Something similar but with a private vrchat server would be pretty cool, people could branch off into separate groups to discuss matters instead of all communicating across the one video-conference channel. I'll be signing up for this though, good idea

when will it end, at 1.0?

Let's sell all the BTS to buy BTC, then BTC go up to 1M dollor, we will win.

Workers dumping bts is bad, but gamblers dumping bts is good? lol

Attention price feed publishers: Since the recent Bitshares blockchain halt, multiple price feed sources for the norns ceased publishing feeds due to getting stuck on a 503 error. Please reset your price feed scripts to begin feeding the Norns once again, thanks.

Seeking further price feed publishers & market participants 👍

Put in a request to translate both the Hertz & the Norns whitepapers from English to Chinese: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29573.msg335258#msg335258

I don't think it is not good.

So you support refund400k, I do not. The impact of refund400k on the future price of Bitshares is subjective, however it's had an undeniable negative effect on development and marketing contrary to ShirleyDD's latest newsletter.

I  think the holder has the right and ability to decide which worker is good for them.

I do not disagree that BTS holders have the right to decide their own voting slate.

Now i only can see many of you think the holder is foolish and short-sighted.

Voting for refund400k is short-sighted since it immediately sacrificed development, infrastructure, integration and marketing with long lasting impact with little prior outreach.

I don't think that all BTS holders are foolish, I'm simply explaining factual inaccuracies in ShirleyDD's newsletter which were irrefutably caused by refund400k.

The worker was voted in and out which was very normal, the holder didn't give a promise for that.

Sure, worker proposals provide highly unstable employment prospects for developers.

The holders may not have made promises, but individuals acting on behalf of integration & conference worker proposals certainly would have had to make promises on behalf of Bitshares once they were previously activated; not a good impression to pull out of multiple such contracts so abruptly.

The worker fund shouldn't only come from the reserve pool，it should also come from donation or other way.

Releasing reserve pool funds to worker proposals is like a donation from the network.

It's unlikely that private donations will fully replace reserve pool funding; the NA conference is fully cancelled by refund400k - donations won't matter.

Developers aren't going to work for free, they have bills and rent to pay so they will seek work elsewhere quite quickly.

All of our BTSers want better bitshares, whether it's the price of BTS or the future of bitshares.Because we are the real BTSers.Isn't it?

Without the current core development workers, how would you have personally resolved today's blockchain halt? How long would it have taken you to deploy a fix to the network?

Today's blockchain halt is clear evidence why funding dev workers is important; had the core worker no remaining funds the response may not have been so swift.