MemoryCoin / Re: Elections: Are they for the Coin or for Freetrade?
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:34:59 pm »
You want to know how much MMC coin freetrade hold on block 1, it's easy :

- He is holding the memorycoin 1.0 he mined (converted to MMC on block one) as everybody else !
This is usually private information and we generally didn't expect people to disclose it even coin dev.

- He is holding the memorycoin 1.0 he won from grant (converted to MMC on block one) as everybody who won grant !
This is public information, and you can find it in the blockchain from memorycoin 1.0

- He is holding the memorycoin 1.0 he won from MemoryCoinFondation grant (converted to MMC on block one) !
This is public information, and he should use it to fund some bounty for MMC, since he was just the manager of MemoryCoinFondation.

- He is holding Protoshare he mined  (converted 10% to MMC on block one) as everybody else !
This is usually private information and we generally didn't expect people to disclose it even coin dev.

So you have your answers, make search for the ones that are public, or ask Freetrade if you are too lazy and he is willing to help someone that is spreading FUD.
But don't expect the private info to be released, even thou you could grasp some on the blockchain if you take some time instead of trolling.

I wasn't going to post on this issue anymore, but GD, you guys just don't seem to see the forest through the trees.

MMC is based upon elected paid positions and being GPU resistant. This is what was to separate it from other alts.

GPU resistant failed, but that is not the issue I have.

The elections being based on the number of MMC is where I take issue.

FreeTrade has given himself a lot of coin from the pre-mine. MCF was to get the only non diluted cut of the pre-mine. MCF seems to have ~40k coins.  If you look at the genesis block you will see 2 addresses that received ~80k coins each. Since no PTS holder could've been holding 10x 80k coins as it was not possible, it is safe to say those coins went to memorycoin 1 contributors.  FreeTrade being the creator of memorycoin 1 most likely would grant himself the largest share of the contributors. 80,000 coins is more than 10% of the pre-mine alone.  If FreeTrade holds this coin it compromised the integrity of the elections from day 1. These holdings made FreeTrades election undisputed and guaranteed. Guaranteed until the GPU aspect failed and some large players stepped in. Had FreeTrades plan worked, the coin would have held off the GPU miners and FreeTrade's seat would have never been challenged as a CPU coin. This all the while the 2 positions he held kept paying more and more coin. (Yes, he only holds one now, most likely due to my original concerns and him trying to distance himself from the issue).

I think in the interest of the coin FreeTrade should only divulge what coin he was awarded from block 1. Or he should take his coin and step out of the position and not use his votes for a replacement.

This way you will all know what the elections are really about: are they for the Coin or are they for Freetrade's wallet?

Side note-

I thought it was quite interesting that bytemaster came forward seeming to distance himself from FreeTrade. Maybe bad blood, nonetheless interesting though.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2047.msg24598#msg24598
I'm not going to comment on the rest, as I don't thing 80,000 constitutes a big deal but GPU resistance did not fail. 4x performance increase (power wise) is VERY resistant. You can still mine and beat power costs on a CPU

84
MemoryCoin / 100% Hash rate on one pool (again)
« on: January 10, 2014, 06:24:01 am »
mmc.1ghash.com has almost 100% hash rate, for obvious reasons.

This is not very good for network security, we need to spread ourselves out. I would like to appeal to the admins of 1gh to opensource their GPU mining code so that other pools may use it, for the good of everyone elses coins. We cannot have you controlling this much hash rate - we need confidence now more than ever.

85
MemoryCoin / Re: The Pre-Mine Questions FreeTrade Won't Answer (Ongoing)
« on: January 10, 2014, 06:17:53 am »
Opening again.
FreeTrade I have stood up for you this far, and I will still regardless of your response.

Do you think it would be better to just reveal your current holdings and justify why you have so many or do you think that would just feed the trolls?

86
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Coaex - MemoryCoin Gold Exchange
« on: January 10, 2014, 05:50:43 am »
+1 MemoryCoin

Got an email from Nolan Gisser of Coinabul after my off-handed remark above.  He said they had been trying to reach me for a non-PO shipping address...

I'm not remembering seeing those months of emails, and neither is my gmail archive...but I get distracted easy, so I'll assume it was my fault. 

If Nolan signs up for an MMC account to join the community, replies to this thread and sends 1 MMC to the address in my forum signature below,

Then I'll send the 1 MMC back to him (plus transfer fees) and reply to his email with a non-PO shipping address.
Weren't coinabul found out to be scammers, who didn't have any stock and just waited until the next price rise to actually send anything. Which was often damaged or otherwise shoddy?

Thats why I think he should reveal his identity or send a vouch

87
MemoryCoin / Re: Value of MMC Going down
« on: January 10, 2014, 02:37:04 am »
I think MegaFarmer sold his coins today! The price went down so fast today because some idiot dumped 23k coins at once, it's like 250% of daily volume! What were you thinking? No wonder price would go down and you would get half of the value for the coins you've sold. BTW, price recovered already.

So the great thing about MemoryCoin is that if you sold you lost all of your votes. Now you can't impact the coin by your dumb voting for NewMine or spoiled addresses. Bye, bye, MegaFarmer! Our coin will be much stronger without you.

+1
+2 ^23000

88
MemoryCoin / Re: MMC sinking
« on: January 10, 2014, 12:09:33 am »
I think we need confidence, need time,believe leadership team.
+1 we need to realise what we have and support the coin

89
MemoryCoin / Re: [CHA][CMO] Proposal for Charity & Marketing
« on: January 09, 2014, 11:59:15 pm »
What charities have been selected?

As I stated above, I will think about it until the weekend and announce the nominations.

In addition I think I will only make one donation per week as the total weekly amount is not so big that its worth splitting up.
Don't sell it all at once please, we don't want the market crashed any more

90
MemoryCoin / Re: [CMO] Vote for stalemate
« on: January 09, 2014, 11:49:28 pm »
I want to see a done list not a to do list

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 22