Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - inarizushi

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22
166
BM really seemed to enjoy the hangouts and sharing his thoughts on the forum. Could that new "communication strategy" really come from him, or are we really facing a Chinese whale threatening to dump and kill BitShares price if open communication continues ? This sucks on so many levels, but the worst part is that openness and freedom is what we're supposed to stand for.

167
General Discussion / Re: Should Bytemaster's Hangouts Continue? (POLL)
« on: February 26, 2015, 10:10:50 pm »
Said this in the other thread, but here is my reason:

Bytemaster's weekly hangouts is one of the things that sets this project apart in terms of transparency. I hope they will continue at least until we are clear of these early stages and we have a healthy base of users on the exchange.

Is there any reason for them not to continue? Has the PR manager made a ruling?
+5%

They have to continue, we need transparent information about what is going on, I have always found that the weekly hangouts are the best proof of transparency we have.

168
Français (French) / Re: Traduction de "101 Bitshares"
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:44:54 pm »
Bonne initiative, je me suis souvent dit que ce serait bien d'avoir un délégué en charge des traductions. Il y a plein d'autres choses à traduire aussi, je pense surtout aux sous-titres des principales vidéos et aux meilleurs articles du blog de Bytemaster.

Si jamais tu n'as personne, pour 1000 bitEUR, perso je serai partant pour le traduire aussi. Par contre, vu comme c'est la galère en ce moment, je pense que ça va être très difficile de trouver la somme requise.

169
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares now has a professional PR initiative
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:14:18 am »
What an incredibly bad idea... f*ck truth and openness, confidence don't come from those overrated virtues.

And if people react badly to THIS, what an awesome meta-fail : PR crisis by announcing that there won't be any PR crisis anymore. I am not sure that the Chinese style of communication will give much confidence to the western shareholders.

What will happen to the developer hangout mumble sessions ? Please don't tell me Daniel Larimer will be replaced by James.

170
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.6.1 Feedback
« on: February 18, 2015, 06:46:46 pm »
I'm on OSX, 4 Giga RAM, flash hard drive. It works quite well, even if it looks very very buggy : most of the time my second account doesn't appear, the transactions take much time to appear even after the blocks have synced.

Globally the wallet is way way better, it does what it is supposed to do, but the user experience remains quite bad, IMO.

There are many annoying things. If your short is fractioned in 10 different transactions, you'll have to cover each of them manually, paying a fee for each (probably not only a GUI problem, but that's very frustrating).

When one asks for a price by clicking on it, a slightly higher price is selected. That is psychologically very hard to swallow, even if the amount is negligible. You clicked on a price, you want to select THAT price, not a higher one.

So you change the price to what the sell order is... but, of course, you probably have some unappearing decimals so the buy doesn't happen. Quite unnerving !

Then, you ask for 1000, and you get 999.999. When you autoshort to yourself, you find yourself with a 0.001 short that someone will have to buy and pay the fee... and then you have to cover that 0.001 and pay the fee again. Argh. Obviously, fees are negligible, but psychologically, it is not, it feels like a hassle.

On my Mac, scrolling down is not sleek. It stops, to make the orders defile.

Clicking on a button doesn't exactly feel like it should feel, for example the "confirming" action after putting an order appears somewhere often out of the visual field. Maybe a pop-up would be better ?

Maybe we also need a confirming for cancelling actions ?


Good luck guys ! We have the best product, as soon as we have the perfect UI, traders will flock !

171
The user experience is quite bad, IMO. Even if the 0.6.1 wallet is way better, there are many annoying things. If your short is fractioned in 10 different transactions, you'll have to cover each of them manually, paying a fee for each. When one asks for a price by clicking on it, a slightly higher price is selected. You ask for 1000, you get 999.999. On my Mac, scrolling down is very buggy. Clicking on a button doesn't exactly feel like it should feel, for example the "confirming" action after putting an order should be a pop-up like thing rather than appearing where it does (and it can be easily missed). Graphs are erratic.

We need to have some user experience expert asking traders what they would need to really use the exchange.

