Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 68
691
General Discussion / Re: Delegates Please Publish Feeds More Often
« on: January 18, 2018, 08:55:48 pm »
Quote from: biophil on January 17, 2018, 03:33:41 pm
Quote from: Customminer on January 17, 2018, 11:09:53 am
Would it also not be worth increasing the max force settle volume per 24hrs? If it's set to 1% and someone has a margin call greater than 1%, perhaps the DEX couldn't clear the margin call fast enough?

I agree that max force settle volume is WAY too low. But I sort of assumed it didn't affect margin calls.

FWIW, the DEX doesn't clear margin calls -- the traders do. A possibly-bigger problem is the max short-squeeze ratio is only 110%, which means that margin calls are not very aggressive and traders don't have much incentive to buy into the margin call. I suppose USD will probably black-swan today because of it. A very serious problem is that Bitshares is too shorter-friendly, at the expense of people who hold the supposedly risk-free bitassets.

What would the effect of changing the max short-squeeze ratio be specifically? Would you desire it increase of decreased? All committee controlled assets use 110%

692
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh Block Explorer + MUSE now available
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:43:19 pm »
I too see 'Node replay in progress'.

Bear in mind there are the following alternative block explorers:
http://open-explorer.io/
http://bitshares-explorer.io/
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/

693
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:25:25 am »
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-71-activated-on-the-bitshares-network-2-more-witnesses-to-go

We're up to 5 of the 7 required witnesses now! Getting close to activation!

694
General Discussion / Re: Delegates Please Publish Feeds More Often
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:09:53 am »
Would it also not be worth increasing the max force settle volume per 24hrs? If it's set to 1% and someone has a margin call greater than 1%, perhaps the DEX couldn't clear the margin call fast enough?

695
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 16, 2018, 11:48:21 pm »
Updated the reference Hertz price feed script:
  • Updated rate calculation
  • Code cleanup - moving code around & changing comments.
https://github.com/BTS-CM/scripts/blob/master/hertz-feed.py

Updated the HUG REST API function:
  • Stop crashing due to non-publishing manually configured private price feed publishers.
  • Inherited the hertz-feed updated formulas.
  • Showing more info in the
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_hertz_value?api_key=123abc

696
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 16, 2018, 06:25:08 pm »

697
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10
« on: January 16, 2018, 02:34:51 pm »
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?

698
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares HUG REST API
« on: January 15, 2018, 07:05:23 pm »
Many updates to the HUG REST API since the original post. Most recently, a Bitshares testnet HUG REST API server was created! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/bitshares-testnet-hug-rest-api-server-now-online

699
General Discussion / Re: Creating new systems on graphene/bitshares2.0
« on: January 15, 2018, 04:48:45 pm »
Quote from: thor on January 15, 2018, 04:39:39 pm
Quote from: xeroc on January 15, 2018, 04:26:56 pm
If you want a steem-like blockchain, why don't you fork steem instead?

Hello Xeroc,
Steemit is a great product with market potential and community power. I just want dissect Bitshare 2.0 tech to use it for different use cases. At present stage, this is an effort to understand the core tool behind successful networks.

Thank You
Do you have the required technical skills to program such a large project? No offence.

700
Stakeholder Proposals / [Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10
« on: January 15, 2018, 03:17:29 pm »
I've been working on getting the HERTZ Algorithm Based Asset live on the Bitshares network recently, and ran into problems providing more than 10 private price feed publisher entities (Rather than witness|committee fed).

Would it be possible for the committee to increase the 'maximum_asset_feed_publishers' value from 10 to say 25?

As far as I'm aware, there's no risk associated with increasing this value, right?

Relevant links:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1025
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/bitshares-committee-request-increase-the-maximumassetfeedpublishers-value-from-10-to-25
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-42-activated-4-more-bitshares-witnesses-to-go-more-hertz-related-updates
https://sites.google.com/view/hertz-aba/

Thanks for your time,
CM.

701
General Discussion / Re: Creating new systems on graphene/bitshares2.0
« on: January 15, 2018, 02:59:49 pm »
http://docs.bitshares.org/

702
General Discussion / Re: How were the BTWTY tokens issued?
« on: January 13, 2018, 04:15:22 pm »
Quote from: kadawum on January 12, 2018, 09:59:42 pm
Thank you for the explanation. So, how can I determine for a specific asset if it was completely borrowed into existence or if some of the supply was issued by some centralized individual or organization?

It's a smartcoin, it's fundamentally impossible to centrally issue without backing collateral. It can only be shorted into existence with 200% collateral.

Quote from: kadawum on January 12, 2018, 09:59:42 pm
Furthermore, in the BTWTY page (https://wallet.bitshares.org/#/asset/BTWTY) the asset is listed with the permission "ISSUER MAY TRANSFER ASSET BACK TO HIMSELF". So it seems that the individual who controls the issuing account (in this case estefantt) is able to just transfer the assets back to himself as he wishes. Is there a good reason that this permission flag is enabled? It seems that most other assets (HERO, BitUSD, ...) have this flag enabled as well. In the case of BitUSD the issuer is the committee-account, so that I assume that it is much harder to make use of this permission. But in the case of BTWTY and HERO, it seems that it makes the asset completely centralized and controllable by the one individual who is listed as issuer. Am I missing something here as well? Thank you.

The Hertz algorithm based asset has surrendered such permissions, you're right that this is a troubling flag to not have permanently disabled.

703
General Discussion / Re: Scorum (SCR) Sports Media Platform built on the Graphene Framework
« on: January 13, 2018, 04:13:38 pm »
I read it as 'Scrotum' instead of 'Scorum' at first glance, lol!

Only accepting BTC & ETH, No Bitshares network assets? No sharedrop neither? :(

704
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Acquire Bitshares.com Domain - Cryptonomex
« on: January 13, 2018, 03:58:16 pm »
Quote from: pc on January 11, 2018, 03:02:17 pm
I'd support the effort in principle, however with Cryptonomex no longer being "the company behind bitshares" ownership of the domain should be transferred to the BitShares Foundation.
I agree, however the Bitshares Foundation equally doesn't answer directly to BTS holders, right?

705
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Blockchain Academy - portal to market BitShares
« on: January 13, 2018, 02:08:41 pm »
Quote from: Brekyrself on January 09, 2018, 06:50:08 am
What's the reason people are not voting for this?
Perhaps a lack of exposure? Worth jumping on the bitshares hangouts to promote it..

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 68

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 23 queries.