Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - emailtooaj

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 39
91
Well we can just start tweeting stuff with that hashtag redirecting to beyondbitcoin's site
[emoji12]

92
Random Discussion / Re: The Foundation's Response to my Article
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:36:20 am »
Unfortunately,  not so surprising.  It was bound to rear it's ugly head at some point.
Maybe if Bitcoin had Worker Proposals like BitShares has implemented,  then the Bitcoin community could've enforced "accountability justice" for it's share holders.
Maybe you could PM some trust worthy Bitcoin devs that the BitShares block chain is hiring before all hell breaks loose over there  ;D





93
General Discussion / GPS to Crypto conversion
« on: January 01, 2016, 10:22:03 pm »
Sorry to make this long,  hastily put together post but thought it may interest someone out there!

This past holiday season I was having a discussion with my family regarding the current state of crypto (as I see it) and learning how it still boggle's their mind how a digital token can be perceived as "value" and thus become a useful replacement for our current economic system. 
We've all been in these situations before... till we're blue in the face... trying to explain the process and/or painting a picture of analogy's,  just so the laymen out there can easily grasp crypto concepts and how it all ties together. 
But during our discussion,  a thought entered my head that relates to the challenges Dan Robbles ( @ingenesist ) is trying to overcome with Curisome'. 
More specifically,  how he put's it...  "how do we get crypto to 'touch' the ground and meet real world, tangible assets?" like buildings, bridges, roads or just Real Estate in general. 

IMO there's some obvious answers to this question that could be, to some extent, quickly implemented.   

One possibility is using the current Deeds to Real Estate public records and attaching/assigning those deeds to a specific digital token and therefor be transferred or sold  easily to another entity/owner with the added benefit of using a global public blockchain. 
One hurdle (among with many others) is locating and/or informing the correct owner of that Deed and handing over the corresponding digital token assigned to that Deed. 
The other immediate problem (and I'm using this as very crude example) is that the world as a whole does not use a paper Deeding system. 
For example,  a tribe that's habitat-ed a certain area of land for 100's of years.  They don't use, or have a public/government recording system to process a paper deeded system allowing them to claim stake of their ownership/use of that area.   To some extent they have "human" squatter rights but still,  there's no proof of "ownership" for those inhabitants.

If this Deed to Crypto conversion could work and was implemented,  another issue arises would be the lack and/or difficulty to parcel out that said Real Estate. 
For example,  If you own 20 acres of land and you own a crypto token for that specific 20 acres and would like to subdivide it into twenty 1 acre lots allowing you to sell off those new parcels... how would that work? 
That one token would then have to be divided up into 20 separate units, which creates a whole slew of other steps and consideration in verifying the accuracy of that token along with matching subdivided land. Creating a bottleneck for the usefulness to easily transfer over to the new property holder.
With this previous thought/challenge of subdividing property running through my head,  it dawned on me...

What if a crypto token could be assigned not to paper deeds but to the GPS system???

Most people are familiar with GPS now-a-days but I'm not sure how in depth their knowledge actually reaches into the inner working/layout.  GPS, as some know, is basically a numbered grid system with varying degrees of precision.  GPS, just like Crypto currency can be broken down to "X" amount of decimal places.  Majority of Land Surveying equipment used today can obtain a precision of 6 decimal places all the way down to the 8th decimal place.  If you're wanting a quick read on GPS accuracy, here's a great thread with some charts and explanations...
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/8650/how-to-measure-the-accuracy-of-latitude-and-longitude/8674#8674

So imagine this... what if a cryto token was created and assigned/embedded to each specific GPS coordinate around the world with a consensus based on GPS accuracy of 6 decimal places (.11m or 4.33")? 
First thing that comes to mind is how many damn tokens would have to get created,  representing every individual GPS coordinate point based on a global grid with the corresponding scale of 4 inch by 4 inch?   I haven't done the math to find out, but it would be a hell of a lot!! 
Adding more to the complexity;  what if the grid not only went 2D around the surface of the earth but, also implementing it into 3D space? i.e. from 1 mile beneath the earth surface to 1 mile into the air?  That is a shit ton of reference points!!