172
BitAssets work great. By itself, this is a news powerful enough to shatter the financial world. And yet we continue sinking along with the Bitcoin vessel.

We are supposed to provide one of the most efficient trading exchange (aren't we ?). How do we get the traders to trade on our decentralized exchange ? The exchange UI is full of little annoying things, like clicking on a price and getting another price slightly higher, asking for 1000 and getting 999.999, micro orders whose fee is higher than the amount bought, etc... Shouldn't we ask a panel of traders to test our exchange, and then tell us what they expect and what they need to use it ?

We have a working technology enabling decentralized trading. Would a very usable, sleek UI do the job ?

173
General Discussion / Re: Cryptohedge and the bter hack
« on: February 16, 2015, 05:28:22 pm »
That's really sad.. I resold half of my CFSgold when I got the news, cause it may be hard to find affordable bitGold when cover time arrives  :(. I'll be happy to buy back when the situation clears

174
People who lost Bitcoins here are probably not willing to laugh along with the meme's guy. Not sure it's good marketing, I think that angry people hate receiving lessons.

175
klosure, on what grounds exactly is based your confidence that you are right ? Why do you claim to have a perfect insight of what the cryptocommunity wants ? Have you at least spoken to anyone from BTER ?

BTER was a nice centralized exchange, but it certainly isn't bitshares. They were BitShares friendly, but they also asked an ignominious 1% withdrawal fee. Bitshares needs a secure on/off ramp, like kraken.com, and then it must perfect its UI until my grandpa can use it. That's all we need. BTER has been hacked 2 times. Why in the world would we want to help BTER pay their debts ?

It's a blow to BitShares, but it also shows that we are right in insisting on decentralization. Why should we lose more than BTC here ? There is no reason to die from this, the market peg will hold and we'll just keep losing some weak hands... till, at last, some big investors will understand why BitShares is a good solution.

176
General Discussion / Re: Looking for Stuff to Do
« on: February 13, 2015, 08:00:18 am »
There is also the random shit in TASKFORCES which I'll be deleting soon.  The original reason it was created is for people who wanted to do random things like this.I thought I was going to find a home for the concept/content but it doesn't seem so.

Nullstreet is purely marketing, but the basic community needs a lot of minor things improved.  These are not marketing efforts.  The wiki falls in this category.

Great initiative, it's a shame it didn't work. Maybe we need a taskforce delegate, whose task is to find tasks doable by anybody, find people for doing the tasks, motivate them and tip them ? I spend so much time here without doing anything valuable for the system... well, I wrote an article in French and did some translation job, but I could probably be doing much more.

177
General Discussion / Re: BTS long term support
« on: February 12, 2015, 06:28:06 pm »
At this price it is possible to find new big investors, isn't it ? If it was possible to convince some big money with just promises and a whitepaper/proof of concept, isn't it possible to convince new big investors with all the amazing stuff already out there and the much more amazing features coming ?

178
General Discussion / Re: BTS long term support
« on: February 12, 2015, 08:56:09 am »
Sigh. How are shapeshift integration, metaexchange, cryptoedge, the much better 0.6.1 wallet, not short term good news ?

179
General Discussion / Re: BitShares article on coindesk
« on: February 05, 2015, 11:51:20 pm »
Overall I thought it was a good article, it explained some of the things we are trying to do.  (Which is a hard task).

The beginning seemed a bit confused, and confusing, and the title makes it seems like Bitshares has wronged people in some way, but at least it seems like a fair take on Bitshares, not pumping or trashing it.

IMO the suspicious title makes the article so much better ! "BitShares has some explaining to do... because its solutions to Bitcoin problems are very hard to understand". An unexpected conclusion, I feel like that's psychologically perfect to reach Bitcoin maximalists, who will click a link with such a title. Well, I don't know, but I loved it.

And it's a great timing for a positive article, people coming to see how BitShares is doing now will see some great news, not some Brian/merger controversies.

180
Delegates already have an unclear double role, adding proposal voting might be quite hard to swallow for many people.

Won't vote, +5% for toast proposal

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22