Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - solaaire

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12
121
Anyway, here are some guidelines that might help you make better announcements in the future.

1) When you make an important announcement, don't obfuscate it in a random ass thread
2) If you're going to make an announcement, be concise and thorough on your first attempt. This is the post the most people are going to see by a wide margin. make it count
3) Please, please, please make an effort to differentiate when you're posting on behalf of Invictus and when you're posting a personal opinion. Sometimes you qualify your sentences with "We" and "In my opinion" but I hope you can understand how you swapping back and forth between these 'personas' under the same account can make it difficult to distinguish between the two. I suggest a new handle for when you wanna play Invictus

I really hope the best for this project but I think your expectations of the community are a little unreal. I still have faith in y’all but damn, you guys are still awful at managing user expectations and almost equally as bad at communicating the value of your innovations to users/investors. Why is it that nearly every innovation you guys have implemented so far ends up raising the value of PTS/AGS, and yet y’all still have to fight tooth and nail to convince users and investors that you guys aren’t scamming them with each new idea…  Seriously, what does it say about the state of Invictus’ PR when loyal users that have already invested tens of thousands of dollars into the ecosystem are shitting bricks because Stan failed to effectively communicate the latest value proposition?

122
After failing to communicate the value of his idea the BTS community in his 40+ posts (conservative estimate) spread across two stickied topics, Stan, relentless in his efforts, creates a third topic. This third topic outlines a straightforward list of proposals based on community consensus that eliminates many of the previous complaints from shareholders. A much better attempt, but sorry Stan, im taking marks off since you used space in original post as a soap box to express your opinion on the current proposal. All things considered, third sticky wins by a longshot.

To be blunt Stan, I totally agree with you that many of your posts are straight up convoluted and fail to convey what you are actually trying to communicate. I'm sure ill come off this high horse looking like an asshole but despite your best intentions, many of your posts end up fueling the FUD through confusion. I'm not saying explaining many these concepts is easy... But if it consistently takes you several posts to properly convey your thoughts on a message board, a medium where you have all the time in the world to triple check your statements for clarity... I sincerely suggest letting someone else handle announcements.

Unfortunately this doesn't seem likely, given Bytemaster is busy in the lab (dont worry, he earns an honorable mention in this topic for the classic "GET YOUR BTSX WALLET HERE" troll thread) and the rest of the newly dubbed marketing crew seems to be preoccupied with whatever it is that they do. (They do things, right?)

123
I also enjoyed the part of Stan's original post where he took a potshot at PTS miners who support an infrastructure critical to the bitshares operations at this time. I realize that PoW is not an ideal solution, but asserting that a miners work is worthless aka "digging holes and filling them up" is absolutely 100% incorrect considering we need miners on the PTS network until DPOS has successfully been implemented. Please, please, PLEASE consider how some of these statements might come across as arrogant to some shareholders, myself included.

Well, we're off to a splendid start already. Stan spends the next 4 pages of this topic handwaving concerns for the most part. Stan then creates a new topic that provides a bit more clarity, and with a relevant title to boot! Within this thread, Stan laments that "...we usually have to explain all our new ideas several different ways before everyone gets comfortable with it." Later in this same topic, Stan thanks someone and comments, "It's nice to have somebody who can explain things better than my often convoluted attempts!" This thread is definitely an improvement over the first, Stan is more engaged with the community in this thread, but after 15 pages the topic isn’t turning out as planned, yet again. These are not assuring words coming from the guy running PR at the moment

124
Unfortunately, Stan then went on to claim that this exciting (but completely unproven) DPOS tech will realize a one-time cash infusion of around 7 figures, but according to the original post, Invictus had apparently already decided that all of this money is theirs to spend on marketing as they saw fit. Again, this original UNCUT PTS2 announcement has since been edited out of existence. Could this retracted marketing fund have been successful? Who knows. All I know is that the feel-good marketing jargon found in the post provided zero insight as to how these solicited funds would actually be used. Hand waving and listing off some DACs does not reassure me in the slightest.

Perhaps if the marketing team had a proven track record, the conversation might have played out differently as well, but as it stands we hardly hear a peep from any of em’ about a damn thing. Did you truly expect that a marketing fund of close to one million dollars would be granted by the community to a team of marketers that have spent the last few months doing what? Vacationing to bitcoin conferences? Oh and they managed to spend 22 grand on a website that lasted all of 4 days. And the only thing they have in the pipeline is what? Another website? And you literally expected the community to be gung-ho, bursting at the seams with suggestions about how the marketing team should spend these funds… UHHHH isn’t figuring that sort of stuff out their job? So Stan, tell me what marketing project you’ve contributed to that have seen a 10x ROI? Sorry, PTS and AGS don’t count. While you’re at it, would you mind telling me what used sales car lot you’re employed at?

125
Now that the context is out of the way (i tried to stay objective) its time for THE CALLOUT

Stan, I’ve gotta ask man, why in the fuck did you choose to bury the PTS DPOS announcement in a thread titled “Rest in Peace, DA”??????? The title gives absolutely zero indication that there is any investment information to be found within the thread.  The first paragraph makes an esoteric forum reference and tops it off with a meme. This. This is the thread that you chose to post insider information about PTS2 a full 24 hours before you finally took pity and made a topic with a relevant title for the rest of us. From your posts it is obvious that you expected these announcement to raise the value of PTS, yet you decided to share this information in an obscure topic so that “you guys would know first”, whatever that means. What in the actual fuck. 

