Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
这就是东西方两种不同的处世哲学。Interesting, our philosophy leads to a chain which survives and retains a marketcap, unlike yours it seems.
Isn't NBS a completely dead chain now? No blocks being produced anymore? Worth effectively $0
In that case, why would you include it for an asset snapshot? There's no legitimate consensus on that chain anymore, so it shouldn't be an airdrop target.
Just do it against BTS only. It sucks if you were effectively scammed by the NBS folk into giving up your BTS, but including that chain in the genesis distribution is pretty much making DFS dead on arrival tbh.
> 每八小时改变一次喂价
Seems quite infrequent, it would have been far cheaper to publish a feed 4 times a day on the bitshares blockchain for new private smartcoins than to run witness nodes for a new blockchain. DFS旨在打造公共稳定币和数字资产。
> 没有前缀“bit”。
https://defishares.org/gold.html
This page makes repeated usage of bitshares 'bitasset' terminology; calling them smartcoins or stablecoins would probably be better than to copy bitasset terminology. 主网和中文版没有前缀“bit”，英文版确实有。
> nbs链已死，已无交易所交易，市值仅供参考。
In that case, why would it deserve an airdrop? It should not be included in the airdrop at all due to its catastrophic failure. 与DFS开发进程有关
So the committee managed smartcoins will derive their settlement price from witnesses via a mandatory process during block production?
Every block will have mandatory price feed data then? 每八小时改变一次喂价
Aside from an increased frequency of price feeding, was there any reason these couldn't have existed as private smartcoins on the Bitshares blockchain? Gold pegged smartcoins are possible.
I see that nbs is included in the airdrop, coinmarketcap states its mcap is just $80k, compared to bts $3000k+ so the split would be 2.6% nbs 97.4% bts? What about also including other graphene chains in the airdrop like vaulta, hive, etc to drive more attention to the chain? nbs链已死，已无交易所交易，市值仅供参考。
Lastly, is it appropriate to use the terminology 'bitasset' when that's specifically Bitshares blockchain terminology for committee managed smartcoins? Perhaps new DFS specific terminology would be good for marketing purposes? 没有前缀“bit”。
2021年之后，市场调整期间，比特股社区也做过几次智能币规则的修改尝试，试图恢复智能币的信誉，完善承兑功能。典型的一次短暂而彻底失败的尝试即所谓的负反馈精准锚定。第二次试验就是现在还在采用的方案，废弃锁死最低喂价，恢复最初的喂价方法，把黑天鹅全局清算改为最低抵押率清算，此时BitUSD市场早已全局清算，仅仅能维持BitCNY市场的半死状态，和死了也差不多。
记得就在前几年，比特股创始人BM离开比特股多年之后，又回访过一次比特股论坛，只提了一个问题，询问比特股当时的喂价方案，之后就没有再出现过。我猜想，他肯定是没有得到满意的答案，当然既然他提出这个问题，那就是说他也没有想到和发现满意的答案。再就是如果他找到了满意的答案，他有可能想在EOS上做个抵押锚定币方面的项目。
You talk about smartcoins, but you really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins.
Anyone can create their own privatized bitasset, free from outside influence, free from past bitshares prices, and many people have; see "honest.cny", "hertz", "hero", and the norns like "urthr" "skuld", and "verthandi" for example.
Some of these privatized smartcoins have good operational records with marketing being the limiting factor. You can create these to reference any asset as long as you have price feed scripts for them, with your own smartcoin config & black swan recovery methods set, no need for secondary chains to try out new smartcoin ideas (other than the test network).
The competitors to smartcoins don't seem to transparently demonstrate sufficient backing collateral, so no wonder competing with them is tough when they're effectively just passing off user issued assets on other chains with no proof/withdrawal mechanisms as the real deal.
You bring up a lack of innovation, but you haven't mentioned the liquidity pools, the reference UI spotlight features, suez order sends order mechanics, the expansion of "black swan recovery methods" for improving smartcoin development, NFT apps/galleries, Airdrop tech, the introduction of credit offer lending on chain neither?
You bring up death & failure, yet the blockchain blocks reliably continue to be produced every 3 seconds regardless of bizarre CEX behaviour. Good riddance to Binance, their platform brought centralization and downwards price action.
I'd note that the clone coin you mention didn't to a proper genesis so isn't a true fork & has an mcap 40x smaller than BTS as of this post, not a good look. They even modified their core to be fully centralized, banning accounts from the chain: https://github.com/bitshares-cnvote/newbitshares-core/blob/29c316e376f1a0925537b2e6dd0bf226c0df99bf/libraries/chain/evaluator.cpp#L81
I'd probably say encouraging new gateways to open up, and/or encouraging existing gateways to support new tokens should be on the road to revival, back when BTS was top 10 there were more than we have now. That and more UI development.
EOS的DFS是试图利用比特币铭文融入比特币生态。这是一条比较可行的路线。
生态中缺乏原生资产，铭文的社区属性，不存在跑路问题，所以，一个铭文网关，可以在这个币圈社区中如鱼得水。为了取得成功，比特股需要采取哪些关键步骤
1. 强化核心团队：比特股需要组建一个稳定、专业的核心团队，包括技术、运营、市场等方面的人才。这个团队需要具备强大的执行力和凝聚力，以推动项目的持续发展。
2. 创新技术：比特股需要不断进行技术创新，以满足市场需求并保持竞争优势。这包括提高交易速度、增强安全性和可扩展性等方面。只有具备先进技术的比特股才能在竞争激烈的市场中立足。
3. 扩大社区支持：比特股需要积极发展社区，吸引更多的关注和支持。这可以通过社交媒体、线上线下活动等方式实现，同时要与用户保持密切互动，积极回应问题和反馈。
4. 强化合规性：随着加密货币市场的监管日益严格，比特股需要加强合规性建设，确保符合相关法律法规。这可以提升项目的信任度和可接受度，进而拓展市场份额。
5. 优化商业模式：比特股需要探索和优化可持续的商业模式，以实现长期盈利。这包括考虑收取交易手续费、推出优质产品和服务等方式，同时要保持与合作伙伴的良好关系。
总之，比特股要取得成功，需要不断进行创新和改进，加强团队建设、社区发展和合规性建设等方面的工作。同时，需要关注市场需求和用户反馈，优化商业模式，提升项目的竞争力和可持续发展能力。
