Quote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 am

Bitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the  BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .

How did you arrive at this conclusion?

What about if we learn from Dash?

Follow in Ronny Boesing and kenCode ,waiting bull market。 Dash XEM ETH 's community structureare is different from BTS ，because some rules change we lost the banker's trust 。
In the encrypted currency community ，why Bitshares   was considered a liar?
Now BTS is in 18 in  http://coinmarketcap.com/ .If more workers or BM back ,BTS will be in 30 .
We need all kinds of app ,such Ronny Boesing and kenCode's work .The apps are self financing.Then the  Bitshares ecosystem will be healthy.

好比一家公司需要一千万bitCNY,在无其它因素影响下（BTS无上涨预期），有谁会去生产这一千万bitCNY?

我认为他自己会去生产。或者委托网关。分秒之间就可以产生出来。

没有需求而生产bitcny，只是起到了一般的锁仓效果，另一半效果会被别人的强清而抵消。没有应用的情况下，强清割韭菜就是应用，最后，互相伤害。bitcny体量越大，强清规模越大，所有生产bitcny的人都可能面临损失，为了挽回损失，只好互相砸盘，以求低价买回，结果可以想象。

所以，大多数时间市场是理性的，有效的。走向市场的反面，要谨慎。

申请一个X万BTS的worker

这个方案就不要想了，归档吧。因为，牵扯面太广，拿出来讨论，只会引起分歧，如今天英国公投那般，严重破坏国家共识，引火烧身。
比较合适的做法是先获得巨蟹和比特时代的认可，或者将iou.cny做成流量最大的网关。然后，再供公众讨论。

 

 

Let me have a look ,does it solve any problem?increase trading volume?who will use it?