Anyway, once you skip past doctor evil, the first real content of Stan's first post touts moving PTS from PoW to DPOS as a solid play. Admittedly, I agree with this move and I am very excited to see this development play out

126
SEE POSTS 2+ IF YOU WANNA SKIP STRAIGHT TO THE FIRST DEGREE BURNS

Here's a cliffnotes version for those who may have missed the original PTS to PTS2 announcement threads:

A couple of days ago it was announced that the bitshares dev team is planning on upgrading bitshares PTS after bitshares XT is completed and released

This news was stealth announced in a cryptic topic titled "Rest in Peace, DA" found on the marketing board.  The topic, created by user Stan, intended to deliver great news to #bitsharesbelievers: Invictus is planning to upgrade the PTS network (via a soft-fork) by utilizing the DPOS tech which they have been developing over the past few months. In addition, it was announced that when this upgrade takes place, there will be around ~$1,000,000 of "windfall" money, and that this extra capital would go in a marketing slush fund controlled by Invictus

As I lurked through thread, some users appeared to like the idea. The current PTS PoW algo has some sustainability issues that are alleviated by upgrading to DPOS. Others observed that by allocating the remaining PTS to themselves, Invictus would breach the established social contract.
Stan continued to post in the thread, elaborating upon and holding his original position: investors should like this announcement because Invictus is in the best position to spend the funds wisely and thus maximize shareholder return.

After a total of 3 topics and 300 posts over the last couple of days, the first two topics discussing this issue have been closed, and all posts Stan made referencing the original million dollar marketing fund have been edited out of existence and can no longer be found. The most recent topic demotes the previous PTS DPOS upgrade announcement to a "proposal", and drops any talk of what to do with the left over PTS, instead deferring the decision to (community?) consensus at a later date.

I do not bring up the fact that Stan edited away the original announcement to cast suspicion on him. I do it because the original post Stan made regarding this (now defunct) marketing fund was more than a little half baked, and responsible for a lot of the FUD surrounding the PTS PoW to DPOS transition. Also it serves as a perfect example of how to confuse and alienate your user base.

127
General Discussion / Re: What do you guys think about Darkcoin?
« on: May 23, 2014, 01:52:54 pm »

The truth is the only thing you need for privacy is to never reuse the same key. Satoshi put it in the original whitepaper and all this other stuff is unnecessary if you design the coin by default not to allow bad habits. You design fault tolerance into the coin itself, similar to how you have bathroom doors which close themselves and open themselves so people don't have to touch them after washing their hands.
I feel you here, good design can go a long way
Oh yeah and DRK is Proof of Work so that means it's obsolete at launch. Maybe if they were to upgrade to Proof of Stake I would give it's developer more credit.

i dont know if i agree with this. PoW attracts miners which seems to help kickstart crypto markets in their infancy. also bitbadger pointed out that the development team is pretty active. PoW probably won't be around forever but a good development team could probably migrate the existing blockchain to a more sustainable consensus algorithm, similar to how pts is migrating to pts2

128
General Discussion / Re: BitShares PTS2 - Community Input Thread
« on: May 21, 2014, 11:21:10 am »
sounds like a practical solution. cant wait to see dpos in action! +5% +5% +5%

129
Meta / Re: Hot Tips, Market Info & Coin News
« on: May 21, 2014, 07:55:50 am »
 +5%

130
General Discussion / Re: How to join the News letter.
« on: May 21, 2014, 02:58:01 am »
welcome to the forum!

as far as i know, the newsletter is on hiatus for now, or at least no longer a monthly publication. The last one was mailed out in March, here's a link: http://bit.ly/1jBzjh9

131
Lots of great insight in this thread - the whole financial system is a bit of a mess eh? I have heard the term petrodollar before but I didn't realize how important it was in terms of granting the US enormous financial power internationally


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

132
Best of luck dom, please drop a line here when it's ready to go!

Also bm I think delulo has a point... That last comment was pretty abrasive and comes off as bitter and resentful, even if it is factually sound


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

133
also thank you for sharing donkeypong, this article really sparked my interest

to be honest i had no idea what the Bretton Woods system was going in. i ended up googling it and getting a nice little history lesson from wikipedia about how the USD essentially became the worlds reserve currency at the allied bretton woods conference during WWII.

if i understood it all correctly...: during the bretton woods conference, many prominent nations agreed that international currencies would pegged to the USD, and the USD was to be pegged to gold. this meant that the US was backing every single dollar internationally with gold. this move seemed to make sense to other nations because the US had the largest gold reserves by a mile at the time (and nations were scrambling for some economic certainty during the war). fast forward to the 70s, the US has depleted a lot of its gold reserves, and a few countries are jumping ship because of this. shortly after, the US halted the ability for nations to convert their currencies into gold, effectively ending the bretton woods system. this process weakened the dollar a bit, but ultimately the US came out ahead: many countries still peg their currencies to the USD despite its faults, allowing it to remain the worlds reserve currency.

hope u enjoy the fun facts, and please correct me if im wrong 8)



fuznuts: good guesses, they are really the only 2 countries i can think of that have large bond holdings and would be looking to sell.

newb question here, but are there any other nations that mightve infused belgium with the cash for these bonds besides the US? perhaps even a joint effort?

134
good read, any speculation as to who might be dumping all of these bonds?

135
General Discussion / Re: Introduction
« on: May 11, 2014, 02:10:24 am »
lmao, excellent first post. perfect pic for the occasion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12