Either way,  I think this could be a VERY intriguing way to put a Crytpo token to use.  If a system like this was place and implemented,  basically anything built upon or used within our physical space can be accounted for. 
Buildings, roads, houses, land,  waterways etc,  you name it... could now have an easier way to transfer ownership within that space, based on the GPS coordinate system and represented token on the block chain.

There is obviously WAY more details involved that can be discussed,  but I more or less just wanted to share this idea with you guys... even if it seems "way out there"!

I haven't come across anyone talking about this type of approach before... so this idea may be old news? 

IMO, very powerful none the less.

94
General Discussion / Re: [ANN - AMA] bitCash - Digital Money of the Future!
« on: December 20, 2015, 12:18:52 am »
@merivercap Thank you for this gift!

95
@ray you've done great work! I'm very intrigued and excited to see you're wanting to integrate Bitshares into your work.
When you ask how to "incorporate" into Bitshares, are you asking how to connect your work to the block chain via a UIA? Or are you asking for ideas/suggestions/philosophy of Bitshares to incorporate into your artwork?

96
LottoShares / Re: any update news?
« on: December 19, 2015, 05:35:21 pm »
@konelectric thank you for posting this info!

97
LottoShares / Re: any update news?
« on: December 19, 2015, 05:02:38 pm »
Not how I wanted the year to end but did anyone else get the email from LottoShares?
Was an email sent? If so, would you mind copying it here for other's to read please.

98
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Wanted: Email alerts
« on: December 19, 2015, 03:14:50 pm »
Can this idea be used to push a twitter "blockchain update summery"?

https://twitter.com/News_BitShares
That's not necessarily what I was referring to.... I was thinking more along the line of,

24hr total volume
Top 3 active assets
% of change in bts price vs daily/week/yr
Current active 2.0 version

You know....stuff like this to show that the exchange is actively working, not back office press/news.

Just my opinion :)




99
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Wanted: Email alerts
« on: December 17, 2015, 01:51:04 pm »
Can this idea be used to push a twitter "blockchain update summery"?

100
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Creative people! BRANDING FUN TIME
« on: December 12, 2015, 05:59:12 am »
Unity or UNIFY

101
General Discussion / Re: Show something good on the front page
« on: December 11, 2015, 08:15:15 pm »
+5 speedy, you've earned that name lol.
I literally thought the same thing when I went to down load the newest lite wallet earlier today!

102
General Discussion / Re: UIA Giveaway - BRICS
« on: December 10, 2015, 01:50:33 pm »
Do Not Do This ! :

Proof you can't use BRICKS to launder money

103
General Discussion / Re: UIA Giveaway - BRICS
« on: December 09, 2015, 03:33:14 pm »

104
General Discussion / Re: UIA Giveaway - BRICS
« on: December 09, 2015, 01:31:26 pm »
You've got my curiosity, count me in please

105
@onceuponatime I've always respected you and this proposal shows why.  I wish I had time to chime in on the conversation but, please re-think the multi sig threshold and increase it to something like 2 of 10 or 3 of 20.  When I was skimming through the proposal this was the one thing that I don't feel good about.
Otherwise, I'll vote on this knowing you've thoroughly thought this through and feel comfortable pushing this forward and putting your money on the line.

Can you tell me why it would be advantageous to do that? Since I plan on compensating my advisers (co-signatories) on the Maintenance Fund for their efforts and advice, increasing the number makes it both unwieldy to have meetings and expensive to run. What are the advantages?
My thinking was kind of what you've already mentioned, death, sickness, lost wallets or M.I.A persons.  I certainly agree with you when you say it'll be easier to maintain with fewer involved but, in the long term, I think having a few more names to call in the phone book as back ups will be beneficial should the need arise.

You're on my list should the need arise!   ;D
I'll be honored to help if called[emoji3]
Correct me if I'm wrong, am I getting this multi sig thing confused?
So if you designate 2 of 5 to complete the release of accumulated funds, are those 5 fixed, or are they variable?  I figure if 5 are assigned at creation that they could never change or be reassigned later on???
I'm on my phone...So hope this question makes sense.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 39