121
General Discussion / Re: We desperately need better Public Relations: The Call Out
« on: May 24, 2014, 04:45:59 am »
Anyway, here are some guidelines that might help you make better announcements in the future.
1) When you make an important announcement, don't obfuscate it in a random ass thread
2) If you're going to make an announcement, be concise and thorough on your first attempt. This is the post the most people are going to see by a wide margin. make it count
3) Please, please, please make an effort to differentiate when you're posting on behalf of Invictus and when you're posting a personal opinion. Sometimes you qualify your sentences with "We" and "In my opinion" but I hope you can understand how you swapping back and forth between these 'personas' under the same account can make it difficult to distinguish between the two. I suggest a new handle for when you wanna play Invictus
I really hope the best for this project but I think your expectations of the community are a little unreal. I still have faith in y’all but damn, you guys are still awful at managing user expectations and almost equally as bad at communicating the value of your innovations to users/investors. Why is it that nearly every innovation you guys have implemented so far ends up raising the value of PTS/AGS, and yet y’all still have to fight tooth and nail to convince users and investors that you guys aren’t scamming them with each new idea… Seriously, what does it say about the state of Invictus’ PR when loyal users that have already invested tens of thousands of dollars into the ecosystem are shitting bricks because Stan failed to effectively communicate the latest value proposition?
1) When you make an important announcement, don't obfuscate it in a random ass thread
2) If you're going to make an announcement, be concise and thorough on your first attempt. This is the post the most people are going to see by a wide margin. make it count
3) Please, please, please make an effort to differentiate when you're posting on behalf of Invictus and when you're posting a personal opinion. Sometimes you qualify your sentences with "We" and "In my opinion" but I hope you can understand how you swapping back and forth between these 'personas' under the same account can make it difficult to distinguish between the two. I suggest a new handle for when you wanna play Invictus
I really hope the best for this project but I think your expectations of the community are a little unreal. I still have faith in y’all but damn, you guys are still awful at managing user expectations and almost equally as bad at communicating the value of your innovations to users/investors. Why is it that nearly every innovation you guys have implemented so far ends up raising the value of PTS/AGS, and yet y’all still have to fight tooth and nail to convince users and investors that you guys aren’t scamming them with each new idea… Seriously, what does it say about the state of Invictus’ PR when loyal users that have already invested tens of thousands of dollars into the ecosystem are shitting bricks because Stan failed to effectively communicate the latest value proposition?