I need to redo mine, assuming it ok to still change our public keys if we already sent them to you?

I believe I read that the last one submitted up to Feb 28th would be your final for the Gen Block.

A minor correction to bytemaster's post: the points shown beside the founder's ID is the points donated to get the Founder's ID (it's the dollar equivalent of the donation). The points bytemaster is talking about are "repute points" which are related to blockchain mining (which currently isn't enabled).

Ok but is there a way to determine how that equates to AGS? This is what I'm trying to do. I have a spreadsheet with all of my PTS to AGS holdings. I am trying to add any additional AGS positions I may have acquired through my three Founder ID's submitted prior to Dec, 24th. Is there a way to find that out? Thanks. (Sorry, maybe this is the wrong thread to ask...)

Alpha 3 release for Windows is available at http://invictus.io/bin/keyhotee_0.5.3.zip. I expect it will be at least a week before we put up another Windows alpha.

I've also updated the Keyhotee Founder ID registration server with names collected from web form (if you registered via the web form in last 12 hours, your registration might not be there). You can check if your Founder ID is correctly registered by running Keyhotee and verifying that "points" are displayed in the contact records for your Founder identity.

I downloaded and installed, created a few profiles for my various IDs with zero issues. I have a question about the points, long term are those going to be BTS or AGS?

Quote from: AdamBLevine on February 01, 2014, 09:24:43 pm

If I were you, I'd say "January 31st - Fixing Bugs today, dealing with a bad one in linux dependencies.  Looking like we're on schedule to have the latest version out in a week barring show-stopping bugs"

Thats it

Quote

Maybe you're thinking I mean "Blog post" - I do not.  I mean an update so when something goes awry we see it that day instead of at some arbitrary point in the future you decide to publicly talk about it.
Two sentences per day, I now have some idea what's happening and I know that the schedule has not changed.  It also fulfills what Bytemaster publicly committed to.

Ok, here's today's post: We're currently planning to release a blockchain version around Feb 28th. We'll also be releasing a Windows alpha 3 release soon and very probably an OSX release, pending positive feedback on the Linux 3 alpha release from yesterday.

I think this is a great start. I know that it's hard to provide daily updates in layman's terms with all the intricacy of programming, but I think that short updates like this will go a long way. I can see that you are trying to convey your progress in the most efficient method utilizing a tool that you are most likely in a good portion of your day. I can respect that thought process and using the status updates on GitHub, while does provide the most accurate metric for progress, it does not give the distilled down one or two sentences that I think many would like to see going forward. I know I like to receive the email alert that there is an update to this thread, and for many, that is the extent they are wanting to go to get an update. Digging around at another location and having to translate progress does not have much appeal for the non-programmer types. This is not a slight or jab at you directly or programmers, I'm just providing feedback, another point of view. I'm more of the IT Manager/Investor type so I can see both sides. I think you are doing a great job, appreciate the work you are doing, and very excited to see the final product when released.

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on January 30, 2014, 12:10:32 am

Quote from: old_pioner on January 29, 2014, 09:25:24 pm

too many idiotts on the pool, no profit.

That's not how it works. We need as many miners as we can get to solve as many blocks as possible. The more miners, the better that chance, it's a proportional payout of the work performed. Sure your payout might be smaller, but you would be getting more of them.

the point is you can only mine here with a (more) profitable gpu in comparison to scrypt
HD6990 - it makes 2540 cpm here  / 940 kH/s with scrypt / o.k. here
R9 290X - it makes 1350 cpm here / 850 kH/s with scypt / not o.k. here

BUT with the fast open-cl-miner my R9 290X makes 2530 cpm - this is o.k., but only at the beeeeeer-pool
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2598.0
hope NaN will implement other pool-support

when you mine at a smaller pool the luck-factor becomes bigger in comparison to mining at a greater pool(s)

Yes, it would be great to have standardized mining software, sort of like the cgminer/bfgminer in the BTC world. With PTS the majority of the good mining software is closed source and that is worrisome, i.e. no peer review. On the other hand, there does seem to be free market options at play. You sort of pick your miner based of the pool you want to support and how much tax you want to pay. (Pool tax + mining software dev tax)

Statistically variance balances out over time, weeks/month vs. hours/days with proportional payouts. You can see proof of this from BTC pools with PPLNS luck graphs. It's human nature to want faster rewards so they flock to what is paying out what seems like more on a daily basis. Over all, IF things were equal, i.e. the same mining software usable on all pools, it should average out over time. It's just math.

What is frustrating is this nebulous factoring you have to keep track of by gathering the yield not only from your total CPM, what you should actually be making with all your hardware by doing math, but the taxes levied from the pool and their supported mining software. The question then becomes where do I want to point my mining farm at based on the best pool/mining software combination after determining all the variables.

Ah good times, the life of a miner...  There is no set it and forget it, but that is why we do it right? Tinker and tweak every last drop of performance out of hardware for the greatest yield.

too many idiotts on the pool, no profit.

That's not how it works. We need as many miners as we can get to solve as many blocks as possible. The more miners, the better that chance, it's a proportional payout of the work performed. Sure your payout might be smaller, but you would be getting more of them. 

Are there any pool issues? I seem to be getting a lot of Failure and Reconnect messages.