1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: April 05, 2019, 12:46:03 pm »
But I see you haven't voted yet.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
3
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: April 05, 2019, 09:29:07 am »As promised last week, I am now starting to rotate my votes. Consequently, I will remove my vote from workers even though I technically support them to give room for other workers.hi xeroc,do you support bisp59(Reduce MCR to 1.6)?
The list of workers I (generally support):
- 201902-bitshares-core
- 201902-reference-faucet
- 201902-infrastructure
- 201902-bitshares-ui
- 201810-bitshares-org
- 201901-legal-representative
- 201902-marketing-interviews-articles-and-visibility
- 2018-09-rossul-ui
- 201903-atomic-cross-chain-swaps
- 201812 Bitshares Mobile App [this one should be fully funded already - @team, please update us]
- 201903-bitshares.org-exotic-infrastructure
- DEXBot WP2 - Liquidity for the DEX
Poll workers I keep supporting:
- Poll - BSIP42 - NO adjustment to price feed
- Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05
- Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02 (to replace the vorker above)
- Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MCR of bitCNY to 1.6
- Poll-BSIP58-Global Settlement Protection on bitCNY
- Poll-BSIP58-Global Settlement Protection on bitUSD
The ones I vote for in this period:
- 201902-bitshares-core
- 201902-infrastructure
- 201810-bitshares-org
- 201902-marketing-interviews-articles-and-visibility
- 201903-atomic-cross-chain-swaps
- 201903-bitshares.org-exotic-infrastructure
- DEXBot WP2 - Liquidity for the DEX
- 2018-09-rossul-ui(e.g. every odd worker in the list above)
edit: added more workers that are in need for funding more desperately
4
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 04, 2019, 12:18:01 am »
Baozi's votes have shrunk
5
General Discussion / Re: Add "close long" feature?
« on: April 03, 2019, 09:58:00 am »
Good idea
Support it fully.
Support it fully.
6
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 03, 2019, 09:52:09 am »It's a bad idea to introduce cex. I hope you can communicate with bitcrab and work together to solve the problem.You are aware that it was your past actions (to get things done your way) which created the whale bhaozi and made tons of people leave bitshares?yes, it's BSIP18 and BSIP42 make me the whales.
And I have warnning many times, these two changes are totally unreasonable.
I close BTSBots because of BSIP18 which make SILVER's price 3 times.
I got many profit from these two BSIP just prove the system mistake.QuoteWould it even be possible ?Alt could split his voting power to diffrent accounts or even diffrent people supporting his views and they would instantly get top proxies.In fact I have wait a long time to give part of my vote power to another one who is trusted, but I can't find it from the top proxy currently.
If you are interesting to be the proxy, give me the account name, I'm glad to set you as my proxy.
7
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 03, 2019, 09:04:03 am »Please……You are aware that it was your past actions (to get things done your way) which created the whale bhaozi and made tons of people leave bitshares?yes, it's BSIP18 and BSIP42 make me the whales.
And I have warnning many times, these two changes are totally unreasonable.
I close BTSBots because of BSIP18 which make SILVER's price 3 times.
I got many profit from these two BSIP just prove the system mistake.QuoteWould it even be possible ?Alt could split his voting power to diffrent accounts or even diffrent people supporting his views and they would instantly get top proxies.In fact I have wait a long time to give part of my vote power to another one who is trusted, but I can't find it from the top proxy currently.
If you are interesting to be the proxy, give me the account name, I'm glad to set you as my proxy.
8
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 03, 2019, 09:03:24 am »You are aware that it was your past actions (to get things done your way) which created the whale bhaozi and made tons of people leave bitshares?yes, it's BSIP18 and BSIP42 make me the whales.
And I have warnning many times, these two changes are totally unreasonable.
I close BTSBots because of BSIP18 which make SILVER's price 3 times.
