Quote from: 天籁 on October 23, 2018, 04:28:15 am

记得实施反馈前讨论时有几个共识，无论怎么反馈：1. 喂价不能低于市场价；2. 主要目的在于增加流动性；3. 提升BTS的市值排名。好像这几点现在都没有实现。

哪里有只能高不能低的共识，只能高不能低那还叫负反馈吗？前几天USDT崩盘被一些喂价程序解读为bitUSD溢价很高，造成一直提高喂价，现在是在回归正常。

Quote from: Thul3 on September 17, 2018, 06:40:15 pm

*To Mods.
I use my right for free speech and expressing myself in the way i like to.

Let me make this very clear to you and everyone else, right away. This forum is operated by the BitShares Blockchain Foundation and as such lives under Dutch law.
Your 'free speech' has been granted to you by your government, is limited to public law and does NOT apply in this forum which is privately operated.
Consequently, you can (and will be) lectured by means available to the operator, if they so chose, in case you continue personal rampage. Your tone is unacceptable not just for this community and the desire to cooperate to solve current issues (which constantly change) but is also unacceptable for the internet as a whole.

Provided that I dont speak for the BBF, i cannot give you an official warning, but rest assured that this is escalated to the proper authorities.

So, please stick to basic netiquette or go somewhere else.

Quote from: 天籁 on September 18, 2018, 03:29:34 pm

法理上讲，黑天鹅发生时的全局清算是对锚定资产抵押人和持有人双方的侵权行为。发生黑天鹅是双方多空博弈的结果，理应双方共同承担后果。如果黑天鹅发生后，市场回暖，全局清算造成抵押人伤害，如果市场继续下挫，全局清算加剧持有人伤害。

判定的标准有问题。

当真正的黑天鹅发生后，比如大于50%的债仓资不抵债了，抵押人持有人需要共同承担伤害，光全局清算抵押人是不合适的。