31
General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to prevent bad debt (black swan)
« Last post by armin on October 19, 2018, 06:06:33 pm »this is an even worse solution for shorters than the current one
Recent Posts
32
中文(Chinese) / Re: 有人能大概说下BTS原子交易在大会上咋说的么？
« Last post by btspp on October 19, 2018, 03:06:58 pm »HTLC实现超级简单，但要应用起来很难。好多钱包和交易所都不支持htlc，转账都是直接到账。
33
中文(Chinese) / Re: 内盘首款BTS价格竞猜游戏，理论可行性讨论
« Last post by btspp on October 19, 2018, 02:58:01 pm »未来连续几个区块的区块ID作为随机种子即可。
34
中文(Chinese) / Re: stan提出的闪电网络解决方案在技术实现上是否可行？难点在哪？
« Last post by btspp on October 19, 2018, 02:46:06 pm »不是HTLC hash时间锁合约那个原子交换？
35
General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to handle bad debt (black swan)
« Last post by bench on October 19, 2018, 02:40:32 pm »The account with collateral under 1 gets a negative entry for BTS and will be balanced to 0, when price of BTS is high enough again?
Isolating the problem is the best way dealing with this problem, but we need to make the barrier as high as needed to not get a black swan.
This fits better in a different topic:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27315.0
Isolating the problem is the best way dealing with this problem, but we need to make the barrier as high as needed to not get a black swan.
This fits better in a different topic:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27315.0
36
General Discussion / New mechanism to prevent bad debt (black swan)
« Last post by bench on October 19, 2018, 02:21:30 pm »In this topic I want to discuss different ideas to prevent bad debt.
One idea was to handle margin positions depending on the collateral ratio.
Creating three groups for different ratios:
- 1.75>x>1.5: normal call price
- 1.5>x>1.25: reduced call price
- 1.25>x>1.00: sell to highest call order and reduce liquidity
What do you think ?
One idea was to handle margin positions depending on the collateral ratio.
Creating three groups for different ratios:
- 1.75>x>1.5: normal call price
- 1.5>x>1.25: reduced call price
- 1.25>x>1.00: sell to highest call order and reduce liquidity
What do you think ?
37
General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to handle bad debt (black swan)
« Last post by Customminer on October 19, 2018, 01:24:04 pm »I like the idea of not performing a global settlement if a very small amount is under-collateralized, maintaining the normal function of the bitasset, but it does feel like the individual debt holder in said position is getting off lightly given that they defaulted on their loan.
It'd be great if their account was partially nerfed until their under-collateralized position is bought off the market, like temp-disabling LTM (inflating their BTS DEX fees), perhaps disabling borrowing the same bitasset or even highlighting their account as a known "bad debt holder" within in the BTS DEX UI (similar to known-scammer account warnings)?
Do you not think that global settlement as it's currently implemented should trigger if a majority of a bitasset's supply have defaulted on their loans though? Or should the proposed mechanism operate for the full 100% of supply?
It'd be great if their account was partially nerfed until their under-collateralized position is bought off the market, like temp-disabling LTM (inflating their BTS DEX fees), perhaps disabling borrowing the same bitasset or even highlighting their account as a known "bad debt holder" within in the BTS DEX UI (similar to known-scammer account warnings)?
Do you not think that global settlement as it's currently implemented should trigger if a majority of a bitasset's supply have defaulted on their loans though? Or should the proposed mechanism operate for the full 100% of supply?
38
中文(Chinese) / Re: 【讨论】坏账处理（黑天鹅）规则改进思路
« Last post by gmgogo on October 19, 2018, 01:19:59 pm »当然是收进池子里卖！
不论是池子里还是私人账户上，其实系统都已经承受了此次抵押资不抵债带来的不良影响。
个人觉得，系统不仅应该将抵押资产收进池子里，还应该抽取系统通过手续费或者其他可能的盈利来尽快消除坏账，而系统既然帮助消除了坏账，自然也应该享受未来可能上涨而高价卖出的利润。
即使系统不通过以往的利润消除坏账，也是应该收到池子里。资不抵债了，还不收取抵押物？那还算是抵押吗？
不论是池子里还是私人账户上，其实系统都已经承受了此次抵押资不抵债带来的不良影响。
个人觉得，系统不仅应该将抵押资产收进池子里，还应该抽取系统通过手续费或者其他可能的盈利来尽快消除坏账，而系统既然帮助消除了坏账，自然也应该享受未来可能上涨而高价卖出的利润。
即使系统不通过以往的利润消除坏账，也是应该收到池子里。资不抵债了，还不收取抵押物？那还算是抵押吗？
39
General Discussion / Purchase reasonable sldnfl no preparation
« Last post by PatrickMuch on October 19, 2018, 01:14:55 pm »cialis for women contraindication
viagra without a doctor prescription
cialis blogs
<a href="http://viagrawithoutdoctorpharm.com">viagra no prescription
</a> - cialis costco who is online
cialis and alcohol consumption forum software
viagra without a doctor prescription
cialis blogs
<a href="http://viagrawithoutdoctorpharm.com">viagra no prescription
</a> - cialis costco who is online
cialis and alcohol consumption forum software
40
General Discussion / Order miserly sldnfl no remedy
« Last post by Alberthak on October 19, 2018, 12:14:04 pm »cialis versus viagra users opinion
viagra without prescription
cialis 10 mg 4 tablet topics
<a href="http://viagrawithoutdoctorpharm.com">viagra without a doctor prescription
</a> - effectiveness viagraa versus cialis
cialis price users browsing this forum
viagra without prescription
cialis 10 mg 4 tablet topics
<a href="http://viagrawithoutdoctorpharm.com">viagra without a doctor prescription
</a> - effectiveness viagraa versus cialis
cialis price users browsing this forum