I got many profit from these two BSIP just prove the system mistake.QuoteWould it even be possible ?Alt could split his voting power to diffrent accounts or even diffrent people supporting his views and they would instantly get top proxies.In fact I have wait a long time to give part of my vote power to another one who is trusted, but I can't find it from the top proxy currently.
If you are interesting to be the proxy, give me the account name, I'm glad to set you as my proxy.
Bitcrab's motivation is good. You should work with Bitcrab to promote the evolution of bts.
9
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 03, 2019, 08:06:02 am »Touched me……Would alt be voting in your favour i highly doubt you would open that thread.
right, if alt voting in MCR change I will not open this thread.
because what I care most is how to get things done, how to push BTS' evolution.
10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP58:Global Settlement Protection Through Price Feeding on bitUSD
« on: April 03, 2019, 04:08:47 am »
11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] OpenSource Bitshares Mobile App Proposal
« on: March 31, 2019, 03:17:26 am »
Great
13
Technical Support / Re: [pyBitShares] Release 0.3.0
« on: March 29, 2019, 11:45:21 am »Hello everyone,Founded by worker is the best choice,i think. You are my idol,by the way.
just so you guys don't miss it, python-bitshares version 0.3.0 has just been tagged.
This release took quite some efforts as it lays out the foundation to share more code with other blockchain.
Additionally, new operations (including HTLC) have been added and (shitton of) bugs found by the community
have been resolved.
At this stage, I would like to discuss with the community, how to continue with this project as I cannot promise to find
the time to work on this as actively as I would like to. Should we go for a bounty based development setup (funded by
a worker), or rather look for funding from existing projects that use pybitshares (like dexbot) and have their team
also work on pybitshares more actively?
Ultimately, I would very much love to see this grow (even more) into a community project with more contributions
being merged in. As you can see from (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitshares/python-bitshares/master/AUTHORS),
there are already some 20 contributors in the repo. Let's make this 40, please!
14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MCR of bitCNY to 1.6
« on: March 29, 2019, 08:05:38 am »I will not support change MCR to 1.6 because it's very hard to decide which one is better.Please support this change
this can't contribute too much to encourage supply, but increase big unstable to the market.
and it's even more bad in the future when you decide to increase MCR like from 1.6 to 1.7
15
中文 (Chinese) / Re: ROSSUL 和石墨烯实验室团队全面的比特股(BitShares) 用户体验/用户界面更新
« on: March 28, 2019, 12:11:48 am »朋友们！不是已经投票通过了吗？
今天我们很高兴为您提供一份不寻常的进度报告。尽管我们的工作提案的最后一笔重大支付是在2月18日完成的，但新BitShares应用程序的工作并未停止，产品已开始發展出具体的形式。下面您可以找到上一次报告发布以来我们達成的主要成果列表，但今天更新的目的当然是连接到BitShares测试网络的应用程序功能版本的链接！
http://bitshares-ui-master.test.graphenelab.io
那么，到目前为止我们所取得的成就：
- 帐户授权
- 仪表板，带有工作单创建表单和传输，显示檔案圖表，打开订单圖表（成对图表和趋势是存根）
- 包含订单显示的交换页面，用于创建买/卖/代幣订单的表单，历史记录和选择（图表已禁用）
- 探索页面（没有交互式，但有当前数据）
- 你和其他的用戶數據（没有黑名单）
- 设置页面，包含更改节点和访问权限的选项
- 联系页面
- 交换屏幕中的图表
- 报到
我们目前正在做的工作：
- 表决
- 黑名单
- 创造一个預算項目
关于界面原型设计的工作同时进行，我们很高兴与您分享在移动裝置中新的界面设计：
平板电脑 - https://invis.io/JBQQ3M12A7E
电话 - https://invis.io/5TQJ19JFW6H
不幸的是，在大部分的專案工作时间里我们仍然面臨一个障碍：我们没有得到许多领先的BitShares利益相关者的支持，而且我们的预算非常有限。
我们懇切希望那些尚未投票赞成我们的商业计划书的用戶能支持我們。每个用戶的声音都很重要！
